Guest guest Posted September 7, 2006 Report Share Posted September 7, 2006 MahddheerGHADhikaraNam-2-2-2 suthra-10-mahaddheerGHavathvA hrasva parimandalAbhyAm-2-2-10 Even so the theory of big and long produced from short and atomic (of the nyaya vaiseshaikas) is untenable. The theory of causation of sankhya has been disproved on the basis of being fallacious and now the causality of atoms are taken up for refutation. The school of Nyayavaiseshaikas claim that the atoms are the cause of the world and the atom is invisible and indivisible and are the ultimate cause which creates the world by combining into dyads and triads. Two atoms combine and become a dyad which is also invisible and denoted by the term hrasva 'short.' three dyads combine to make a thrayaNuka or thrasarENu at which stage it becomes perceivable and acquires magnitude and hence referred to as dheerGHa and mahath, long and big. In this manner gross elements are created and the process goes on till the world of objects is produced. The suthra refutes the theory of atoms itself and hence the view of Nyayavaiseshika that the world has originated from atoms. They say that the atoms have no dimension and no parts in which case they cannot combine and even if they do, since atoms do not have dimension there would not be any question of short,long etc. Ramanuja explains this as follows: The things consisting of parts like threads combine in all their six sides with each other to produce a piece of cloth. So also the atoms must have parts in order to combine to become dyads etc. Otherwise the atoms being without dimension even a thousand atoms combining would not produce any magnitude of long, short etc. If on the other hand it is admitted that they have parts, then those parts must have originated from other parts and thus will result in infinite regress. Vaiseshika may object that since this would mean the atoms having infinite parts there would not be any difference between a mustard seed and a mountain to which Ramanuja replies that the atoms having no dimension the very idea of a mustard seed or a mountain itself is impossible as nothing bigger than a paramanu can be produced. Then the vaiseshika asks 'what is the solution,' to which Ramanuja replies 'vaidhikah pakshah parigrhyathAm !' meaning, they have no alternative than to accept the view of the vedanta that Brahman is the cause of the world. suthra-11- ubhayathAhapi na karmAthah thadhAbhAvah-2-2-11 On both assumptions there can be no motion and hence no creation. The atoms are supposed to be set in motion by adhrshta or unseen principle which must abide either in the atoms or in the individual soul and this suthra says that both assumptions are untenable. Adhrshta, the unseen principle is the effect of karma on the part of the individuals which is causal for the creation and this cannot abide in the atoms. Adhrshta abiding in the individual cannot be responsible for the motion in atoms. If it is due to the contact of the atoms with the individual soul, the adhrshta being beginningless there will be always creation. But the opponent may say that since the fruition of karma differs in respect of time there cannot be creation forever. This presents a difficulty as the pralaya cannot be explained as all the karma of all the souls cannot fructify at the same time for the creatiion to stop. The will of the Lord also cannot be cited as the cause of this because the Isvara of Nyayavaiseshika is inferred, and cannot be proved, as already shown in the suthra 'sAsthraonithvath' (BS.1-1-3) Therefore the causality of atoms is disproved. suthra-12-samavAyAbhyupagamAccha sAmyAdhanavasTHitjhEh-2-2-12 Because of the concept of samavaya there results an infinite regress. SamavAya or inherence is one of the seven catagories,padhArThas of nyayavaiseshikas. Categories are the classification of everything in the world which falls into one of the seven, namely, substance, quality,action,genarality,peculiarity, inherence and non-existence.Out of these, samavaya, inherence, is a concept peculiar to the system of Nyayavaiseshika . It is explained thus. Samavaya, inherence, is the eternal relation between two things inseparable as the substance and quality, motion and moving object, genus, jati and the individual belonging to the jati,etc. The suthra refutes the concept of samavaya on the basis of infinite regress. As samavaya explains the relation between two things inseparable the relation of samavaya to the things that are made inseparable by its presence must be also by samvaya and thus it results in infinite regress, anavasTHA. If it is said that the inseparable connection is the nature of samavaya and hence does not need another connection to explain it, Ramanuja argues that the same naure of connection can be attributed to the two things which are inseparable by nature. suthra-13-nithyamEva cha bhAvAth-2-2-13 Because (the world) would be eternal. According to the nyayavaiseshikas samavaya is eternal and if the connection is eternal the things connected are also eternal and hence the world will be eternal. suthra-14-rupAdhimathvAccha viparyayO dharsanATH-2-2-14 Because the atoms possessing colour etc. will prove the contrary. The atoms of four kinds are said to create the world, namely those of air,fire,water and earth , which possess the peculiar characterstics of the four elements, thaat is, touch,colour, taste and smell. And the atoms are claimed to be eternal and partless. If they possess the characterestics of colour etc they cease to be eternal and partless as all the things that have these qualities are found to be non-eternal and have parts. This is contradictory to the concept of atoms professed by the nyayavaiseshakas. suthra-15-ubhayaHA cha dhOshAth-2-2-15 As there is objection in either case. On the other hand if the atoms do not have colour and other qualities they cannot be the cause of earth and other elements. So either way the theory of atoms being the cause of the world is refuted. suthra-16-aparigrahAthcha athyantham anapEkshA-2-2-2-16 Since it is not accepted it is completely rejected. The thoery of sankhyas advocated by KAPILA, is accepted partly by the followers of the vedas because of its sathkaryavAdha, though it has been proved to be contrary to the vedic concepts. But the theory of atoms, expounded by KaNadha, the founder of vaiseshika, is totally rejected. Thus ends the mahaddheerGhADHikaraNam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.