devils advocate or Devil, incarnate ?

[Guest guest]

the recent rebuttal to his own statements posted by dev swa on his website seems to raise as many questions as it purports to answer.

rather than call himself a liar, he now claims that his statements were but an expression of the doubts of others that he sought to lay to rest.

 

"Maharaja Pariksit... wanted the great sages assembled there to unanimously give their verdict on his conviction so that he might be able to go on with his confirmed duty without controversy. Similarly,...us...observed consternation in some of audience and thus queried Sukadava Goswami--for the sake of others. "

 

" Midway through it, though, I did air what I consider to be worrisome issues, which I know have been bubbling in various places and times of Prabhupada's movement."

 

failure, it seems, is lately the only option. now claiming his demoniac statements were but an inquiry that was voiced by many others, one wonders how it is that maharaj doesn't post the KRSNA conscious answer that he gave the fools and rascals that would harbor such malice toward Srila Prabhupada's mission. as he still, at best. can only 'formulate the question', we see that he cannot produce the answers required, lest this whole discussion would be moot.

 

had he defeated these clearly bogus proposals, in a perfect questions, perfect answers type format, he would now have a book that would be worth reading. we read his printings of bhaktipada bullets and other such sweetness and we've even reread his vyasa-puja offerings to k swa during THE GREAT 8 missing years of dev swa, 1986-1994. like the defamation of Srila Prabhupada's books that he posted over four years ago, as an offering to his Spiritual Master on His appearance day, we find these items to be far more condemning than exonerating.

 

"everything i do, i do for Srila Prabhupada" has long been the mantra of the sahajiyas that were a cross section of Srila Prabhupada's ashram, but the facts rarely support the retelling afterwards. so it is with this individuals constantly changing positions and points of view. his staying with k swa for all those years was only so that he could 'save NV for ISKCON'. if this be true and he single handedly saved the place of pilgrimage from take over by the US government security agencies, then he is truly a world class hero and should be praised by all devotees on this planet immediately.

 

if, however, just the opposite is true of his behavior, then exactly the opposite should be his result. we humbly request whoever has the facilities to make this issue a concern of highest priority. has New Vrndaban that dev swa and radhanath slipped back into ISKCON with been co-opted by the US government in exchange for radhanath's freedom, or not? do government agents routinely hold positions of authority at NV? don't dev swa and radhanath guarantee the US government that NV will never pose a threat again in exchange for a "not able to prosecute" status on the justice department and the FBI's lists? how else did they achieve such immunity? don't each of the 'felons in charge' at NV owe their positions to dev swa and radhanath(with the subserviance of surpanaka from their henchlady, malati swami)? who is the new australlian TP at NV brought in to replace an absconding kuladri and narada muni das's? to whom does he suggest that new initiates seek diksa initiation? why does the NV website not even mention this major event? is it not like when the devotees wake up to find out that temple president has absconded with the temple treasury, a hot brahmacharini(in somes cases, a hot brahmachari), and the best vehicle in the house? isn't it EXACTLY LIKE THAT? isn't that what just happened at New Vrndaban? and what will anyone do about it? we're holding our breath until we find out !!!