To S.SHANGARANARAYANAN [Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana]

[Guest guest]

, sangar narayanan

<mackro1932 wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a

lower state. one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of

Tripurasundari, which is the supreme most Goddess. Can you let me

know who gave you this idea and what you propose to do by achieving

the blessings of Dhoomavathi.

>

> Regards,

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

 

Gd Morning S. Shangaranarayanan,

 

Its strange for somebody who claim to be the Upasaka of

Tripurasundari goes around calling other Mahavidyas Upasana as lower

state. You seem to have this elitist mentality. Perhaps you should

really look at yourself instead of trying to advise people of how to

better their sadhana?

[Guest guest]

Especially when all he does is shamefully promote a commercial website.

 

-

NMadasamy

Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:55 PM

To S.SHANGARANARAYANAN [Re: Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana]

 

 

, sangar narayanan

<mackro1932 wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a

lower state. one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of

Tripurasundari, which is the supreme most Goddess. Can you let me

know who gave you this idea and what you propose to do by achieving

the blessings of Dhoomavathi.

>

> Regards,

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

Gd Morning S. Shangaranarayanan,

 

Its strange for somebody who claim to be the Upasaka of

Tripurasundari goes around calling other Mahavidyas Upasana as lower

state. You seem to have this elitist mentality. Perhaps you should

really look at yourself instead of trying to advise people of how to

better their sadhana?

[Guest guest]

I am sorry; but I think we should not go personal. Let us discuss only the issue and not personalities.

 

Mahamuni Das <mahamuni (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote: Especially when all he does is shamefully promote a commercial website.

 

-

NMadasamy

 

Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:55 PM

To S.SHANGARANARAYANAN [Re: Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana]

 

, sangar narayanan

<mackro1932 wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a

lower state. one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of

Tripurasundari, which is the supreme most Goddess. Can you let me

know who gave you this idea and what you propose to do by achieving

the blessings of Dhoomavathi.

>

> Regards,

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

Gd Morning S. Shangaranarayanan,

 

Its strange for somebody who claim to be the Upasaka of

Tripurasundari goes around calling other Mahavidyas Upasana as lower

state. You seem to have this elitist mentality. Perhaps you should

really look at yourself instead of trying to advise people of how to

better their sadhana?

[Guest guest]

That is an issue.

 

-

sankara menon

Tuesday, September 12, 2006 7:09 PM

Re: To S.SHANGARANARAYANAN [Re: Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana]

 

 

I am sorry; but I think we should not go personal. Let us discuss only the issue and not personalities.

 

Mahamuni Das <mahamuni (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote: Especially when all he does is shamefully promote a commercial website.

 

-

NMadasamy

Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:55 PM

To S.SHANGARANARAYANAN [Re: Dhumawati and Bagala Sadhana]

 

, sangar narayanan

<mackro1932 wrote:

>

> Why you are so particular about "Dhoomavathi" sadhana, as it is a

lower state. one should attain the maha nirvana by upasana of

Tripurasundari, which is the supreme most Goddess. Can you let me

know who gave you this idea and what you propose to do by achieving

the blessings of Dhoomavathi.

>

> Regards,

> S.SHANGARANARAYANAN

 

Gd Morning S. Shangaranarayanan,

 

Its strange for somebody who claim to be the Upasaka of

Tripurasundari goes around calling other Mahavidyas Upasana as lower

state. You seem to have this elitist mentality. Perhaps you should

really look at yourself instead of trying to advise people of how to

better their sadhana?

[Guest guest]

Opinions differ according to the guru parampara. Opinions does not mean putting down some one or claiming that others know nothing. if some one is trying to question the very basic principle of exchange of information and not hurting each other, god bless us all.

 

Regards,

S.SHANGARANARAYANAN