Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 LIFE DIVINE AND THE SUPREME SELF With heartfelt love and devotion, the devotee propitiates God; and when he is blessed with His vision and grace, he feels ever happy in His presence. The constant presence establishes a virtual identity between the two. While seeking the presence of the Supreme Soul, the Bhakta renounces all associations in his life, from the meanest to the best, and having purged his being of all associations, he automatically wins the association with the Supreme Self. One who has attained to the position of unstinted emancipation can never be disliked by others, for the people themselves are the very Self-luminous soul, though ignorant of the fact. In this world of immense variety, different beings are suffering from different kinds of ailments, and yet they are not prepared to give up the physical frame, even when wailing under physical and mental pain. If this be so, then men will not be so short-sighted as to avoid their savior, the enlightened soul. That overflowing reservoir of bliss, the beatific soul, does confer only bliss on the people by his loving light. Even the atmosphere around him heartens the suffering souls. He is like the waters of a lake that gives nourishment to the plants and trees around the brink and the grass and fields nearby. The Saint gives joy and sustaining energy to the people around him. ============================================================= from Self Knowledge and Self Realization by Nisargadatta Maharaj http://itisnotreal.com/Self-Knowledge.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2006 Report Share Posted November 15, 2006 "One who has attained to the position of unstinted emancipation can never be disliked by others" "The Saint gives joy and sustaining energy to the people around him." Well, so does a hot fudge sundae, and we could ask, so what? Human experience is dualistic and the mind will cling to this joy dispensed by the saint. The Truth shall set you free, not dualistic "joy, bliss and loving light". Is this to imply that the sword of Truth is an inappropriate teaching tool and if the guru is "disliked", he can't be awakened? Am I getting Niz out of context here? Phil In a message dated 11/14/2006 5:28:08 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, shaantih (AT) comcast (DOT) net writes: LIFE DIVINE AND THE SUPREME SELF With heartfelt love and devotion, the devotee propitiates God; and when he is blessed with His vision and grace, he feels ever happy in His presence. The constant presence establishes a virtual identity between the two. While seeking the presence of the Supreme Soul, the Bhakta renounces all associations in his life, from the meanest to the best, and having purged his being of all associations, he automatically wins the association with the Supreme Self. One who has attained to the position of unstinted emancipation can never be disliked by others, for the people themselves are the very Self-luminous soul, though ignorant of the fact. In this world of immense variety, different beings are suffering from different kinds of ailments, and yet they are not prepared to give up the physical frame, even when wailing under physical and mental pain. If this be so, then men will not be so short-sighted as to avoid their savior, the enlightened soul. That overflowing reservoir of bliss, the beatific soul, does confer only bliss on the people by his loving light. Even the atmosphere around him heartens the suffering souls. He is like the waters of a lake that gives nourishment to the plants and trees around the brink and the grass and fields nearby. The Saint gives joy and sustaining energy to the people around him. ============================================================= from Self Knowledge and Self Realization by Nisargadatta Maharaj _http://itisnotreal.com/Self-Knowledge.html_ (http://itisnotreal.com/Self-Knowledge.html) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2006 Report Share Posted November 15, 2006 Yes, you are getting Niz out of context here. You also are seeing his writing soon after his full realization and anointing. In the book I AM THAT the issue you raise is dealt with more clearly. Fundamentally "like" or "dislike" are concepts and a function of the mind and the result of clinging to a self with a body, or rather, clinging to the body as the self. The issue of the relationship with the Guru is constantly being raised in all of the transcripts of sessions with him. In effect if the relationship between a "guru" and a "disciple" goes sour there never was a real guru relationship in the first place. The idea that there is a "guru" and something different called a "disciple" is again a set of concepts, words to satisfy the needs of communication and the mind. In absolute reality there is no such distinction. Further that which is impermanent is only temporary and so hot fudge sundaes are not fundamentally real so any pleasure derived is illusory. The relationship with the guru is of a quite different order of "liking". Why? Because it is precisely unitive and beyond concepts. In Nizzy's terms any "Guru" in the body is also temporary and its value is to point to what is real and unchanging, which is already and always present, being beyond "time" which is also a mental construct. Again he makes this clear in I AM THAT, and more especially in the sessions in the last two years of his life. Layman John , souldreamone wrote: > > > "One who has attained to the position of unstinted emancipation can never be > disliked by others" > "The Saint gives joy and sustaining energy to the people around him." > > > Well, so does a hot fudge sundae, and we could ask, so what? Human > experience is dualistic and the mind will cling to this joy dispensed by the saint. > The Truth shall set you free, not dualistic "joy, bliss and loving light". Is > this to imply that the sword of Truth is an inappropriate teaching tool and > if the guru is "disliked", he can't be awakened? Am I getting Niz out of > context here? > > Phil > > > > > In a message dated 11/14/2006 5:28:08 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > shaantih writes: > > > LIFE DIVINE AND THE SUPREME SELF > > With heartfelt love and devotion, the devotee propitiates God; and when he > is blessed with His vision and grace, he feels ever happy in His presence. The > constant presence establishes a virtual identity between the two. While > seeking the presence of the Supreme Soul, the Bhakta renounces all associations > in his life, from the meanest to the best, and having purged his being of all > associations, he automatically wins the association with the Supreme Self. > One who has attained to the position of unstinted emancipation can never be > disliked by others, for the people themselves are the very Self-luminous soul, > though ignorant of the fact. > In this world of immense variety, different beings are suffering from > different kinds of ailments, and yet they are not prepared to give up the physical > frame, even when wailing under physical and mental pain. If this be so, then > men will not be so short-sighted as to avoid their savior, the enlightened > soul. > That overflowing reservoir of bliss, the beatific soul, does confer only > bliss on the people by his loving light. Even the atmosphere around him heartens > the suffering souls. He is like the waters of a lake that gives nourishment > to the plants and trees around the brink and the grass and fields nearby. The > Saint gives joy and sustaining energy to the people around him. > ============================================================= > from Self Knowledge and Self Realization by Nisargadatta Maharaj > _http://itisnotreal.com/Self-Knowledge.html_ > (http://itisnotreal.com/Self-Knowledge.html) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2006 Report Share Posted November 16, 2006 Okay. Thanks for clarifying. Phil In a message dated 11/15/2006 2:37:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, johnrloganis writes: Yes, you are getting Niz out of context here. You also are seeing his writing soon after his full realization and anointing. In the book I AM THAT the issue you raise is dealt with more clearly. Fundamentally "like" or "dislike" are concepts and a function of the mind and the result of clinging to a self with a body, or rather, clinging to the body as the self. The issue of the relationship with the Guru is constantly being raised in all of the transcripts of sessions with him. In effect if the relationship between a "guru" and a "disciple" goes sour there never was a real guru relationship in the first place. The idea that there is a "guru" and something different called a "disciple" is again a set of concepts, words to satisfy the needs of communication and the mind. In absolute reality there is no such distinction. Further that which is impermanent is only temporary and so hot fudge sundaes are not fundamentally real so any pleasure derived is illusory. The relationship with the guru is of a quite different order of "liking". Why? Because it is precisely unitive and beyond concepts. In Nizzy's terms any "Guru" in the body is also temporary and its value is to point to what is real and unchanging, which is already and always present, being beyond "time" which is also a mental construct. Again he makes this clear in I AM THAT, and more especially in the sessions in the last two years of his life. Layman John , souldreamone wrote: > > > "One who has attained to the position of unstinted emancipation can never be > disliked by others" > "The Saint gives joy and sustaining energy to the people around him." > > > Well, so does a hot fudge sundae, and we could ask, so what? Human > experience is dualistic and the mind will cling to this joy dispensed by the saint. > The Truth shall set you free, not dualistic "joy, bliss and loving light". Is > this to imply that the sword of Truth is an inappropriate teaching tool and > if the guru is "disliked", he can't be awakened? Am I getting Niz out of > context here? > > Phil > > > > > In a message dated 11/14/2006 5:28:08 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > shaantih writes: > > > LIFE DIVINE AND THE SUPREME SELF > > With heartfelt love and devotion, the devotee propitiates God; and when he > is blessed with His vision and grace, he feels ever happy in His presence. The > constant presence establishes a virtual identity between the two. While > seeking the presence of the Supreme Soul, the Bhakta renounces all associations > in his life, from the meanest to the best, and having purged his being of all > associations, he automatically wins the association with the Supreme Self. > One who has attained to the position of unstinted emancipation can never be > disliked by others, for the people themselves are the very Self-luminous soul, > though ignorant of the fact. > In this world of immense variety, different beings are suffering from > different kinds of ailments, and yet they are not prepared to give up the physical > frame, even when wailing under physical and mental pain. If this be so, then > men will not be so short-sighted as to avoid their savior, the enlightened > soul. > That overflowing reservoir of bliss, the beatific soul, does confer only > bliss on the people by his loving light. Even the atmosphere around him heartens > the suffering souls. He is like the waters of a lake that gives nourishment > to the plants and trees around the brink and the grass and fields nearby. The > Saint gives joy and sustaining energy to the people around him. > ============================================================= > from Self Knowledge and Self Realization by Nisargadatta Maharaj > _http://itisnotreal.com/Self-Knowledge.html_ > (http://itisnotreal.com/Self-Knowledge.html) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.