'Aryan invasion theory is British-created falsehood’ -- By Rashme Sehgal

[Guest guest]

hinducivilization, EagleSM23 <eaglesm23

wrote:

 

 

http://headlines.sify.com/news/fullstory.php?

id=14304861&headline=Aryan~invasion~theory~is~false:~Swamy

'Aryan invasion theory is British-created falsehood'

By Rashme Sehgal

 

Subramanian Swamy continues to play the role of

crusader. This time he is conducting a crusade in

favour of Hindus and Hinduism. His latest book titled

'Hindus Under Seige' argues that Hindus need to

acquire a new mindset to meet the challenges facing

them from several quarters.

While not everyone will agree with this thesis, there

is no doubt that India 's perennial political gadfly

is working hard to re-enter the political mainstream

by aligning himself with a mainstream party.

Excerpts from the interview with Swamy:

Your book warns that unless Hindus do not come

together psychologically and culturally; they will be

destroyed as were the ancient Greeks and Egyptians.

Isn 't that theory a little far-fetched?

Indians are facing a major identity crisis. We need to

ask ourselves who we are? What is our core ethos? As a

nation, we have been fed so many falsehoods.

The whole theory about the Aryan invasion and their

creation of Sanskrit and the Vedas, is nothing but

British-created falsehood. These historians also

claimed that the Saraswati river was a myth until the

American satellite Landstat photographed the map and

bed of this river.

The Harappan civilisation is nothing but a

continuation of the Vedic epoch. This north-south

Aryan-Dravidian divide has been proved wrong by

American scholars having taken the DNA of Indians and

Europeans and founded that there is not difference

between the so-called Aryans and the Dravidians. Ours

has been a continuous civilization for the last 10,000

years.

Most Indians would be quite happy to accept this?

Yes but quite the contrary is happening. Hindus are

being systematically prepared for psychological

enslavement and not the other way around. Take the way

a false murder case was foisted on the Kanchi

Shankaracharya. The case was bogus and was thrown out

by the Supreme Court as having `no worthwhile prima

facie evidence '.

The Shankaracharya was arrested in a Congress-ruled

state on Diwali day. The Finance Ministry froze 142

bank accounts of the Mutt and not a single Congress

leader from Sonia Gandhi down to their district level

president uttered a word against the arrest. He was

put in a jail with other criminals. It was pointed out

to the government that when political leaders like

Sheikh Abdullah, Jaiprakash Narayan and Morarjee Desai

were arrested, they were not lodged in jail.

The circumstantial evidence pointed quite clearly

towards the Christian lobby that was working against

him. The Shankaracharya had been going to Dalit

enclaves and consecrating their temples and thereby

restricting the influence of the Christians who had

looked upon the Dalits as being a fertile ground for

conversion. Obviously, all this had the blessings of

Sonia Gandhi who is a nominee for the Christian lobby.

 

But you go on to debunk our founding fathers adopting

`secularism ', without debating or defining what this

meant?

When Martin Luther had used the word secularism, he

had meant the power of the state could be used without

the directions of the church. In India, Nehru accepted

the Marxian definition as being something eschewing

religion. This did not work as this has been rejected

by the public at large.

You use the word Chakravartin.

The Chakravartin would be the apex authority. While

society would work in a decentralised manner but when

there was a threat, the people would come together and

that is how we should work towards the future.

You are so anti-Sonia Gandhi and yet you were a close

friend of her husband, the late Rajiv Gandhi?

We need a permanent holiday from the Nehru family. It

seems strange that the widow of the late Rajiv Gandhi

had no compunction in writing to the Supreme Court

asking for a pardon of the four people who had killed

him. No such letters were written for Satwant Singh

and many others. Nor does she have any compunction in

working with parties who have worked closely with the

LTTE? I am still fighting for revenge against those

who killed Rajiv Gandhi.

But at one point of time you were closely associated

with both Jayalalitha and Sonia Gandhi. In fact, you

helped bring down an earlier government at the centre.

Why did your relations with Sonia Gandhi sour?

I had a working relationship with her (Sonia). But she

betrayed me. Before the Vajpayee government was

brought down, I had asked her quite specifically if

she was a candidate for the prime minister. She said

she would discuss this after the fall of the

government. When it had fallen, she was the first to

declare that she had the support of 270 MPs.

You also blocked her plans to become prime minister?

I was called to meet the President at Rashtrapati at

12.45 p.m. The Congress was at that point claiming

Sonia had 340 letters of support and would be asked to

become prime minister at 5 p.m. of the same day. She

however got a letter from the President telling her

not to come as he would have to seek the opinion of

the Supreme Court before he could swear her in. I have

been demanding that the Congress make that letter

public but so far that has not been done

But at one point you were also close to Jayalalithaa?

At one time we were good friends but I had told her

from the start that I would not withdraw the cases I

had filed against her. At one point, she was fined Rs

28 crore by the Madras High Court but she has gone

into appeal against that judgement.

Are you planning to join another political party?

I came to politics via the Jan Sangh. My problem with

them arose because of dilution of their policies. But

I have never left the Janata party. In fact, I am one

of the few leaders who has never changed a party.

What do you think about the performance of the present

government?

The government has no policy whatsoever. It maybe led

by an economist but even its economic policy is

totally ad hoc and directionless. The economy is doing

well only because of the performance of private

manufacturing, the service and the IT industry, all of

which lie outside the domain of the government sector.

 

This government has no counter terrorist policy.

Terrorist attacks after stepped up after 2004. The

prime minister cannot stand up to Pakistan. What does

he mean by saying Pakistan is equally affected by

terrorism. Has any attempt been made to blow up their

Parliament? Have they faced frequent bomb attacks?

Our foreign policy has become a stooge of America. I

'm not saying we should support Iran, nuclear deal but

we must stand up to them when it is a question of our

own national interest. I would say this is the most

incompetent government since the time of Shah Alam. In

the coming UP elections, the Janata Party will be

entering into an alliance with the BJP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

--- End forwarded message ---