GOD MEN OR MONEY SPINNERS ? 2

[Guest guest]

Bhaskar

It was to highlight the good side of him i posted, good u see it differently

I have also strongly commented on arjuns twice on the near anti hindu sentiments than on others not coverd one bit.

I have also added Satya sai Baba's case he has also said from hear say. sure he will get the right info in time. till then this will go n we need to project good men among hindus well and BAD ones bad I have named them also. so no bias on any1 good.

 

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Shri Prashant sahab,

Namaste,

I do not know about this side of Him. normally we comment on people

only on the side we know of. These comments also change, they are

never permanent, they change when we see the better side of ones

persona, then though the negatives may still remain, yet we learn to

ignore the darker ones and concentrate on the good ones, and at that

times,the good comments come forth. Now you have given a new

perspective to this gentleman a side which at least i knew not,

anyway persons like me are commoners whose views as I said change as

per new revelations received, and better understanding, therefore

please treat my comments on such matters as relative and subject to

change.

Anyway it was not personal and not intended to malign anyone,

neither a God man nor supporter, just what was apparently noticed by

the viewer in this case, also acknowledging the good name

of God being spread by these men whatever may be the motives, is not

for us to look into. Thanking you for taking pains to show the bright

side. I was inside not feeling very happy to write what I wrote in

my previous post frankly speaking and being honest with You.

regards,

Bhaskar.

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> Bhaskar

>

> I have been to a few of this holy men INCLUDING THIS SRI SRI

RAVISHANKAR ji, he has done comendable work for pro Hindu work

unless u see him and his speeches u may never get to know him on TV

he is no good but I have heard his lecture cassettes, CDs good

material

>

> HE IS THE ONLY HINDU who has protested and not got labeled as

communal for asking Govt of India in subsidising Huj pilgrimage and

not Nanakshaib or Manasgangotri trips for siekhs, and Hindus .

> he also has openly critised the double standards they show to

Hindu charities where the govt has a endowment ministry and swallows

its money no real temple protection, funding is done.

> where as Wakf board and church are free to amass wealth assets,

buy sell, no questions asked. and NO MINISTRY tons of money come

from gulf for wakf and from West for church to convert Hindus to

christanity at approx 30k per head, he has protested

> but pravin togadia and others make it so badly we feel that other

devils r better the church or wakf activities.

>

> RAVI SHANKAR NEVER CALLED himself god as I know he said he isa

sadhu a sadhu can have a family life too, not a sanyasi.

> he has the world around him no other Hindu figure gets such a

following he pays all his voulenteers monthly exp at actuals. for

any activity all musicians, vedic pandits are paid well and their

services used from time to time. has no known scandel on him yet but

the missionaries willtarget him someway soon.

>

> all pouplar Hindu figures, spots inthe last 3 yrs have been

discredited debunked even sabrimala temple is the latest.

>

> the Lucknow school incident is a sad one where if at all Hindus

react it is so poorly why not protest for days and make a point,

why vandelsie the area and get a bad name...!

>

> I will ask the principal to urgently see Bush Jr and also go to

Iraq and save millions of life if he really so real, just make

belive hysteronics.if Hindus did it will be called obscurunist,

communal, the left, secular parties r silent till date.

>

>

>

> Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote: Certainly one

among us in India who calls himself Bhagwan , and has a

> great fan following , may have done some Bhajans and histrionics

too

> on stage by trying to mimic Lord Shankar Bhagvan, but

> ultimately he is a money spinner. Any of his courses you go ,

> not less than Rs.2000- That means in other words only the rich

can come

> in his fold or become devotees of God ?

> What he speaks you cant understand half of the time, and many

> times better replies can be given by a small child too.

> just by having hair on body one does not become man, your face

should

> depict the seriousness needed in spiritual undertakings.

> Once in a while humor is good, but not all times giggling like

> a girl.A proper public image has to be mantained.

> anyway Not here to degress anyone. But all are not real men

> of God. these just use religion as a tool for earning money and

filling

> their own coffers. Some good is created in the process by these

men is

> a seperate matter. Anyday I would prefer a unsung pandit giving

> lectrures who is a real spiritual person by way of living and

behaviour.

>

> Just like I would prefer books of Gita press any day to

Taraporewala

> Sons and Co., who have got the best spiritual books, but at what

a

> price? they dont even mention the price printed on the books,

they have

> a seperate list which keeps on changing as per demand from

foreign

> buyers. Whereas Gita Press is having too the finest books in the

world

> but at the cheapest prices for even a poor man/labourer earning

> Rs.20 a day. These are real men of God (Working in Gita Press),

> spreading the name of God through cheap priced literatures,

books,

> mgazines etc. with no stage shows, no media publicity, no personal

> charishmatic behaviours . I bow to these and men like Swami

Sivananda of

> haridwar.

>

> regards,

> bhaskar.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

call rates.

>

>