Guest guest Posted October 12, 2006 Report Share Posted October 12, 2006 Ananda wrote: Namaste Michael, In message #33716 of 10th Oct, you wrote: "In the sort of philosophical cooking that I do the 'vegetables' can be diced ever so finely but not much more is added to their nutritional value. One may go so far as to puree them and stuff hollowed out marrows and egg-plants. As the woman said once 'life is too short for stuffing mushrooms'" Yes Michael, it seems that we share a skeptical suspicion of what's 'cooked up' by overly elaborate analysis. But I'd extend that suspicion to 'feeding up' as well. I'd even say that genuine enquiry may well result from getting fed up with our habitual cooking up and feeding up of bloated ignorance. And you are right to take me to task for my persisting habits of feeding on this cooked-up bloat. But what could be the way out of this persistent problem? One way perhaps is to become so fed up that one turns more honestly to chewing and digesting. I'd say perhaps that life is not too short for that. Then, instead of stuffing food, there may result a more effective elimination of undigested waste, so as to attain the essential value of nutrition. But, dear oh dear, as I say this, I must confess that you could well be right to accuse me of too much cooking up again. Ananda ||||||||||||||||||| Namaste Ananadaji, You've taken me up wrong if you think that there was any reference to you in that 'souffle'. It was a mere 'vol au vent' that was for my own consumption. I wouldn't say that you were overly nice (in Jane Austen's sense) but that you have a due care for clarity. Every cook has their own 'rasa'. Bon Appetit, Michel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.