Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 Although all 3 brothers were asuras why was Vibishana different from his brothers and was a vishnu bhaktha? I had posed this doubt to several upanyaskas and got a convincing answer from sri.chakravarthy iyengar. Since sanathkumara cursed the dwarabalakas to be born on earth for no crime commited and only following their duties Lord Naryana punished the munikumara to suffer a similar fate ,to be born with the dwarabalakas. The difference was that the two as per their erquest were sworn enemies of the Lord while the munikumara remained a Baktha. THis was vibishana and he was prahalada in the previous birth and akroora in the next birth. I undrstand the basis for this is found in Vishnudarma. This led to another doubt-Both vibishana and prahalada are chiranjeevis. How can the same jeevathma simultaneously exist in the form of two chiranjeevis.? Secondly since the dwarabalakas returned to vaikuntam after the third birth the muni kumara could not attain moksha? Thirdly why did the dwarabalakas take up the form of kshatria mortals instead of asuras in the third birth?Adiyens ignorance be kindly pardoned by the members of the forum. dasan-narayanan Sri Narayandesikaya Namah Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.