Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 Respected all, Is it possible to know the answer to any one question thru any Sadhana or mantra? Or is there anyone who has sidhi to do this? I have come across many people who claim to see the future by looking at the face. Please advice. Regards, Puneet --- <mathhelp_04 > wrote: > > It looks from your email that , you are looking for the names of 52 > Bhairav in reference to the 52 Shakti peeth , i.e pairings of Devi and > Bhairav . I have their names and pairings . There are many more > Bhairav , like the pairings of 52 Devi to 52 Bhairav is not the same > as the pairing of 64 yogini to 64 Bhairav and 10 Mahavidya and 10 > Bhairav and Asta Shakti and Asta Bhairav. > Actually 51 pairings are known but Tara peeth at Rampurhat Bengal is > excluded from the list of 51 shrines for special importance . It is > the place where the eye ball of sati fell , and Bhairav there is > Akshobhya and devi as Tara . That 1 + 51 makes it 52 .. > Its special because most celebrated Tantrik's including sage Vashista > has got siddhi in Pisach-marg . > > > > > > > > , "sam_kali81" <sam_kali81 wrote: > > > > jai gurudev, > > thats what gurubhai told me and asked for what purpose i > > need it butmy bad luck nor has he forwarded the literature to me and > > deleted the mail by mistake. i remember his name was rohitji > > something but the last messagre by someonewith the similiar name was > > qiute long time back.other member as satendra gupta and bhariav bhai > > would have helped but they have not visited this site for quite long > > time > > guruji wishing probably i would get it someday some how .rohitji > > or if any gurubhai is listening and has this information please > > forward it if possible as a pdf format to samkali2006 > > > > jai gurudev > > > > > > > > > > , "mathhelp_04" <mathhelp_04@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean you saw the dhyan of all the 52 bhairav and their > > > mantras ? i thought that the details are available for 8 but not > > all 52 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "sam_kali81" <sam_kali81@> wrote: > > > > > > > > jai gurudev , > > > > does anyone have names of 64 kritya and 52 bhariav . > > if > > > > possible could they be passed with mantra & dhayan. it would be > > great. > > > > needed for personal record.I received a mail from gurubhai > > regarding > > > > use of this information but really soory mail got deleated with > > spam. > > > > it would be great if ROHITJI you could send me the literature. > > > > > > > > JAI GURUDEV > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === Message Truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 Jai Gurudev, There is a mantra in 'Mantra Vigan' book authored by gurdev. You can know the answer of your question through siddhi of this mantra. Though i never tired it, but i will post it on this gorup tomorrow. --Akshay Puneet Gulati <puneetgulati05 > wrote: Respected all, Is it possible to know the answer to any one question thru any Sadhana or mantra? Or is there anyone who has sidhi to do this? I have come across many people who claim to see the future by looking at the face. Please advice. Regards, Puneet --- <mathhelp_04 > wrote: > > It looks from your email that , you are looking for the names of 52 > Bhairav in reference to the 52 Shakti peeth , i.e pairings of Devi and > Bhairav . I have their names and pairings . There are many more > Bhairav , like the pairings of 52 Devi to 52 Bhairav is not the same > as the pairing of 64 yogini to 64 Bhairav and 10 Mahavidya and 10 > Bhairav and Asta Shakti and Asta Bhairav. > Actually 51 pairings are known but Tara peeth at Rampurhat Bengal is > excluded from the list of 51 shrines for special importance . It is > the place where the eye ball of sati fell , and Bhairav there is > Akshobhya and devi as Tara . That 1 + 51 makes it 52 .. > Its special because most celebrated Tantrik's including sage Vashista > has got siddhi in Pisach-marg . > > > > > > > > , "sam_kali81" <sam_kali81 wrote: > > > > jai gurudev, > > thats what gurubhai told me and asked for what purpose i > > need it butmy bad luck nor has he forwarded the literature to me and > > deleted the mail by mistake. i remember his name was rohitji > > something but the last messagre by someonewith the similiar name was > > qiute long time back.other member as satendra gupta and bhariav bhai > > would have helped but they have not visited this site for quite long > > time > > guruji wishing probably i would get it someday some how .rohitji > > or if any gurubhai is listening and has this information please > > forward it if possible as a pdf format to samkali2006 > > > > jai gurudev > > > > > > > > > > , "mathhelp_04" <mathhelp_04@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean you saw the dhyan of all the 52 bhairav and their > > > mantras ? i thought that the details are available for 8 but not > > all 52 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "sam_kali81" <sam_kali81@> wrote: > > > > > > > > jai gurudev , > > > > does anyone have names of 64 kritya and 52 bhariav . > > if > > > > possible could they be passed with mantra & dhayan. it would be > > great. > > > > needed for personal record.I received a mail from gurubhai > > regarding > > > > use of this information but really soory mail got deleated with > > spam. > > > > it would be great if ROHITJI you could send me the literature. > > > > > > > > JAI GURUDEV > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === Message Truncated === Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2006 Report Share Posted October 28, 2006 please tell the name of 52 shaktipeeth and its address Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.