Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

You presented arguments that the GBC was not authorized to change the

initiation system in ISKCON on their own initiative. We can discuss this

after we finished your point c) ("Srila Prabhupada remains the [sole] diksa

guru for ISKCON").

 

 

> Therefore the burden of proof falls on you to show where, when and how the

> GBC were suddenly authorised to change the system of initiation.

 

As I already wrote several times, when you ask me to prove something, then

please quote my statement that you want me to prove.

 

 

> Please re-read what I actually claimed about the quotes where Srila

> Prabhupada was asked who would succeed him. When you have re-read my

> actual claim you will find these quotes in TFO, just look for the word

> ‘succeed’.

 

I found only two statements. Srila Prabhupada said them to guests in

conversations. But you consider conversations with guests irrelevant

regarding initiations in ISKCON. Or do you consider conversations with

guests relevant if they fit in your theory, and irrelevant if they don't fit

in your theory?

 

 

I am waiting for the quotes that confirm your point c), quotes from Srila

Prabhupada saying that his disciples are not authorized to be diksa gurus in

ISKCON, that they cannot make their own disciples.

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa