Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 My dear Ajamila Prabhuji, Please accept my humble obeisances _/\ò_. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! > For those who argue that Srila Prabhupada allowed contaminated white sugar > circumstantially and 30 years later use that as an excuse to offer it to the > Deities when there are plenty of uncontaminated choices available have > seriously missed the point and can only be guilty of being lazy to make the > effort to keep pure. Thank you. At least someone understood my point. In service of Srimati Vrinda Devi, Deena Bandhu dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 > > On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Rasananda ACBSP wrote: > > > The entire argument about 'contaminated sugar' as presented by you is > > specious. > > I'd just like to point out that in India contamination doesn't only > come about by direct contact with something or by non-veg material > being incorporated into it. Food (bhoga) can be contaminated by being > looked at by animals like dogs, or people who lust over it before it > is offered. So to say that something is not contaminated even though > it comes into direct contact with something contaminated just doesn't > fly. A pot which previously contained alcohol is considered unusable, > even though by material standards it may be cleaned. So there is a > difference between something being materially contaminated with > something else and being ritually contaminated. > > We are concerned with the ritual contamination. > > ys > > GKD And the ritual contamination being the entry level standard. ys ad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.