Speak up now, silent majority -- PLEASE?

[Guest guest]

Over the last some years that I have been associated with this forum

in particular and many others over more than a decade, one thing is

not clear to me:

 

WHAT DOES THE SILENT MAJORITY WANT and see as the product in THEIR

jyotish forum?

 

If you want readings without the explanations for you do not know

what those mean and don't care, SAY SO ALOUD!

 

If you want beginner stuff, sorry but you are never going to learn

jyotish by email! Lots of books and articles and web-material exists

already! STUDY that please!

 

If you are just confused after what you have read and studied, then

you are at the right place! Please take the time to compose your

questions succinctly and give data about the examples that confuse

and perplex you! PLEASE do not try to TEST others! You are not ready

for that role if you need to ask questions and do not have

astrological answers already!! Be sincere please!

 

The reason we see so many skirmishes and ego-fights and so quickly

shift our agendas into areas that really have nothing to do with

astrology is because posters are not sincere about their agendas!

 

Why do I say that?

 

Can anyone really definitively identify from a blind birthdata if the

chart belongs to a male or female, or identify the religion of the

nativity or even the race or the person (without peeking into the

atlas and figuring out that the birth happened in Luxembourg!).

 

If these cannot be definitively figured out by looking at a

horoscope, and please demonstrate me to be wrong -- WHY ARE WE EVEN

WASTING ASTROLOGICAL TIME DISCUSSING ABOUT THESE NON-ISSUES AS THEY

PERTAIN TO A-S-T-R-O-L-O-G-Y?

[Guest guest]

-

Dear mr rohini ranjan

who gets to decide that whoose queston will be considered and replied

by the group? should there be any discrimination or all questions

should be taken up?

the silent majority is not opening up. is it not one indicaton that

the trust may not exist? the unlikeable scenario of other taking

decision of your concern?

one should probe deeper to understand the utility of such a group.

pl reply if one wants to on my personal e mail as now i seldom visit

the group site

Regard to all group members

axe

 

-- In , "crystal pages"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> Over the last some years that I have been associated with this

forum

> in particular and many others over more than a decade, one thing is

> not clear to me:

>

> WHAT DOES THE SILENT MAJORITY WANT and see as the product in THEIR

> jyotish forum?

>

> If you want readings without the explanations for you do not know

> what those mean and don't care, SAY SO ALOUD!

>

> If you want beginner stuff, sorry but you are never going to learn

> jyotish by email! Lots of books and articles and web-material

exists

> already! STUDY that please!

>

> If you are just confused after what you have read and studied, then

> you are at the right place! Please take the time to compose your

> questions succinctly and give data about the examples that confuse

> and perplex you! PLEASE do not try to TEST others! You are not

ready

> for that role if you need to ask questions and do not have

> astrological answers already!! Be sincere please!

>

> The reason we see so many skirmishes and ego-fights and so quickly

> shift our agendas into areas that really have nothing to do with

> astrology is because posters are not sincere about their agendas!

>

> Why do I say that?

>

> Can anyone really definitively identify from a blind birthdata if

the

> chart belongs to a male or female, or identify the religion of the

> nativity or even the race or the person (without peeking into the

> atlas and figuring out that the birth happened in Luxembourg!).

>

> If these cannot be definitively figured out by looking at a

> horoscope, and please demonstrate me to be wrong -- WHY ARE WE EVEN

> WASTING ASTROLOGICAL TIME DISCUSSING ABOUT THESE NON-ISSUES AS THEY

> PERTAIN TO A-S-T-R-O-L-O-G-Y?

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Rohini ji ,

Namaskar,

I am posting a message after a very long time.

 

I am now a silent member of the forum, and occasionally visit, say

once in 10 days, these forum, just to refresh myself, or sheer

enjoyment of readings of astrological chit chat or some serious

discussions or some knowledge gains from some message or pursue some

interesting case.

 

I read your messages to enjoy the poetry or prose and some astro-

insights.

 

In my opinion many become members for short durations but do not

continue and remain part of the list.

 

Anyway, for me it is real enjoyment visiting the group once a while

to know what is happening.

 

With many good wishes to you and all.

 

Inder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, "axeaxa" <axeaxa wrote:

>

> -

> Dear mr rohini ranjan

> who gets to decide that whoose queston will be considered and

replied

> by the group? should there be any discrimination or all questions

> should be taken up?

> the silent majority is not opening up. is it not one indicaton that

> the trust may not exist? the unlikeable scenario of other taking

> decision of your concern?

> one should probe deeper to understand the utility of such a group.

> pl reply if one wants to on my personal e mail as now i seldom

visit

> the group site

> Regard to all group members

> axe

>

> -- In , "crystal pages"

> <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> >

> > Over the last some years that I have been associated with this

> forum

> > in particular and many others over more than a decade, one thing

is

> > not clear to me:

> >

> > WHAT DOES THE SILENT MAJORITY WANT and see as the product in

THEIR

> > jyotish forum?

> >

> > If you want readings without the explanations for you do not know

> > what those mean and don't care, SAY SO ALOUD!

> >

> > If you want beginner stuff, sorry but you are never going to

learn

> > jyotish by email! Lots of books and articles and web-material

> exists

> > already! STUDY that please!

> >

> > If you are just confused after what you have read and studied,

then

> > you are at the right place! Please take the time to compose your

> > questions succinctly and give data about the examples that

confuse

> > and perplex you! PLEASE do not try to TEST others! You are not

> ready

> > for that role if you need to ask questions and do not have

> > astrological answers already!! Be sincere please!

> >

> > The reason we see so many skirmishes and ego-fights and so

quickly

> > shift our agendas into areas that really have nothing to do with

> > astrology is because posters are not sincere about their agendas!

> >

> > Why do I say that?

> >

> > Can anyone really definitively identify from a blind birthdata if

> the

> > chart belongs to a male or female, or identify the religion of

the

> > nativity or even the race or the person (without peeking into the

> > atlas and figuring out that the birth happened in Luxembourg!).

> >

> > If these cannot be definitively figured out by looking at a

> > horoscope, and please demonstrate me to be wrong -- WHY ARE WE

EVEN

> > WASTING ASTROLOGICAL TIME DISCUSSING ABOUT THESE NON-ISSUES AS

THEY

> > PERTAIN TO A-S-T-R-O-L-O-G-Y?

> >

>

[Guest guest]

-

Dear mr axeaxa,

 

I think I would go with the other explanation given recently for

the 'silence' of majority! That being: individuals join forums and

then decide it is not their cup of tea and fail to . Many

try to by leaving messages on the message board! They are

obviously new to internet. There could be other reasons too,

reflecting the diversity that gets attracted to jyotish, astrology,

divination, remedies!

 

In my personal view, all questions politely stated must be welcome

and generally are! Sometimes very difficult and potentially volatile

issues are raised and discussed in a rational manner. At other times,

that may not be the case. The joy of diversity!

 

So, if you were reading in my posting an attempt to express a desire

that there should be "controlled" content, that was definitely not my

intention or desire.

 

Voting is a fundamental right in a democracy. In most democratic

nations, voter turn-out tends to be rather poor, generally less than

50% for one reason or another!

 

The silent majority, regardless of their numbers, are simply negating

their importance and even existence when they are choosing to remain

silent and not participating in normal activities in the forum. That

is how we build trust and give ourselves validity as forum members.

 

I was trying to remind the busy, apathetic, nonexistent -- thus

silent majority that if they do not show up at the forum, they risk

being forgotten, if not eliminated -- just by non-participation!

 

RR

 

 

 

 

, "axeaxa" <axeaxa wrote:

>

> -

> Dear mr rohini ranjan

> who gets to decide that whoose queston will be considered and

replied

> by the group? should there be any discrimination or all questions

> should be taken up?

> the silent majority is not opening up. is it not one indicaton that

> the trust may not exist? the unlikeable scenario of other taking

> decision of your concern?

> one should probe deeper to understand the utility of such a group.

> pl reply if one wants to on my personal e mail as now i seldom

visit

> the group site

> Regard to all group members

> axe

>

> -- In , "crystal pages"

> <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> >

> > Over the last some years that I have been associated with this

> forum

> > in particular and many others over more than a decade, one thing

is

> > not clear to me:

> >

> > WHAT DOES THE SILENT MAJORITY WANT and see as the product in

THEIR

> > jyotish forum?

> >

> > If you want readings without the explanations for you do not know

> > what those mean and don't care, SAY SO ALOUD!

> >

> > If you want beginner stuff, sorry but you are never going to

learn

> > jyotish by email! Lots of books and articles and web-material

> exists

> > already! STUDY that please!

> >

> > If you are just confused after what you have read and studied,

then

> > you are at the right place! Please take the time to compose your

> > questions succinctly and give data about the examples that

confuse

> > and perplex you! PLEASE do not try to TEST others! You are not

> ready

> > for that role if you need to ask questions and do not have

> > astrological answers already!! Be sincere please!

> >

> > The reason we see so many skirmishes and ego-fights and so

quickly

> > shift our agendas into areas that really have nothing to do with

> > astrology is because posters are not sincere about their agendas!

> >

> > Why do I say that?

> >

> > Can anyone really definitively identify from a blind birthdata if

> the

> > chart belongs to a male or female, or identify the religion of

the

> > nativity or even the race or the person (without peeking into the

> > atlas and figuring out that the birth happened in Luxembourg!).

> >

> > If these cannot be definitively figured out by looking at a

> > horoscope, and please demonstrate me to be wrong -- WHY ARE WE

EVEN

> > WASTING ASTROLOGICAL TIME DISCUSSING ABOUT THESE NON-ISSUES AS

THEY

> > PERTAIN TO A-S-T-R-O-L-O-G-Y?

> >

>