Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Dear sri vaishNava perunthagaiyeer, In this world, we have come across many types of `requests' from many sources and varieties of `help seekers'. These may include people seeking monetary help, seeking recommendation letters etc. Similarly even while praying to the supreme lord sriman naaraayaNan, varieties are available – prayer for health, for money, for success in examinations, and for success in love as per modern practice etc. Many a prayers may be for one's own purpose most often, or for the sake of others sometimes. In those days, similar prayers and seeking helps were done in the form of `yagnaas' – offering many a material in fire, so that the desired `fruit' – `yagna phala' is achieved. Since these yagnaas are to be done with strict procedural formalities as stated in the vEdhaas, and with proper manthraas, the braahmaNaas [or the rithviks as they are called], who were the qualified ones to do these yagnaas, were regarded highly and also paid highly and handsome. Kings, to get a success in war, to get rain in their country etc, conducted these yagnaas at high costs. The aswamEdha is one such yagna, for instance, is carried out by kings like dhasaratha as per srimadh raamaayaNam, yudhishtira as per maha bhaaratham. But have you heard a `son in law' performing a `yagna' for getting a `son' as the yagna phala for the sake of his `father in law'? – viz. his father in law, since not having a child [other than the daughter to whom this son in law was married to], wants the son in law to perform a yagna, on behalf of father in law, so that he will get a child - [is it a bit confusing?] – or this son in law brahmaNa doing a yagna for getting a `brother in law' - a `machinan' – as asked by the father in law who is the king, a kshathriya – to put that in tamil – raajaa aana maamanaarkku aaN kuzhandhai illai, adhukkaaga braahmaNa maappiLLai oru yagnam paNNina kadhai kEttu irukkireergaLaa? May be this question leads to a `high suspense'? No, sirs and madams, it is all simple. The story is all about our pet and beloved `raama' – yes – it is all about our pet "mother seethaa's beloved husband raama", the `dhaasarathee' only. `Hey, what happened to MGV, he is trying to twist the well known raamaayaNam' – you may think. Perhaps many may say when did dhasaratha get a daughter? Is there any evidence in raamaayaNam? Let us travel slowly to unravel these kind of twists. King dhasaratha of ayOdhyaa had 350 wives. On this figure of 350, you may raise a question – hey we have heard dhasaratha had 60000 wives and you have drastically reduced the number. To deal that 60000 part of story – Parasuraama who vowed to kill all kshathriyaas, in particular, the kings, also gave a concession that when he travels across lands and approaches to kill some king, he finds that king is a freshly married one, then, raama will not kill that king. Dhasaratha ruled ayodhyaa for 60000 years for which adequate references are available from vaalmeeki. So, dhasaratha married one wife in each year, so that whenever parasuraama comes to kill him, he appeared as a newly married man to parasuraama and thus escaped being killed by raama. Vaalmeeki does not cover any such portion of story in his kaavyam – raamaayaNam – may be some traces elsewhere. That is that 60000 nos story. We have a slokam in ayodhyaa kaaNdam on this 350 but not on 60000. Whether this 350 includes the three patta mahishis – queens - kousalyaa, sumithraa, and kaikEyee or they form additional three is a point of debate. Raama is set to leave for forest – king dhasaratha wants all his wives to assemble in the palace from which raama is set to take off. Sumanthra the minister fetches all of them to one palace. sumanthra aanaya mE dhaaraan yE kEchith iha maamakaa: | dhaarai: parivrutha: sarvai: dhrashtum ichchhaami raaghavam || 2-34-10 meaning: Oh, Sumanthra! Call [or bring] all my wives, who are here. Surrounded by all of them, I want to see the virtuous Raama. Evam ukthaa: sthriyaa: sarvaa: sumanthrENa nrupa aaj~nayaa | Prachakramu: thath bhavanam bharthu: aaj~naaya saasanam || 2-34-12 meaning: All those women, asked thus by Sumanthra as per the king's orders, went to his palace, after knowing the instructions of their husband. ardha saptha sathaa: thaa: thu pramadhaa: thaamra lOchanaa: | kousalyaam parivaarya atha sanai: jagmur dhruda vrathaa: || 2-34-13 meaning: Encircling Kousalya, three hundred fifty women, steadfast in their vow (of devotion to their husband), with their eyes reddened, went there slowly. Point: So now it is evidently confirmed that dhasaratha had 353 or 350 wives. From the slokam above we can even take that 350 is exclusive of the three, since it is stated here 350 encircled kousalya – so naturally kousalya is excluded, so also the other two queens. Or we can also take it that since it is poetry, the figure of 350 need not be so literally taken [or cannot be interpreted that way]. Dear readers, is it clear now? Now let us move on to see about dhasarathaa's daughter – the same sumanthra, the minister, informs king dhasaratha when the king wants to beget a son, rishyasringa: thu jaamaathaa puthraan thava vidhaasyathi | sanathkumaara kathitham Ethaavath vyaahrutham mayaa || 1-9-19 meaning: Sage Risyasringa, son-in-law of Romapaadha, King of Anga, and as well as to you, if invited to our kingdom, he will bless you to beget sons, oh! King... so said Sage Sanathkumaara to other sages and all this is retold by me." [Thus the charioteer and the Minister Sumantra completed his narration in confidence to King Dhasaratha.] [1-9-19] Point: from this it is clear that dhasaratha should have had a daughter and he did not, really and factually, have a son only. So the maappillai rishyasringa: did the `puthra kaama ishti' – the yagna yielding or resulting in a son – on behalf of his maamanaar and thus got 4 machinans in the form of raama, lakshmaNa, bharatha and chathrughna. Morein next post. Dhasan Vasudevan m.g. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.