Fwd: Research paper on 'Astrological Inheritance'

[Guest guest]

Dear Mrutyunjayji,

 

Thanks a lot for your review of my research paper. I will take

you input and will study the things with different perspectives

as you have suggested.

 

I did not understand one point though. What I have tried to

demonstrate that the theory applies to a chart with any lagna. I

am not able to understand why I should seggregate the charts

into 12 groups - one each for a lagna. Can you please elaborate

on this?

 

Again, thanks for sparing your valuable time for going through

the paper written by a novice like me and giving your valuable

suggestions. It will help me to improve my Jyotish skills

further.

 

Thanks,

Krishna

http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com

 

--- jyotish mrutyunjay <astrologer_mrutyunjay > wrote:

 

> Dear friend,

>

> I found your article very intersting.

>

> What interests me is that it is though simple not a

> copy-modify and paste type article/ paper.

>

> (a)some more data and

> (b)use of argala (planet's right to interfere in the

> matters of all the houses) and

> ©the theory of dispositor

> (rasi/stellar/navamsa/sub)(indicators of

> circumstancial and emotional/intellectual limitations

> and capacity)

> and

> (d)application of Astakavarga principle ( overall

> assessment of the inter-planetary cooperations)

>

> can help you to see and analyse the things from 3

> different perspectives

>

> about the cumulative effects of the multiple

> influences

> on the 5th house (children) of the charts.

>

> (e) another method is to segregate charts into 12

> different groups based on the lagna and then make the

> study for each groups separately- this is one of the

> useful methods- since the functional nature of the

> planets remains same for a particular lagna

> ---------------

> TAKING STATISTICAL RANDOM SAMPLES OF CHARTS OF VARIOUS

> LAGNA AND THEN DRAWING THE CONCLUSIONS OUT OF A FEW

> HUNDERED CHARTS- AS DONE BY AVERAGE RESEARCHERS SHOULD

> BE AVOIDED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE- as in such a

> situation we are unable to quantify the natural

> significations vs functional significations and their

> overall impact on the charts

> -------------------

>

> All the above are my personal opinion only.

>

>

> With regards,

>

> Mrutyunjay

>

>

>

>

> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

> around

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

Regards,

Krishna

http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com