Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> You remained silent over my responses so you accept them:

 

I many times wrote that we can discuss these things after we have finished

your point b). Please try to focus on your point b). Please read my previous

text, and answer my questions.

 

 

> Logically we do not have to prove the status quo continues since within

> the world of logical argument that is axiomatic.

 

This is your point c). We can discuss it after we have finished your point

b).

 

 

> Clearly we don’t have to prove anything other than the historically

> verifiable fact that he left the status quo you agree he established in

> 1966, intact (see NCIP, TFO etc).

 

This fact is not historically verifiable by a person who does not know how a

devotee is authorized to be a diksa guru.

 

I am not asking you to prove your point b). I am asking you to admit that it

is unproven.

 

 

> The fact that you are now asking me, your opponent, what sort of evidence

> would stop the status quo proves how lost you are.

 

Since you don't know what sort of evidence would stop the status quo, you

cannot know whether the status quo stopped or not. But still you claim that

it did not stop. This is rascaldom.

 

 

Summary:

 

Your point b) is unproven. And since your whole theory is based on that

unproven assumption, your whole theory is unproven.

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa