solipsism turns into [can a painted fisher catch real fish?]

[Guest guest]

He only wants to point out that the universe needs a "limited"

watcher to arise into a "limited" existence, as much as the observer

needs the universe, this what appears as emergence also exists

before it actually manifests, beyond normal dual space/time time, and

also in the junctions inbetween, in a "smeared" or "blurred" state,

where the limited observer, the observed and the act of

observance,are merged and cannot be identified as seperate, and that

this underlying "smeared state" has the nature of bliss because it

has not yet decided what it is or will become and thus contains in a

latent state all the diverse possibilities the universe can ever

manifest so there is in this state as yet no frustration/sorrow,

though awareness is already existing. (contrary to Buddhism where

awareness of this state is denied to exist)

 

Though this "latent state" is ever continually present also during

the actualization of the universe when it is not disappearing because

of its nature which transcends time and space it is not a creation

that exists somewhere before the universe came into being, but the

universe in a sense is coming into being constantly, and because of

the holographic nature of consciousness it is also appearing in any

sense experience of small units (not only one creative God/Goddess)

( human beings or rocks aynthing contain a refelction of the whole)

but we are unaware of it, having become attached to the actualized

already fully emerged duality of experience act of experiencing and

object of experience.

We never see the canvas and the paint, (the universe/observer

duality in a blurred latent state), only the actualized painting

where the observer (chit)is distinct from existence(sat).

 

A human being can best tap this state (and bliss=ananda) when for a

fragment of a second, during the time awareness shifts from one

object to the next, his universe is created, but an average human

being will fall into deep sleep or unciousness during that tiny

fragment of time.

 

 

Staying awake-aware during these tiny time-fragments is a major key.

 

 

 

, "willendorfer"

<willendorfer wrote:

>

> I came across the following quote from Guru Sri Amritananda Natha:

>

> "The world is a myth that is created out of nothing. Who is

creating this world? Yourself.

> Where was this world before you were born? It was not there. Where

it is going to go after

> you are gone? It is not there. That is the concept of Sachidananda.

Sat is existence. Existence

> - there is no validity or proof that it exists without

consciousness. Consciousness has no

> existence without existence itself. So, there is an equation

between Sat and Chit. Sat is called

> Shiva and Chit is called Shakthi. They are inseparable, although

they appear to be separate.

> Their inseparableness is Ananda. That is the fundamental theorem,

we can say, that ?I am the

> world?. ?I = WORLD?. These are all called Triputis."

>

> My question: is this different from solipsism (the position that

nothing exists outside of one's

> own mind), and if so, how?

>