Guest guest Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 > > This is a different argument! It's about whether or not an objective > > world, including an objective moral standard, can exist if God > > exists. > > Objective to whom? These atheists want to postulate a law beyond > Krishna. This would lead to an infinite regress fallacy ('who created > that law?' etc. since laws imply a lawgiver). > > Our position is always subjective to dharma and Krishna. Krishna > defines dharma, follows it and protects it but also shows that He is > beyond it (creation cannot be higher than its creator). Another thing is that no objectivity can exist without God. The individual living entity is by definition subjective, and he cannot excape his subjective nature without the aid of God. Many atheists claim to be objective, but in their ignorance they forget that this is merely their subjective viewpoint. In fact, only an absolute God can be objective, and then again this is from our point of view. From Krishna's point of view He is also subjective, but His subjectivism becomes our objectivism. If He doesn't define objective reality for us, we are forever trapped by our individual subjective viewpoints. ys, jdd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.