Gurukula abuse-it is al coming out

[Guest guest]

Why are we Ganging Up on Dhanurdhara Swami?

BY: GURUKULI DASA

Oct 15, USA (SUN) — I am a former Vrindavana Gurukula student. I am very much

aware of the abuse and violence that many innocent children suffered at the

hands of Dhanurdhara Swami; children that were entrusted to him by Srila

Prabhupada and Krsna for protection and guidance.

Why is it that Dhanurdhara was allowed to remain in a position where he was

able to abuse, beat and exploit Srila Prabhupada’s children for over 20 years?

In my eyes Dhanurdhara Maharaj is simply a small part of a big machine that

has been and continues to abuse and exploit on many levels the sincere souls

that come to take shelter of Srila Prabhupada’s movement. There is something

fundamentally wrong at the very root of the values and morals of our society.

My intention in writing this paper is to raise the awareness of our society

regarding the magnitude of the problem we have at hand. Although our leaders

have made many mistakes, we cannot simply blame them; for we are also

implicated, because we allowed them to make these very mistakes. If we are

dissatisfied

with what we have today we must endeavor to create what we want for the

future. We must work to uplift the collective consciousness of our society. To

ensure that in the future the same mistakes will not be repeated. I believe the

 

first step is to define the problem. Once knowledge is made available, we can

begin to take responsibility.

It is not the scope of this letter to assassinate the character of all the

devotees mentioned here, I respect the dedication and service of some of the

devotees I will be mentioning. My intent is to isolate and expose behaviors and

 

incidents that I deem as unacceptable. I hope that the Vaisnava community has

the wisdom, the maturity and the goodwill to use this information in

constructive ways. I also hope that the benefits of posting this paper will

outweigh the

negative aspects. These devotees who in my eyes have committed mistakes must

be made accountable.

Despite the overwhelming evidence against Dhanurdhara Swami very little has

ever been done. Even after the recent uproar that Ananda’s death has created;

Romapada Swami at the New Vrindavana Kuli Mela gathering had the audacity to

propose two possible punishments suggested by the GBC; N.1, that Dhanurdharas’

ability to give classes be cut by 50%; or N.2 that he spend 50% of his time

helping former Gurukula students. Where is the justice? Here is a man who is

guilty beyond any possible doubt, yet the GBC is reluctant to punish him in a

way

that is fit, to the detriment of the credibility and respectability of the GBC

body as a whole.

Lord Ramacandra made the inconceivable sacrifice of exiling His beloved wife

Sita Devi, not because She was guilty, but because as a leader it was His duty

to set the example for humanity, regardless of his personal interest. Some

will argue that this is an unrealistic level of integrity to expect of humans;

I

feel that if our gurus are willing to accept a standard of worship worthy of

the Supreme Lord they must also be able to exercise a similar level of

integrity.

This reinforces in me what is already self evident: The welfare of the

society at large is not sufficiently prioritized. The GBC has not taken a

serious

stance to punish Dhanurdhara Swami for his crimes. We have had to wait for the

community of Vaisnavas to be outraged before anything was done. And even then

the proposed punishments are insulting and demeaning to those who suffered at

his hands. Until the Gurukuli law suit was filed, ISKCON did not accept

responsibility nor offer help to its victims.

I believe that Dhanurdhara stayed because most of the people involved the in

management of the Vridavana Gurukula, to some extent, share the blame, for

which they have to this day failed to take responsibility. Below is a brief

list

of some of the people that have been involved.

List of some of the teachers who condoned Dhanurdharas’ behavior

Rupa Vilasa: Asram teacher, violently beat the boys on a regular basis.

Raghunatha (Swami): Asram teacher, used to beat the children more than

Dhanurdhara himself, he is notorious for having been the most brutal and

violent

teacher in the history of the Vrindavana Gurukula.

Bhurijan: Gurukula teacher, minister of education, GBC and more recently

Guru, long standing friend of Dhanurdhara, did not make a significant effort to

 

protect the children from Dhanurdharas’ abuse. He used to regularly cane the

children when he was a teacher in Gita Nagari.

Kurma Rupa: Was an Asram teacher for a few years, he used to beat the boys in

random bursts of rage. One of his major mistakes was perhaps to allow Prahlad

to be a monitor in his Asram. Prahlad had carte blanche under Kurma Rupa,; he

was a boy from Nepal who had himself attended the Vrindavana Gurukula.

Prahlad was extremely cruel and violent; he used to sexually, physically and

emotionally victimize the boys. He also controlled the children with threats

that he

would put tantric curses on them if they didn’t do as he said.

Braj Bihari formerly Arjuna: “Stalwart protector of the children,” was one

of the first to partake in the child protection team in ISKCON and still

somewhat involved in the management of the Vrindavana Gurukula. On more than

one

occasion he failed his duty to protect the children, because the interest of

the

school as an institution was in conflict with the childrens’; to him the

reputation of the school has had priority over the welfare of the boys. Some

children went to report to him that Vaijantimala Mataji, one of the academic

teachers was beating the boys with a stick. He instructed them to keep it to

themselves and to stop complaining. Needless to say he did nothing to stop her.

When

he was teaching in Vrindavana I personally saw Braj Bihari beating the children

 

with a stick in his classroom.

Gauri das formerly Gudakesa: Asram teacher, used to beat the kids with

violent slaps and sticks. For over a year Gauri das, at the time a brahmacari,

was

sleeping in a room behind closed doors with his personal servant: a little

Nepali gurukula boy. Although there is no evidence that he sexually abused the

boy

it was, to say the least, unacceptable practice, especially taking into

consideration the history of abuse in Gurukulas.

Once one of Yasomatinandana’s sons complained to his father about Gauri’s

inappropriate behavior, after being confronted by Yasomatinandana, Gauri

somehow

decided that it was a good idea to teach the boy a lesson by locking him up

in a room for a week.

On a trip to Bombay a ten year old boy was throwing stones from the temple

roof onto some huts workers lived in, Gauri had him put his hands on a window

sill, while two boys were holding each of his hands down Gauri beat him

repeatedly on his back with a wooden plank.

On one particular incident Madan Mohan das (gurukuli) brought an incident to

the attention of the GBC. Gauri das had left bruises on the leg of one boy,

whom he had repeatedly beaten with a stick. Photos of the injury were supplied

to the GBC. The boy’s crime was that he had stolen some sweets from Vaijanti

Mala Mataji. Funny (or sadly) enough the GBC commissioned a very biased person

to investigate the incident: Braj Bihari. At the time he was very much involved

 

with the management of the Gurukula, unfortunately as mentioned earlier, he

was more interested in protecting Gauri than the children. Braj Bihari made no

attempt to remove Gauri.

When Gauri was questioned, he justified his actions by saying that the boy

had stolen from a brahmana; King Nrga had taken birth as a lizard for a similar

 

crime. Gauri’s view was that he had done the boy a very selfless favor: he

saved him a birth as a lizard……

After the enquiry, instead of deciding that such a man was unsuitable to care

for the children, the GBC issued a mandate that he could no longer hit the

children on his own, the temple president and the vice president now had to be

present (note that the GBC did not forbid the beating of the children). In

Gauri

’s words he claimed the GBC made him swallow the sour pie, it seems he was

disappointed that he could no longer whimsically beat the kids.

In a recent letter to a former student Gauri says: “Please name those from my

asram who were maltreated? It may rather be a case of those who were not in

my ashram who were largely misbehaved that didn’t like me. Indeed if there were

 

cases of maltreatment I will with all sincerity accept full rectification and

make heartfelt apologies”. I wish to remind to Gauri that the above incidents

were far from isolated and all the children involved were, at the time of the

incidents in his asram; they simply happened to be the most outrageous ones.

It must be noted that while Gauri was a teacher he beat the boys regularly for

all sorts of reasons. Some were beaten for talking back at him, some for

playing at the wrong time, others for disobeying him and yet others because

they

had been recommended for punishment by his monitors. (a monitor was a boy put

in charge of other boys) If you happened to be disliked by the monitor, you

were in trouble.

Gauri das is now the temple president at the Bhaktivedanta Manor, one of the

most prominent temples in ISKCON, he receives a wage of about US$ 60000 a year

complete with and enviable pension scheme from Prabhupada’s money for his “

service”. He is honored as a senior and respectable member of the community. He

 

has a contract that when he leaves, for two years he will receive the full

salary.

Let’s not forget the pedophiles: And then there was of course a host of

pedophiles who were both teachers and monitors over the years in the Vrindavana

 

Gurukula: Manihara, Shastra from Vancouver, Niragdeva, Anantarupa, Atmabhavana,

 

Premnidhi and many more. Surely they were not going to fight a war for the

children against Dhanurdhara’s ongoing abuse.

Over the years there have been some who attempted to expose and challenge the

inappropriate behavior of Dhanurdhara and his supporters. Invariably they

were expelled from service, often after having their character blemished. Any

man

with an ounce of integrity, who spoke up against the inappropriate behavior

of the Gurukula authorities, found himself antagonized and quickly ostracized.

In the later years while Dhanurdhara was principle of the Vrindavana Gurukula

the GBCs were; Jagadisha (Maharaj), Gopal Krisna Maharaj and Bhurijan, they

were all too aware of the continuous abuse to the children, yet they seemed to

have bigger and better things to dedicate their energies to for they did

nothing to correct Dhanurdhara’s behavior.

Dhanurdhara’s apology

I must confess that I am not impressed with Dhanurdhara’s letter of apology.

I do not find his claims, that he will lead a life of repentance, very

convincing. I find it hard to give him the benefit of the doubt that his

motives are

genuine seen as he did not apologize until he was forced to do so. He also

states that he wishes to leave Prabhupada’s movement, but yet he makes no

mention

of giving up the adoration, worship and financial security that comes with

being a Guru. That is too convenient; I don’t think he deserves the option to

leave so as to avoid the consequences to his actions. He never gave his victims

 

the possibility to leave when it was his turn to beat them. It would seem he

thinks it is fare and just for him to choose his own punishment or perhaps that

 

his karma will not find him outside ISKCON. Besides, he has not been actively

involved in ISKCON in the recent years; he has been preaching away from the

mainstream ISKCON projects, I don’t really see that it would be a sacrifice or

much of a punishment for him to “leave” ISKCON, maintaining his position as a

Guru, associating with his god brothers and with his disciples still in the

movement. In my judgment it is not a punishment fit for his crimes.

I challenge Dhanurdhara to remain and offer his service in Prabhupada’s

movement, begging for the forgiveness of the very devotees that he has hurt and

 

abused; they are the only ones who can forgive him. He must be willing to

accept

whatever punishment they see appropriate, whether that be to give up Sannyas,

Guru or something else. I Dare him to take responsibility for his past

mistakes. If he can do this I will be the first to pay my respects to him. In

my eyes

that will prove his qualifications to be a leader in our society. If he can’

t; he should question his motives for having been in this movement and doing

what he does. I believe that if he is sincerely repentant, no price is too high

 

to pay to attain the forgiveness of the vaisnavas.

Chandhigar Gurukula

The GBC at the time was Gopal Krisna Maharaja. The Chandigar Gurukula was a

very useful preaching tool as were all the other Gurukulas in India. It was

something Maharaj could show to Life Members and thus reassure them that their

money was well spent in “training vaisnavas.”

The Chandigar Gurukula there was short lived in comparison to the ones in

Vrindavana or Mayapur. The teachers were very young Indian brahmacharis,

disciples of Gopal Krisna. The abuse that took place in the Chandigar Gurukula

has not

been as well publicized because most of the kids there were Indian or

Russian. I cannot find it in me to give Gopal Krsna Maharaj the benefit of the

doubt

that he was unaware. It seems to me he was far too preoccupied with preaching

and management, for if he was concerned then something would have been done.

If a student in the Vrindavana Gurukula knows that abuse is taking place in

Chandigar is it not fair to question how the GBC of that Gurukula could be

ignorant. I am more inclined to think that the children’s welfare was less of a

 

priority to him.

There was one boy, an orphan, ten or twelve years old. His mentors decided to

send him there possibly because the fees were lower than in the Vrindavana

Gurukula. This boy stayed in Vrindavana for a while before moving to Chandigar.

 

I had the chance to get to know him a little, despite being an orphan he was a

lively, happy and playful boy. Then he left for the Chandigar Gurukula. When

I saw him a few months later; my heart cringed, there was no joy left in his

eyes, once very talkative and active, he now did not have anything to say, he

could not look at me in the eyes. In a short time he seemed to have aged far

beyond his years. He was not a carefree, innocent child any longer. His spirit

was broken. I was convinced something very ugly and violent had happened to

him. Looking at him then, I felt angry and helpless.

Bhaktividyapurna Swami

Here is a question I would like to ask: is Bhaktividyapurna Swami, formerly

Anirdhesh Vapu head of the Mayapur Gurukula, less guilty than Dhanurdhara?

Although there is no conclusive evidence that he has sexually abused any of the

 

children under his care. There is however, plenty of evidence that he was

violently beating the boys, in addition he made no significant attempts to

expel and

punish the many pedophile teachers and monitors that raped the children while

he was the principal of the school.

He is notorious for his expertise in lacerating the skin off the back of the

children with one single hit of his special bendy bamboo cane. He would get

the boys to kneel forward and hold their ankles with their hands, so as to form

 

an arch of some sort with their body. He would then hit the boys on the back,

causing the tip of the stick to whip around striking their chest. Many boys

recall that he preceded his beatings with a sadistic ritual intended to

increase

the fear of his victims. He would smile and wiggle his eyebrows gleefully

while bending the cane full circle and making whipping sounds with his mouth.

Several boys suffered shock after those canings.

The father of a prospective student questioned Bhaktividyapurna Swami about

the sexual abuse that was said to be taking place in the Mayapur Gurukula at

the time. Bhaktividyapurna Swami gave him what I call the “Kirtanananda stance

on sex”. He said something to the effect of, “sex, whether it is between you

and your wife, not intended for procreating, or between a teacher and a boy is

illicit: It is all sex”. As if morally and karmically they are on the same

level. This is from a man whose job is to protect and guide the children.

Why has he not acknowledged his mistakes and offered an apology? If he does

not feel he has done anything wrong, I am compelled to question his motives and

 

qualifications. Today Bhaktividyapurna Maharaj is an authorized initiating

Guru, Sannyas and still runs his own Gurukula in Mayapur specialized in “

training brahmanas.” The GBC decided a fit punishment for his crimes was to

temporarily suspend him from directly interacting with the children at his

school.

Personally I would like to know in what court of law such a punishment will be

considered appropriate and just.

In the non-devotee world “karmis” cringe on hearing about child abuse. Yet

in our vaisnava community, Gurus and Sannyasis have perpetrated child abuse and

 

condoned it for years and very few ever stood up to say “this is unacceptable.

” Why are we so apathetic as a society? What credibility does that give us as

a spiritual community? That we have calmly allowed these atrocities to take

place?

As aspiring Vaisnavas we must strive to be exemplary gentlemen before we can

call ourselves Vaisnavas. We should first reach the level of sattva guna and

then work our way up to shudda sattva, there is not enough emphasis in our

society to behave like respectable citizens. In fact we have condoned and

allowed

so many despicable acts to go unpunished that this movement has been a heaven

for criminals of every description. As a result some of our “pure devotees”

have behaved in ways that no decent and moral “karmi” would ever consider

acceptable.

Accountability of our Leaders

Jaya Pataka Swami has been the GBC for Mayapur since the beginning. If I am

to believe that he is less responsible than Dhanurdhara I want to know what he

has done over the years to protect the children. Although he did not

personally perpetrate abuse, he was negligent in his duty of care toward the

children

at least as much as Dhanurdhara. Once he randomly asked my father if he wanted

to be a teacher in the Gurukula, he didn’t even know my father. Given the

carelessness with which he enrolled teachers, it is no wonder that so many

atrocities took place. Anybody willing to do the job was readily welcomed with

little

or no screening. Sadly more often than not the volunteers for this job had

their own agendas.

Gurukulis have been beaten and tortured by Doyaram, former temple president

of Mayapur and Jaya Pataka Maharajs’ disciple. Similarly to Gopal Krsna

Maharaj, Jaya Pataka Maharaj did not make an effective attempt to protect the

children who over the years were being sexually, physically and psychologically

 

abused right under his nose. Again it seems that he was so busy traveling,

preaching and initiating disciples, that he was unable to properly carry out

his

responsibility as a guide and protector.

I know of one worker who was beaten to death for stealing money from the

restaurant’s cash register in Mayapur, his rib cage was crushed in by Jaya

Pataka

Swami’s Bengali disciples. If you have been unfortunate enough to witness the

beating of a thief in India you can easily picture how things get out of hand.

I was present in Mayapur when a pickpocket was caught stealing. It was near

the Samadhi during a festival, I saw this man tied on the floor bleeding

profusely while three of our ISKCON guards where repeatedly beating this man

with

two inch thick bamboo sticks. This man had visibly broken bones, bruises,

lacerated skin and giant blood blisters all over his body. As it is customary

in

India a crowd had gathered to watch the spectacle. They beat that pickpocket

within an inch of his life. That is when Jnanagamya, a senior Prabhupada

disciple

walked in on the scene. His reaction was to disperse the crowd and tell the

guards “At least don’t beat him here go someplace secluded”. I do not know what

 

happened to the man, but I can easily guess that if he wasn’t killed he will

be a crippled beggar for the rest of his life.

In this phrase by Jnanagamya I see ISKCON’s problem in a nut shell, nobody

cares if a person gets killed or if he is even guilty. For too long we have

only

been concerned with saving face. Appearances are more valued than substance.

It did not cross the mind of Jnanagamya to say stop, you are killing this man:

he was more concerned with what people might think.

Somehow it would seem we have had in place a system to sternly punish

pickpockets, but we worship and respect child abusing Swamis.

Gurus and GBC

Bhavananda (maharaj) as a Guru was a pedophile who habitually had sexual

intercourse with men and gurukula children. A boy burned down Bhavanada’s house

in

Australia. When the boy was questioned by the police he said that the owner

of the house had raped him. The local temple president testified in court that

it was impossible and the boy was sent to a juvenile prison. By the time the

boy was due to be released Bhavananda was no longer a Guru. Instead of

attempting to make amends the temple president involved became concerned over a

 

possible retaliation the boy might make against him. He was not at all

repentant or

empathetic for the child. In Vrindavana he once threw a boy from the first

floor balcony of the Gurukula building into the garden because the boy was

irritating him.

When Bhavananda (Maharaj) was the GBC, he was very close with Satadhanya

(Maharaj), who was at one time the main manager in Mayapur. At this time there

were Gurukula boys who were designated to be the “Swamis’ service boys” These

boys are known to have had to perform sexual services.

To this day Bhavananda gives classes and is offered respect and honor as a “

senior” Prabhupada disciple. When he comes to Mayapur he is allowed to give

class and still receives royal treatment. Why is it that nobody stands up to

say

that Bhavananda is not fit to take a sit of honor on the Vyasasan and be given

the authority to present the philosophy?

Nitai Chand Swami was a good friend of Bhavanada and Satadhanya when they

were in power. A while back on Chakra, devotees were asking to make Nitai Chand

a

Guru! Granted there is not sufficient evidence to prove that he is also a

pedophile, however in my eyes the simple fact that he did not speak up against

the perpetrators makes him guilty. It tells me a lot about his character.

The priorities of our society have thus far been all wrong; therefore ISKCONs’

future can only be very bleak. As a society we have failed to protect, guide

and inspire our children. The GBC is getting old, who will take over? It is

unlikely that many of ISKCONs’ children are going to feel much of a sense of

loyalty, belonging or inclination to step up.

The most likely people to take over are the devotees who joined between the

late seventies and the early eighties, unfortunately they are people such as

Braj Bihari and Gauri who have been trained in the old regime: they may simply

perpetuate the mistakes of the past. They are not in my opinion people who

will, when push comes to shove, make the “right” decision, especially if it is

not convenient, against their personal interests or if it would make them

unpopular.

Very recently one of our Gurus, Puri Maharaja formerly Balabhadra has been

found implementing a bizarre and perverted test to decide if the matajis at his

 

temple in Scotland were fit to become brahmacarinis or if they had to get

married. He was spending a lot of time alone with the some of the girls. They

had

to come to his room and show him (a sannyasi) their breasts. If they were too

big the girls had to get married and if they were small they could remain

brahmacarinis.

Aside his inappropriate interactions with women Puri Maharaj has an interest

in money and luxuries; he bought himself a £200.000 motor home; he has a

passion for expensive electric guitars; he has bought over 50 instruments with

some

of them costing up to £15000 each . All of this with laxmi that his disciples

have collected on the streets with their sweat and blood working 365 days a

year: surrendering it all supposedly to Krsna.

Sivarama Swami and Govinda Maharaj formerly Ayodyapati have known of this for

a long time yet they have not stopped or exposed him. I will agree that a

largely publicized scandal is not always the best way to deal with these

situations, but cover up is certainly not a better alternative. Why do they

allow him

to remain as a Sannyasi?

I want to know if it is because of their friendship or because of all the

money that Puri Maharaj has given them to support their projects. Do they think

 

Puri Maharaj has behaved in an acceptable way for a Sannyas? Do they think that

 

he is fit to be a Sannyasi? Where does their loyalty lie? Don’t they feel a

duty of care toward Prabhupada and the devotees that take shelter in ISKCON?

These people who in my eyes lack in basic material integrity are supposed to be

 

the infallible pure devotees who will guide us back to Godhead; I am at a

loss. Because they did not expose him they have chosen to protect Puri

Maharajs’

reputation over protecting the devotee community from being exploited by him

and men like him in the future.

Even though the GBC is now aware of the incidents nobody has asked Puri

Maharaj to step down from sannyas. Apparently because there is no evidence that

he

had sexual intercourse with these women he has not really fallen.

The only action taken has been to remove Puri Maharaj as the GBC/Temple

president in Scotland and relocate him to South Africa. We are allowing him to

start afresh, as if nothing happened, with no apparent consequences to his

actions.

Recently, Jayadvaita Swami mentioned that some of our initiating Gurus are

not even chanting their rounds. How can these people, in good conscience, ask

their disciples to vow to follow rules and regulations when they themselves are

 

not following. If these Gurus are allowed to continue, all the parties

involved will be sharing the blame; I feel that by neglecting his duty to

protect the

movement Jayadvaita Swami is doing a disservice to Srila Prabhupada.

As Vaisnavas we must strive to be more humble than a straw on the street, yet

some of our Gurus display an arrogance and pride that could easily match a

rock stars’. Why is it considered acceptable behavior for a model Vaisnava?

Somehow being what karmis call “a decent human being” is not a requirement

to be an infallible pure devotee in ISKCON, and yet we claim to be better!

If we are going to make a difference it will take courage. It will be

difficult because for too long the unacceptable has been the exemplary norm,

but if

there is to be any hope, we must gather the courage in ourselves to find and

implement a solution.

The following is a nice quote I have found on courage.

“The highest courage is to dare to be yourself in the face of adversity,

choosing right over wrong, ethics over convenience and truth over popularity.

These are the choices that measure your life. Travel the path of integrity

without

looking back for there is never a wrong time to do the right thing.”

This was written by somebody who probably never heard about Krsna, probably a

meat eater, if only we had been a little more like this man……

Most devotees know that Harikesa (Swami) left with a handsome payout. What

perhaps is not so know is how he came to be in possession of the money. At

least

part of the money came from a BBT trust: the leftovers of money Harikesa lost

on the Russian stock market after the mid ‘90s crash. A disciple of his was

one of the trustees. In order to release the funds Harikesa needed his

signature. Harikesa requested this devotee to give him the money, when this

devotee

refused to sign it over, Hariskesa had his loyal Russian disciples threaten to

kill this devotee and his family. This accounts for a portion of the 5million

plus US$ that Harikesa is said to have taken with him.

I think a good question to ask is, what is our responsibility in this, what

could we have done to prevent it from happening, and more importantly what do

we have to do to insure that it will never happen again? Is it appropriate that

 

Sannyasis manage millions of dollars?

The GBC body is structured as a self electing entity (Its members decide who

can join the club) unfortunately this leaves ample room for corruption. The

GBC body must be accountable and when need be its members must be judged by an

external and independent panel of senior devotees. The current closed circle

system has contributed to drain Prabhupada’s movement of its former purity,

justice, objectivity and strength.

By the lack of transparency and integrity, shown by some of the GBC members

the whole body is loosing credibility, day after day.

I believe money and political power would be much better placed in the hands

of Grihastas without vested interests: devotees who are spiritually,

financially and morally accomplished, with a proven and spotless track record.

Power must be given to those who do not seek it, and money to those that do

not need it. If a person is in financial need he is not likely to be a reliable

 

treasurer. It is so simple that we seem to have missed the point. Sannyasis

must not interact with women, Srila Prabhupada did not spend time alone with

his aged sister, not because he was at risk of a fall down, but to set the

example for us. Child abusers must not be teachers. Sannyasis should not be

managers.

I believe that the position of GBC comes with a duty to care, protect, serve

and safeguard the people and assets of Prabhupada’s movement. I feel that in

many instances the GBC has taken too lightly these duties. Harikesa was able to

 

steal so much money because we do not have appropriate measures to protect

our assets.

When somebody wants to become Guru or Sannyasi I become immediately

suspicious. The very desire to be a Guru or Sannyasi, can in itself be a

disqualification. Bhakti Visvambara Madhava Maharaja formerly Mahamantra das

pushed the GBC

for years and years to be awarded Sannysa. Surely Sannyas is not necessary to

preach, I ask myself what is the motivation? Perhaps we have changed the

duties and qualities we associate with the position of Sannyas.

Today, a successful sannyasi in ISKCON can have more power, fame, adoration,

prestige and less accountability than some of the presidents and prime

ministers in the karmi world. It is no surprise that everyone wants to join the

club.

A successful swami can have a fabulous career full of attractive material

benefits.

I do not see anybody pushing to be an austere madhukari (begging for one’s

food daily) as has been the traditional role of a Sannyasi. To uplift the

consciousness of society, a Sannyasi must renounce worldly possessions and

travel,

his duty being to serve society not to be served. No Sannyasi has ever been

known to have a personal bank account before our Swamis set the trend.

Tamal Krsna Maharaj left a hefty inheritance to Giriraj Swami. Why did Tamal

Krsna Maharaj not put ISKCON in his will instead? Perhaps he did not trust

that ISKCON would utilize his money for a worthy cause. ISKCON ought to have a

level of financial transparency that its members can be confident and reassured

 

when donating their material wealth before departing this world. Imagine how

many resources could be gathered. The lack of integrity that we have had over

the years has created a lot of distrust, much to the detriment of the society

at large.

It is not my intent to discount the priceless service that these devotees

have done for Prabhupada, I am concerned because most of the people I have

mentioned are, or have been leaders of our society, and their behavior will be

seen

as exemplary and perhaps appropriate conduct from their subordinates. I

believe it is of the outmost importance that when a mistake is committed it is

publicly acknowledged and the people involved be held accountable. I see this

as

the only way to prevent history from repeating itself.

Here is another inspirational quote I have found on leadership, “A true

leader has the confidence to stand alone, the courage to make tough decisions,

and

the compassion to listen to the needs of others. He does not set out to be a

leader, but becomes one by the quality of his actions and the integrity of his

intent.” I would like this standard to be expected and required of our

leaders.

I propose that the definition of Sannyas be redefined and explained.

Candidates should donate their personal money to the society, and walk into the

 

sannyas asrama completely dependant on Krsna and the Vaisnavas. I believe this

would

cause less of a rush to get on board, and the relationship between the

Sannyasis and the rest of the Vaisnava community would be much more friendly

and

respectful.

Our duty as devotees is to serve, and our spiritual accomplishments should be

measured by how pleasing our service is to the family of Vaisnavas. If they

are unhappy we are doing something wrong.

Many times I have been told that I had to keep the scandals in ISKCON to

myself, if things would be known devotees would loose faith in Prabhupada’s

movement. Today I have come to the conclusion that with my silence I am an

accomplice to the problem. Because scandals in ISKCON have been covered up

people have

lost faith in the movement. I believe that failure to report a crime is itself

a crime. As a society we are in part responsible of our leaders’ mistakes, if

we do not make an effort to prevent the same mistakes from taking place

again. It is everyone’s duty to protect ISKCON from abuse exploitation, deviant

 

philosophies and practices.

Protecting abusers and thus allowing them to continue abusing makes us silent

accomplices. I urge all the devotees that with their silence have allowed and

are allowing abuse to take place to come forward and speak.

Our leaders must become accountable to the society not simply between

themselves; spiritually, morally and financially, there is no transparency at

this

stage. This lack of transparency ultimately affects the GBC body and the

society

as a whole; it leaves too much room for exploitation and corruption,

resulting in a lack of purity and trust in the system.

I believe in ISKCON we have a desperate need; to drastically raise the

benchmark of what is considered acceptable, and of what is the ideal behavior

for a

Vaisnava.

An eloquent speaker or a good singer does not equal a good devotee. Likewise

a good devotee does not make a good singer, speaker, teacher or manager.

Deception is harmful both to the leaders’ spiritual life and to the followers

that

are being misguided. You can’t cheat your way into the spiritual world, Krsna

is the biggest cheater.

The most worrisome aspect of the situation is that what is mentioned in this

letter is but a glimpse of the actual picture of abuse and misuse of power

that has and is taking place within our society. I suspect the true magnitude

of

the problem is something a lot more frightening.

All the people I have mentioned have one thing in common, to the best of my

knowledge none of them have to this day shown the decency to come forward to

acknowledge and apologize for their mistakes. I have never known of an ISKCON

leader to come forward while in power and say “Dear Vaisnavas I have failed in

my service to you, I have abused your trust and I have made many mistakes,

please forgive me, I submit myself to your judgment and I am prepared to accept

 

your advice and whatever atonement you see fit.”

My question is still on the table, "Why are we ganging up on Dhanurdhara? "I

am inclined to think that most devotees who have been in the movement long

enough, at least subconsciously are aware that there is something fundamentally

 

wrong with the way our society is run. Dhanurdhara happens to be the person who

 

represents the problem. He is today’s scapegoat. It is easy to hate and

despise a child abuser write a few lines and perhaps have him exiled from the

society that would make some of us feel better; the problem has been

externalized

and fixed. Our conscience can rest at least for a while, we can decline our

share of responsibility. We are good people and he is bad.

I believe fixing the “Dhanurdhara” problem is more work than it may seem at

first and I hope that this letter will encourage devotees to seek and create

solutions with the same enthusiasm shown thus far.

I want to hope that by reading this, devotees will be inspired to help

reform, redefine and protect Srila Prabhupadas’ movement. It will be a long

journey

which begins with acknowledging and working on our own anarthas first and

taking responsibility for our mistakes.

If we as individuals do not change for the better the society as a whole will

change for the worse, we will soon be another big religious institution

living lies and hypocrisy.

I offer my apologies to all Vaisnava who feel offended by this imperfect

attempt to better our movement.

Hare Krsna

Thank you for reading

Your servant

If anyone wishes to contact me you may do so at gurukulidas