why prediction of great astrologer spk rising fails once again?

September 10, 2006

---

hello sir,

u had said in ur post

"I predict that Sri lanka will do well in the tri

series in Sri lanka."

why did u fail? every thing is so general easy for great mind like u

to predict ? when srilanka series itself was cancelled why ur

greatness failed to see it?when u have failed u donot have humility

to say so and instead point fingers at others?can u advance some

great theory and

techiques why u failed we can all learn from this.if u believe

astrology is so general why are writing and reading about it?

according to ur opinion only u can predict no one else when some one

predict every thing is general, it could have been said by any one..

why donot sponsor research of rs one lakh instead of putting down any

one ?

bye

ramalingam.

In , SPK <aquaris_rising wrote:

>

> Which USA open you are talking about ? What sport ?

> Please sepcify.

>

> If you are talking about tennis, look at the seeding

> and you know what the organizers beleive.

>

> 1. Federer

> 2. Nadal

>

> Roddick may sneak into semis.

>

> Did anyone predict Oval test outcome as a forfeiture ?

> This happened for the first time in 129 years of

> Cricket history. If astrology could see these things,

> this was an instance where a completely unusual and

> unexpected happened. Did anyone see it ...NO NO NO.

> Did you predict that the tri sereis will not

> happen..NO.If you are really interested in advancing

> this tool and research try and make some positive

> contributions..not some generalities.Let those who

> actually do the predicting post on the groups. Why are

> you posting on behalf of someone else.

>

> Satish

>

> --- ramalingam2_sekar <ramalingam2_sekar

> wrote:

>

> > hello list members,

> > why donot the people who continously put down other

> > people predict

> > on usa open .some one made mocking comment it is so

> > easy?

> > any one can do it? it is only choice of two? any

> > country war will

> > happen. why are making any predictions? theory of

> > randomness and

> > probabilty can be used.

> > bye

> > ramalingam

> >

> > -- In , SPK

> > <aquaris_rising@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hello Sundeep,

> > >

> > > Excellent post. I have been making similar point

> > for

> > > sometime now. Your post makes an excellent

> > observation

> > > of probability of being randomly correct.

> > >

> > > Its like someone saying that Australia will do

> > well in

> > > next cricket world cup. I mean they have been in

> > > finals in the past 3 world cups, so someone touts

> > that

> > > as a prediction, I feel that does not need any

> > > astrological knowledge what so ever. If one puts

> > > country chart and tithi pravesha and 20 divisional

> > > charts to back their prediction, I would consider

> > it a

> > > waste of time as same can be arrived at with an

> > ounce

> > > of commonsense.

> > >

> > > Anyone who can read and can use a program to cast

> > a

> > > horoscope can tell what lagna is in all the

> > divisions,

> > > what arudha is for a chart, yada yada yada. It is

> > > ameaningless banter. Predict when there are more

> > than

> > > two possibilities ( low probability of an event)

> > and

> > > do it consistently.

> > >

> > > Unfortunately I do not see anyone who can do such

> > a

> > > thing, even the most celebrated ones can not do

> > this.

> > > Thats why astrology is not taken seriously by most

> > > rational people.

> > >

> > > Satish

> > >

> > > --- vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>

> > > wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear Bharatji,

> > > > Not only that, I feel what most people dont

> > > > understand is that in

> > > > order to understand the true value of a

> > prediction,

> > > > you must

> > > > additionally attach to it the probability of

> > > > randomly being correct.

> > > > For example, in two-outcome situations with

> > > > approximately equally

> > > > matched opponents e.g. a match between two teams

> > or

> > > > an election

> > > > between two candidates or a bill being

> > > > passed/rejected by lawmakers,

> > > > the probability of randomly being correct in a

> > > > prediction, without

> > > > using any principles whatsoever, is 0.5.

> > > > Consequently, any prediction

> > > > of such situations does not carry much weight to

> > > > begin with. In order

> > > > for a prediction to carry a lot of weight, the

> > > > probability of

> > > > randomly being correct should be very low.

> > > >

> > > > For example, if an astrologer were to correctly

> > > > predict the month and

> > > > year of birth of the first child of a person

> > when

> > > > the person was not

> > > > even thinking of being married, it would be an

> > > > extremely impressive

> > > > prediction, because the probability of randomly

> > > > being correct would

> > > > be very low. A random prediction would have to

> > > > select from at least

> > > > 10 childbearing years in each of which there

> > would

> > > > be 12

> > > > possibilities. So there would be at least a 100

> > > > possibilities making

> > > > the probability of a random hit being 0.01.

> > > >

> > > > Such predictions have to be highlighted (I mean

> > > > those in which random

> > > > chance of correctness is very low). Otherwise,

> > if

> > > > two-outcome

> > > > situations are what are to be focussed on, then

> > a

> > > > string of two

> > > > outcome situations must be shown e.g. a list of

> > > > twenty matches, in

> > > > each of which the prediction came true. The

> > > > probability of RANDOMLY

> > > > being correct in ALL 20, would be 0.5*0.5*0.5..

> > > > twenty times, which

> > > > is very low.

> > > >

> > > > It is also not ok to post simply the matches in

> > > > which a prediction

> > > > was correct. All matches for which predictions

> > were

> > > > made must be

> > > > posted, even those that were wrong, so that an

> > > > observant reader can

> > > > contrast the random chance of success with the

> > > > astrologer's

> > > > prediction quality.

> > > >

> > > > I say all this not to put down astrologers, only

> > to

> > > > awaken them to

> > > > mathematical realities. If they respected

> > certain

> > > > mathematical

> > > > realities, and presented their predictions

> > within

> > > > the context of

> > > > these realities, the average person would

> > quickly

> > > > accept their

> > > > results. Moreover, it would serve as a litmus

> > test

> > > > for good

> > > > astrologers.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > , "Bharat

> > Hindu

> > > > Astrology"

> > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Namaskaar Sri Ramalingam

> > > > >

> > > > > Wouldn't it be better if you inform of such

> > posts,

> > > > when they are

> > > > written and

> > > > > not when they come true?

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > Bharat

> > > >

> > >

> > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> > protection around

> > >

> >

>

September 10, 2006

Dear Mr, Ramalingam,

You seems to be a great student of a great astrologer of this century.

Did your Guru predicted for the cancelation of the series?

With best wishes,