Guest guest Posted November 21, 2006 Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 Namaste Vish and Tanmaya, thank you for this interesting discussion and I am also very interested in what Swamiji says about the matter. Just a thought: what Vish said, about laughing at undesirable thoughts or emotions as they present themselves and taking their appearance as a game, seems to me to be a valuable way to 'disarm' them. It made me think of a story about a brother wearing a bear mask, trying to frighten his little sister. This only worked as long as she did not recognize her beloved brother. As soon as she saw it was him and laughed, he took off the mask and hugged her. As we are told that there is nothing but the Guru, surely these thoughts and emotions that bother or scare us, are only masks. We can say 'look, you got me going there for a while, but now I see it is You, you can show me your real face and hug me.' Or we can run home and call our Mom, with love, Henny , "inspectionconnection108" <inspectionconnection108 wrote: > > Namaste Tanmaya > > I appreciate your comment about offering love to dark thoughts. I sat > and thought about it for some time, read some of the Kasyapa Sutras, > and analyzed my recent attempts to "stop, look, and listen" when a > thought or emotion or mood arises which takes we away from my goal. > > For example, there is a habit in me to become frustrated and > emotionally agitated very quickly when things "do not go right". I > loose control and create disharmony around me. Not life supporting. > > Now, as I have been "consciously watching" this thought arise and > begin to take hold of me, over the past several weeks, I realized it > was just an old habit, and the ego's attempt to control situations, > rather than to accept what happened and flow with it. In plain word, > trust the universe rather than fight it. > > In that context, I could view the thought as a hateful thing, to be > crushed and killed, or, the ego playing its game in order to keep > control and create disharmony. > > So, I made the attempt to view it, and accept it, as a game, and > laughted at it and its folly, and felt some slight love for it. > > This seemed to take some of the sting out of it and it subsided and > quietness dominated that much quicker. The love felt much better than > self loathing and disgust and the positive energy does not "add fuel > to the fire" of a negative emotion. > > Now, I cannot vouch for this being a teaching of Maa, but it came to > me in a quiet way, as a result of the "stop, look, and listen" > technique I have been using. So, I followed it and it felt right. > > > Now, I am working on inserting the proper mantra when the improper > mood arises, repeating the mantra most descriptive of the negative > emotion, then, using the mantra representing the positive emotion. The > goal: to insert the positive emotion in place of the negative one. > > This is the technique taught in the 4th Kashyapa Sutra > > I will ask Swami about giving a negative thought love. > > Jai Maa, Jai Swami > > love > > vishweshwar > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vish, > > > > You might want to check that one with the Guru's first: to offer love to > > thoughts which one recognizes to be dark, contracted, and wholly > > negitive. I don't offer a contrary opinion--just that it would be good > > to check. I would love to hear the answer. > > > > Respectfully' > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > That is a great goal- to offer love to those thoughts which veer us > > > from our goal. When Maa Chandi slays the Great Ego, She sends him to > > > Heaven not to a lower world. > > > > > > With this new technique from Sutra 4, we should be able to effectively > > > witness one unhealthy emotions change into life supporting ones. > > > > > > Thanks for reminding me of the Goal > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > love > > > Vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > , "kaliananda_saraswati" > > > kaliananda_saraswati@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > Kasyapa Sutra 4 says ........"It is our own attachment which makes > > > > for cloudy judgement. It is just our ignorant attachments which > > > > make for a lack of discrimination. The ego is very subtle and will > > > > try to trick us. But by constant vigilance we can gain control, > > > > self-mastery, and a greater degree of efficiency. Then we will > > > > attempt to satisfy only those desires which will produce the fruit > > > > of knowledge, not the fruit of ignorance." > > > > > > > > Join us in offering peace and love to those thoughts and attitudes > > > > that veer us from our goal. > > > > > > > > Jai Maa > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > Today in our discussion group on the live chat, we discussed an > > > > > amazing technique for releasing ourselves from the bondage of > > > > > behaviors which take us away from our goal of self realization. > > > > > On page 39 of the Kasyapa Sutras, we discovered that specific > > > > mantras > > > > > can be used to control emotions and behaviors. There are mantras > > > > > which correspond to specific emotions, such as sorrow, lust, > > > > doubt, etc. > > > > > By repeating those mantras, you gain control of the specific > > > > emotion. > > > > > Then, you can recite the mantra of the attitude you wish to > > replace > > > > > the emotion with. For example, peace, dharma, forgiveness, > > > > abundance, > > > > > light, pleasure, etc. > > > > > > > > > > For example, repeat one mala of bham, confusion, then another mala > > > > of > > > > > sam, peace. In this way you can watch confusion transform into > > > > peace. > > > > > > > > > > It is so simple, so practical, and so profound. Those of us in > > the > > > > > group today all took a sankalpa of watching our emotions, and when > > > > a > > > > > non-life supporting emotion rears its head, we will repeat the > > > > mantra > > > > > of it, then replace it with the positive attitude by repeating > > that > > > > > mantra. > > > > > > > > > > I wish I could list all the mantras, but there are too many. I > > > > hope > > > > > you can all obtain a copy of the book: Shree Maa: the Guru and > > the > > > > > Goddess and try this technique. > > > > > > > > > > Those of us practicing this technique, will share our discoveries > > > > on > > > > > line. Please join. The more of us practicing together, the > > > > stronger > > > > > the influence. > > > > > > > > > > I thank Maa and Swami for giving us this gift, another pearl of > > > > wisdom > > > > > to add to string of pearls hanging around our necks. > > > > > Please make me worthy of this gift, and increase my devotion and > > > > bring > > > > > devotion to our entire Devi Mandir family, and thru our family, > > and > > > > > the families of our families, bring pure devotion and peace to > > this > > > > > entire Uni- Verse. > > > > > One undivided verse, the refrain of the song of God. The eternal > > > > love > > > > > song which pervades every note sung, and fills every heart with > > > > bliss, > > > > > Jai Maa. > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2006 Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 Dear All, This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it as far as you (collectively) wish. It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, etc. In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of interest. In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as archetypes. Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own Chandi. One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? Respectfully, Tanmaya , "henny_v_i" <henny_v_i wrote: > > Namaste Vish and Tanmaya, > > thank you for this interesting discussion and I am also very > interested in what Swamiji says about the matter. > Just a thought: what Vish said, about laughing at undesirable thoughts > or emotions as they present themselves and taking their appearance as > a game, seems to me to be a valuable way to 'disarm' them. It made me > think of a story about a brother wearing a bear mask, trying to > frighten his little sister. This only worked as long as she did not > recognize her beloved brother. As soon as she saw it was him and > laughed, he took off the mask and hugged her. As we are told that > there is nothing but the Guru, surely these thoughts and emotions that > bother or scare us, are only masks. We can say 'look, you got me going > there for a while, but now I see it is You, you can show me your real > face and hug me.' Or we can run home and call our Mom, > > with love, > Henny , "inspectionconnection108" > inspectionconnection108@ wrote: > > > > Namaste Tanmaya > > > > I appreciate your comment about offering love to dark thoughts. I > sat > > and thought about it for some time, read some of the Kasyapa Sutras, > > and analyzed my recent attempts to "stop, look, and listen" when a > > thought or emotion or mood arises which takes we away from my goal. > > > > For example, there is a habit in me to become frustrated and > > emotionally agitated very quickly when things "do not go right". I > > loose control and create disharmony around me. Not life supporting. > > > > Now, as I have been "consciously watching" this thought arise and > > begin to take hold of me, over the past several weeks, I realized it > > was just an old habit, and the ego's attempt to control situations, > > rather than to accept what happened and flow with it. In plain > word, > > trust the universe rather than fight it. > > > > In that context, I could view the thought as a hateful thing, to be > > crushed and killed, or, the ego playing its game in order to keep > > control and create disharmony. > > > > So, I made the attempt to view it, and accept it, as a game, and > > laughted at it and its folly, and felt some slight love for it. > > > > This seemed to take some of the sting out of it and it subsided and > > quietness dominated that much quicker. The love felt much better > than > > self loathing and disgust and the positive energy does not "add fuel > > to the fire" of a negative emotion. > > > > Now, I cannot vouch for this being a teaching of Maa, but it came to > > me in a quiet way, as a result of the "stop, look, and listen" > > technique I have been using. So, I followed it and it felt right. > > > > > > Now, I am working on inserting the proper mantra when the improper > > mood arises, repeating the mantra most descriptive of the negative > > emotion, then, using the mantra representing the positive emotion. > The > > goal: to insert the positive emotion in place of the negative one. > > > > This is the technique taught in the 4th Kashyapa Sutra > > > > I will ask Swami about giving a negative thought love. > > > > Jai Maa, Jai Swami > > > > love > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Vish, > > > > > > You might want to check that one with the Guru's first: to offer > love to > > > thoughts which one recognizes to be dark, contracted, and wholly > > > negitive. I don't offer a contrary opinion--just that it would be > good > > > to check. I would love to hear the answer. > > > > > > Respectfully' > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > That is a great goal- to offer love to those thoughts which veer > us > > > > from our goal. When Maa Chandi slays the Great Ego, She sends > him to > > > > Heaven not to a lower world. > > > > > > > > With this new technique from Sutra 4, we should be able to > effectively > > > > witness one unhealthy emotions change into life supporting ones. > > > > > > > > Thanks for reminding me of the Goal > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > love > > > > Vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > , "kaliananda_saraswati" > > > > kaliananda_saraswati@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > Kasyapa Sutra 4 says ........"It is our own attachment which > makes > > > > > for cloudy judgement. It is just our ignorant attachments > which > > > > > make for a lack of discrimination. The ego is very subtle and > will > > > > > try to trick us. But by constant vigilance we can gain > control, > > > > > self-mastery, and a greater degree of efficiency. Then we > will > > > > > attempt to satisfy only those desires which will produce the > fruit > > > > > of knowledge, not the fruit of ignorance." > > > > > > > > > > Join us in offering peace and love to those thoughts and > attitudes > > > > > that veer us from our goal. > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > Today in our discussion group on the live chat, we discussed > an > > > > > > amazing technique for releasing ourselves from the bondage > of > > > > > > behaviors which take us away from our goal of self > realization. > > > > > > On page 39 of the Kasyapa Sutras, we discovered that > specific > > > > > mantras > > > > > > can be used to control emotions and behaviors. There are > mantras > > > > > > which correspond to specific emotions, such as sorrow, lust, > > > > > doubt, etc. > > > > > > By repeating those mantras, you gain control of the specific > > > > > emotion. > > > > > > Then, you can recite the mantra of the attitude you wish to > > > replace > > > > > > the emotion with. For example, peace, dharma, forgiveness, > > > > > abundance, > > > > > > light, pleasure, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, repeat one mala of bham, confusion, then > another mala > > > > > of > > > > > > sam, peace. In this way you can watch confusion transform > into > > > > > peace. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is so simple, so practical, and so profound. Those of us > in > > > the > > > > > > group today all took a sankalpa of watching our emotions, > and when > > > > > a > > > > > > non-life supporting emotion rears its head, we will repeat > the > > > > > mantra > > > > > > of it, then replace it with the positive attitude by > repeating > > > that > > > > > > mantra. > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish I could list all the mantras, but there are too many. > I > > > > > hope > > > > > > you can all obtain a copy of the book: Shree Maa: the Guru > and > > > the > > > > > > Goddess and try this technique. > > > > > > > > > > > > Those of us practicing this technique, will share our > discoveries > > > > > on > > > > > > line. Please join. The more of us practicing together, the > > > > > stronger > > > > > > the influence. > > > > > > > > > > > > I thank Maa and Swami for giving us this gift, another pearl > of > > > > > wisdom > > > > > > to add to string of pearls hanging around our necks. > > > > > > Please make me worthy of this gift, and increase my devotion > and > > > > > bring > > > > > > devotion to our entire Devi Mandir family, and thru our > family, > > > and > > > > > > the families of our families, bring pure devotion and peace > to > > > this > > > > > > entire Uni- Verse. > > > > > > One undivided verse, the refrain of the song of God. The > eternal > > > > > love > > > > > > song which pervades every note sung, and fills every heart > with > > > > > bliss, > > > > > > Jai Maa. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2006 Report Share Posted November 22, 2006 Tanmaya, I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. Jai Maa Sadhu Maa , "ty_maa" <dsjames wrote: > > > Dear All, > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, > etc. > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > interest. > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > archetypes. > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > Chandi. > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > Respectfully, > > Tanmaya > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2006 Report Share Posted November 22, 2006 Dear Sadhumaa, Thank you; I always admire your sober and balanced views. You seem to be taking a sort of middleground between a subjective and objective understanding of obstructive forces which in spiritual practice we are attempting to purify. And that also helps to clarify for me the subject which I really want to ask about: not so much an examination of the troublesome negatives in our sadhana, but as to whether the use of Chandipath is generally understood by members as an objective, or macrocosmic activity, or one dealing with subjective sadhana and purification, ie. as a microsmic exercise. I believe that in the East, the majority of Chandi sadhakas are thinking in terms of objective Gods and asuras. And perhaps in the West, most are relating to the Chandi in terms of more personal or microcosmic psychology, purification, and spiritual advancement. I confess that when I read the posts advocating that one offer love to the negative "thoughts", alarm bells went off throughout my whole body, and a flashing red light spelled our "DANGER!", similar to what I would feel if a hypothetical twelve year old daughter were to announce to me one day that "I have been playing with a ouiji board and I just love the new friend that comes to me then". However, even though we are still awaiting Swamiji's comments, I an able to see that for one who is thinking entirely in terms of the subjective application of Chandipath, such a view is perfectly reasonable, and probably effective as well. Thank you again for your post. Respectfully, Tanmaya , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa wrote: > > Tanmaya, > I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive > thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own > kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when > walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. > Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their > reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, > and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute > to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. > Jai Maa > Sadhu Maa > > , "ty_maa" dsjames@ wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, > > etc. > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > interest. > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > archetypes. > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > > Chandi. > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2006 Report Share Posted November 22, 2006 Tanmaya, One more analogy related to this. Besides what has been already said, I do think that when early in the process of trying to make a change in a long standing thinking or reaction pattern we are more vulnerable to the influence of the thought energy forms around us. One might think of it like when an alcoholic is early in the process of sobriety or when someone is trying to give up overeating sweets....early in the process we are more vulnerable to the enviroment, to what our friends are doing, to what is placed in front of us...it is harder to resist that drink or sweet for inastance. After some time when we have detoxed from the old pattern and gotten our feet under us more so that we are consciously making different choices it might be easier for us to be exposed to things while not getting pulled by them. Moral of the story, when early in the process of changing a habit take some time to the best of our ability to not get exposed to others or media that would reinforce that habit. I think this combined with the japa might help jump start new patterns. Jai Maa , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa wrote: > > Tanmaya, > I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive > thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own > kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when > walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. > Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their > reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, > and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute > to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. > Jai Maa > Sadhu Maa > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, > > etc. > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > interest. > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > archetypes. > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > > Chandi. > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2006 Report Share Posted November 22, 2006 heelo Devi mandir grup pls not send me mail because my folder was full raj Sadhu Maa <sadumaa > wrote: Tanmaya, I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. Jai Maa Sadhu Maa , "ty_maa" <dsjames wrote: > > > Dear All, > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, > etc. > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > interest. > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > archetypes. > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > Chandi. > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > Respectfully, > > Tanmaya > > Sponsored Link Get an Online or Campus degree - Associate's, Bachelor's, or Master's -in less than one year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2006 Report Share Posted November 22, 2006 Tanmaya, This is a difficult topic, mostly, I think, because it falls so far into the realm of theory. I have personally seen few references to archetypal entities or forms by any of the sages, and since I have no personal direct experience of the whole of their reality, there is little I can say with any authority. I see that you are making a distinction between those "thoughts" which are relatively easy to control, and those that are more enduring and more powerful. For me, it is less important where these energies originate, than to recognize that they exist, that they do result from my karmas, and that my best efforts will probably not have much effect on them. One sage I read said essentially that real change only occurs after kundalini ascends, and before that, all of our efforts really amount to little in the way of change. Does this mean it is then useless to struggle against our difficult tendencies? No; absolutely not. If it were, Mother and Swamiji wouldn't spend so much time telling us again and again to live a spiritual life, to change the way we live, to live with discipline and love. My view is that given the circumstances, it is the effort that is most important - not whether our efforts have produced perfect balance and sanctity. Our efforts to be "good" are part of our tapasya, and it is our tapasya, not the individual things we do to try to change our bad habits, that will eventually change us. Jai Maa! Chris , "ty_maa" <dsjames wrote: > > > Dear All, > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, > etc. > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > interest. > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > archetypes. > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > Chandi. > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > Respectfully, > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "henny_v_i" <henny_v_i@> wrote: > > > > Namaste Vish and Tanmaya, > > > > thank you for this interesting discussion and I am also very > > interested in what Swamiji says about the matter. > > Just a thought: what Vish said, about laughing at undesirable thoughts > > or emotions as they present themselves and taking their appearance as > > a game, seems to me to be a valuable way to 'disarm' them. It made me > > think of a story about a brother wearing a bear mask, trying to > > frighten his little sister. This only worked as long as she did not > > recognize her beloved brother. As soon as she saw it was him and > > laughed, he took off the mask and hugged her. As we are told that > > there is nothing but the Guru, surely these thoughts and emotions that > > bother or scare us, are only masks. We can say 'look, you got me going > > there for a while, but now I see it is You, you can show me your real > > face and hug me.' Or we can run home and call our Mom, > > > > with love, > > Henny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > inspectionconnection108@ wrote: > > > > > > Namaste Tanmaya > > > > > > I appreciate your comment about offering love to dark thoughts. I > > sat > > > and thought about it for some time, read some of the Kasyapa Sutras, > > > and analyzed my recent attempts to "stop, look, and listen" when a > > > thought or emotion or mood arises which takes we away from my goal. > > > > > > For example, there is a habit in me to become frustrated and > > > emotionally agitated very quickly when things "do not go right". I > > > loose control and create disharmony around me. Not life supporting. > > > > > > Now, as I have been "consciously watching" this thought arise and > > > begin to take hold of me, over the past several weeks, I realized it > > > was just an old habit, and the ego's attempt to control situations, > > > rather than to accept what happened and flow with it. In plain > > word, > > > trust the universe rather than fight it. > > > > > > In that context, I could view the thought as a hateful thing, to be > > > crushed and killed, or, the ego playing its game in order to keep > > > control and create disharmony. > > > > > > So, I made the attempt to view it, and accept it, as a game, and > > > laughted at it and its folly, and felt some slight love for it. > > > > > > This seemed to take some of the sting out of it and it subsided and > > > quietness dominated that much quicker. The love felt much better > > than > > > self loathing and disgust and the positive energy does not "add fuel > > > to the fire" of a negative emotion. > > > > > > Now, I cannot vouch for this being a teaching of Maa, but it came to > > > me in a quiet way, as a result of the "stop, look, and listen" > > > technique I have been using. So, I followed it and it felt right. > > > > > > > > > Now, I am working on inserting the proper mantra when the improper > > > mood arises, repeating the mantra most descriptive of the negative > > > emotion, then, using the mantra representing the positive emotion. > > The > > > goal: to insert the positive emotion in place of the negative one. > > > > > > This is the technique taught in the 4th Kashyapa Sutra > > > > > > I will ask Swami about giving a negative thought love. > > > > > > Jai Maa, Jai Swami > > > > > > love > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vish, > > > > > > > > You might want to check that one with the Guru's first: to offer > > love to > > > > thoughts which one recognizes to be dark, contracted, and wholly > > > > negitive. I don't offer a contrary opinion--just that it would be > > good > > > > to check. I would love to hear the answer. > > > > > > > > Respectfully' > > > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > That is a great goal- to offer love to those thoughts which veer > > us > > > > > from our goal. When Maa Chandi slays the Great Ego, She sends > > him to > > > > > Heaven not to a lower world. > > > > > > > > > > With this new technique from Sutra 4, we should be able to > > effectively > > > > > witness one unhealthy emotions change into life supporting ones. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reminding me of the Goal > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > Vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "kaliananda_saraswati" > > > > > kaliananda_saraswati@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > Kasyapa Sutra 4 says ........"It is our own attachment which > > makes > > > > > > for cloudy judgement. It is just our ignorant attachments > > which > > > > > > make for a lack of discrimination. The ego is very subtle and > > will > > > > > > try to trick us. But by constant vigilance we can gain > > control, > > > > > > self-mastery, and a greater degree of efficiency. Then we > > will > > > > > > attempt to satisfy only those desires which will produce the > > fruit > > > > > > of knowledge, not the fruit of ignorance." > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us in offering peace and love to those thoughts and > > attitudes > > > > > > that veer us from our goal. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today in our discussion group on the live chat, we discussed > > an > > > > > > > amazing technique for releasing ourselves from the bondage > > of > > > > > > > behaviors which take us away from our goal of self > > realization. > > > > > > > On page 39 of the Kasyapa Sutras, we discovered that > > specific > > > > > > mantras > > > > > > > can be used to control emotions and behaviors. There are > > mantras > > > > > > > which correspond to specific emotions, such as sorrow, lust, > > > > > > doubt, etc. > > > > > > > By repeating those mantras, you gain control of the specific > > > > > > emotion. > > > > > > > Then, you can recite the mantra of the attitude you wish to > > > > replace > > > > > > > the emotion with. For example, peace, dharma, forgiveness, > > > > > > abundance, > > > > > > > light, pleasure, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, repeat one mala of bham, confusion, then > > another mala > > > > > > of > > > > > > > sam, peace. In this way you can watch confusion transform > > into > > > > > > peace. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is so simple, so practical, and so profound. Those of us > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > group today all took a sankalpa of watching our emotions, > > and when > > > > > > a > > > > > > > non-life supporting emotion rears its head, we will repeat > > the > > > > > > mantra > > > > > > > of it, then replace it with the positive attitude by > > repeating > > > > that > > > > > > > mantra. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish I could list all the mantras, but there are too many. > > I > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > you can all obtain a copy of the book: Shree Maa: the Guru > > and > > > > the > > > > > > > Goddess and try this technique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those of us practicing this technique, will share our > > discoveries > > > > > > on > > > > > > > line. Please join. The more of us practicing together, the > > > > > > stronger > > > > > > > the influence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thank Maa and Swami for giving us this gift, another pearl > > of > > > > > > wisdom > > > > > > > to add to string of pearls hanging around our necks. > > > > > > > Please make me worthy of this gift, and increase my devotion > > and > > > > > > bring > > > > > > > devotion to our entire Devi Mandir family, and thru our > > family, > > > > and > > > > > > > the families of our families, bring pure devotion and peace > > to > > > > this > > > > > > > entire Uni- Verse. > > > > > > > One undivided verse, the refrain of the song of God. The > > eternal > > > > > > love > > > > > > > song which pervades every note sung, and fills every heart > > with > > > > > > bliss, > > > > > > > Jai Maa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2006 Report Share Posted November 22, 2006 This is a really good response, Sadhu Maa, very clear and practical. Jai Maa! Chris , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa wrote: > > Tanmaya, > I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive > thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own > kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when > walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. > Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their > reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, > and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute > to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. > Jai Maa > Sadhu Maa > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, > > etc. > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > interest. > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > archetypes. > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > > Chandi. > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2006 Report Share Posted November 22, 2006 Tanmaya, Don't forget, as you consider the differences between subjective and objective "reality", that it is true (affirmed by all the sages) that the entire universe exists within you - subjectively and objectively. Jai Maa! Chris , "ty_maa" <dsjames wrote: > > > Dear Sadhumaa, > > Thank you; I always admire your sober and balanced views. You seem to > be taking a sort of middleground between a subjective and objective > understanding of obstructive forces which in spiritual practice we are > attempting to purify. > > And that also helps to clarify for me the subject which I really want to > ask about: not so much an examination of the troublesome negatives in > our sadhana, but as to whether the use of Chandipath is generally > understood by members as an objective, or macrocosmic activity, or > one dealing with subjective sadhana and purification, ie. as a microsmic > exercise. > > I believe that in the East, the majority of Chandi sadhakas are thinking > in terms of objective Gods and > asuras. And perhaps in the West, most are relating to the Chandi in > terms of more personal or microcosmic psychology, purification, and > spiritual advancement. > > I confess that when I read the posts advocating that one offer love to > the negative "thoughts", alarm bells went off throughout my whole body, > and a flashing red light spelled our "DANGER!", similar to what I would > feel if a hypothetical twelve year old daughter were to announce to me > one day that "I have been playing with a ouiji board and I just love the > new friend that comes to me then". > > However, even though we are still awaiting Swamiji's comments, I an able > to see that for one who is thinking entirely in terms of the subjective > application of Chandipath, such a view is perfectly reasonable, and > probably effective as well. > > Thank you again for your post. > > Respectfully, > > Tanmaya > > > > > > , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa@> wrote: > > > > Tanmaya, > > I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive > > thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own > > kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when > > walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. > > Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their > > reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, > > and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute > > to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. > > Jai Maa > > Sadhu Maa > > > > , "ty_maa" dsjames@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to > take it > > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be > expedient > > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to > another > > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious > identification > > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility > that > > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka > must > > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective > thought-forms, > > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of > human > > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution > of > > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, > jealousy, > > > etc. > > > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and > all > > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable > by > > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not > far > > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by > a > > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > > interest. > > > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective > thought-forms, > > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > > archetypes. > > > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; > for > > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has > worked > > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form > relationship), > > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our > own > > > Chandi. > > > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept > (albeit > > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or > asura > > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 Thank you Chris. You are a noble man. Tanmaya , "Chris Kirner" <chriskirner1956 wrote: > > Tanmaya, > > This is a difficult topic, mostly, I think, because it falls so far > into the realm of theory. I have personally seen few references to > archetypal entities or forms by any of the sages, and since I have no > personal direct experience of the whole of their reality, there is > little I can say with any authority. > > I see that you are making a distinction between those "thoughts" which > are relatively easy to control, and those that are more enduring and > more powerful. For me, it is less important where these energies > originate, than to recognize that they exist, that they do result from > my karmas, and that my best efforts will probably not have much effect > on them. > > One sage I read said essentially that real change only occurs after > kundalini ascends, and before that, all of our efforts really amount > to little in the way of change. Does this mean it is then useless to > struggle against our difficult tendencies? No; absolutely not. If it > were, Mother and Swamiji wouldn't spend so much time telling us again > and again to live a spiritual life, to change the way we live, to live > with discipline and love. > > My view is that given the circumstances, it is the effort that is most > important - not whether our efforts have produced perfect balance and > sanctity. Our efforts to be "good" are part of our tapasya, and it is > our tapasya, not the individual things we do to try to change our bad > habits, that will eventually change us. > > Jai Maa! > Chris > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to take it > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be expedient > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to another > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious identification > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka must > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, jealousy, > > etc. > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but not far > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > interest. > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective thought-forms, > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > archetypes. > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > > Chandi. > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "henny_v_i" <henny_v_i@> wrote: > > > > > > Namaste Vish and Tanmaya, > > > > > > thank you for this interesting discussion and I am also very > > > interested in what Swamiji says about the matter. > > > Just a thought: what Vish said, about laughing at undesirable thoughts > > > or emotions as they present themselves and taking their appearance as > > > a game, seems to me to be a valuable way to 'disarm' them. It made me > > > think of a story about a brother wearing a bear mask, trying to > > > frighten his little sister. This only worked as long as she did not > > > recognize her beloved brother. As soon as she saw it was him and > > > laughed, he took off the mask and hugged her. As we are told that > > > there is nothing but the Guru, surely these thoughts and emotions that > > > bother or scare us, are only masks. We can say 'look, you got me going > > > there for a while, but now I see it is You, you can show me your real > > > face and hug me.' Or we can run home and call our Mom, > > > > > > with love, > > > Henny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > inspectionconnection108@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste Tanmaya > > > > > > > > I appreciate your comment about offering love to dark thoughts. I > > > sat > > > > and thought about it for some time, read some of the Kasyapa Sutras, > > > > and analyzed my recent attempts to "stop, look, and listen" when a > > > > thought or emotion or mood arises which takes we away from my goal. > > > > > > > > For example, there is a habit in me to become frustrated and > > > > emotionally agitated very quickly when things "do not go right". I > > > > loose control and create disharmony around me. Not life supporting. > > > > > > > > Now, as I have been "consciously watching" this thought arise and > > > > begin to take hold of me, over the past several weeks, I realized it > > > > was just an old habit, and the ego's attempt to control situations, > > > > rather than to accept what happened and flow with it. In plain > > > word, > > > > trust the universe rather than fight it. > > > > > > > > In that context, I could view the thought as a hateful thing, to be > > > > crushed and killed, or, the ego playing its game in order to keep > > > > control and create disharmony. > > > > > > > > So, I made the attempt to view it, and accept it, as a game, and > > > > laughted at it and its folly, and felt some slight love for it. > > > > > > > > This seemed to take some of the sting out of it and it subsided and > > > > quietness dominated that much quicker. The love felt much better > > > than > > > > self loathing and disgust and the positive energy does not "add fuel > > > > to the fire" of a negative emotion. > > > > > > > > Now, I cannot vouch for this being a teaching of Maa, but it came to > > > > me in a quiet way, as a result of the "stop, look, and listen" > > > > technique I have been using. So, I followed it and it felt right. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, I am working on inserting the proper mantra when the improper > > > > mood arises, repeating the mantra most descriptive of the negative > > > > emotion, then, using the mantra representing the positive emotion. > > > The > > > > goal: to insert the positive emotion in place of the negative one. > > > > > > > > This is the technique taught in the 4th Kashyapa Sutra > > > > > > > > I will ask Swami about giving a negative thought love. > > > > > > > > Jai Maa, Jai Swami > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vish, > > > > > > > > > > You might want to check that one with the Guru's first: to offer > > > love to > > > > > thoughts which one recognizes to be dark, contracted, and wholly > > > > > negitive. I don't offer a contrary opinion--just that it would be > > > good > > > > > to check. I would love to hear the answer. > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully' > > > > > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > That is a great goal- to offer love to those thoughts which veer > > > us > > > > > > from our goal. When Maa Chandi slays the Great Ego, She sends > > > him to > > > > > > Heaven not to a lower world. > > > > > > > > > > > > With this new technique from Sutra 4, we should be able to > > > effectively > > > > > > witness one unhealthy emotions change into life supporting ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reminding me of the Goal > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > Vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "kaliananda_saraswati" > > > > > > kaliananda_saraswati@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kasyapa Sutra 4 says ........"It is our own attachment which > > > makes > > > > > > > for cloudy judgement. It is just our ignorant attachments > > > which > > > > > > > make for a lack of discrimination. The ego is very subtle and > > > will > > > > > > > try to trick us. But by constant vigilance we can gain > > > control, > > > > > > > self-mastery, and a greater degree of efficiency. Then we > > > will > > > > > > > attempt to satisfy only those desires which will produce the > > > fruit > > > > > > > of knowledge, not the fruit of ignorance." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us in offering peace and love to those thoughts and > > > attitudes > > > > > > > that veer us from our goal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today in our discussion group on the live chat, we discussed > > > an > > > > > > > > amazing technique for releasing ourselves from the bondage > > > of > > > > > > > > behaviors which take us away from our goal of self > > > realization. > > > > > > > > On page 39 of the Kasyapa Sutras, we discovered that > > > specific > > > > > > > mantras > > > > > > > > can be used to control emotions and behaviors. There are > > > mantras > > > > > > > > which correspond to specific emotions, such as sorrow, lust, > > > > > > > doubt, etc. > > > > > > > > By repeating those mantras, you gain control of the specific > > > > > > > emotion. > > > > > > > > Then, you can recite the mantra of the attitude you wish to > > > > > replace > > > > > > > > the emotion with. For example, peace, dharma, forgiveness, > > > > > > > abundance, > > > > > > > > light, pleasure, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, repeat one mala of bham, confusion, then > > > another mala > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > sam, peace. In this way you can watch confusion transform > > > into > > > > > > > peace. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is so simple, so practical, and so profound. Those of us > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > > group today all took a sankalpa of watching our emotions, > > > and when > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > non-life supporting emotion rears its head, we will repeat > > > the > > > > > > > mantra > > > > > > > > of it, then replace it with the positive attitude by > > > repeating > > > > > that > > > > > > > > mantra. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish I could list all the mantras, but there are too many. > > > I > > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > > you can all obtain a copy of the book: Shree Maa: the Guru > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Goddess and try this technique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those of us practicing this technique, will share our > > > discoveries > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > line. Please join. The more of us practicing together, the > > > > > > > stronger > > > > > > > > the influence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thank Maa and Swami for giving us this gift, another pearl > > > of > > > > > > > wisdom > > > > > > > > to add to string of pearls hanging around our necks. > > > > > > > > Please make me worthy of this gift, and increase my devotion > > > and > > > > > > > bring > > > > > > > > devotion to our entire Devi Mandir family, and thru our > > > family, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > the families of our families, bring pure devotion and peace > > > to > > > > > this > > > > > > > > entire Uni- Verse. > > > > > > > > One undivided verse, the refrain of the song of God. The > > > eternal > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > song which pervades every note sung, and fills every heart > > > with > > > > > > > bliss, > > > > > > > > Jai Maa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 Namaste Dear Sadhumaa and Tanmaya, the last post is really clear and helpful As Swami says, after some time the old habits simply have no sway over us. They knock, and no one is home to answer the door. Here is a story to demonstrate the point of the effect of the environment on us. In India, the traditional method of dyeing cloth was dipping it into dye, then putting it out in the sun. The hot sun bleached out all but a little color. then dip into the dye again. Bright color, put it into the sun. Sun fades less out. Repeat the process till the cloth becomes color fast. Nothing can effect it. We want to realize the Self. We start to meditate, perform puja, or mantras to change our emotions. We feel so good in meditation, so deep so quiet. We plunge into activity, and for a short time, we are calm and quiet. Too soon, we are overwhelmed and lose the Self to the negative impulses all around us. Again meditate, bask in the light of pure love and bliss. Out we come, and each time, we are more Self centered. Until some time, we don't loose OurSelf in activity. The negative energy in the world does not necessarily decrease, we simply do not react to it the same way anymore. The Self is color fast. Jai Maa Jai Swami love vishweshwar , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa wrote: > > Tanmaya, > One more analogy related to this. Besides what has been already said, > I do think that when early in the process of trying to make a change > in a long standing thinking or reaction pattern we are more vulnerable > to the influence of the thought energy forms around us. One might > think of it like when an alcoholic is early in the process of sobriety > or when someone is trying to give up overeating sweets....early in the > process we are more vulnerable to the enviroment, to what our friends > are doing, to what is placed in front of us...it is harder to resist > that drink or sweet for inastance. After some time when we have > detoxed from the old pattern and gotten our feet under us more so that > we are consciously making different choices it might be easier for us > to be exposed to things while not getting pulled by them. > > Moral of the story, when early in the process of changing a habit take > some time to the best of our ability to not get exposed to others or > media that would reinforce that habit. I think this combined with the > japa might help jump start new patterns. > Jai Maa > > , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa@> wrote: > > > > Tanmaya, > > I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive > > thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own > > kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when > > walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. > > Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their > > reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, > > and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute > > to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. > > Jai Maa > > Sadhu Maa > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to > take it > > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be > expedient > > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to > another > > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious > identification > > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka > must > > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, > jealousy, > > > etc. > > > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but > not far > > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > > interest. > > > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective > thought-forms, > > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > > archetypes. > > > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > > > Chandi. > > > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 Thank you dear! Jai Maa! Chris , "ty_maa" <dsjames wrote: > > > Thank you Chris. You are a noble man. > > Tanmaya > > > > > , "Chris Kirner" > <chriskirner1956@> wrote: > > > > Tanmaya, > > > > This is a difficult topic, mostly, I think, because it falls so far > > into the realm of theory. I have personally seen few references to > > archetypal entities or forms by any of the sages, and since I have no > > personal direct experience of the whole of their reality, there is > > little I can say with any authority. > > > > I see that you are making a distinction between those "thoughts" which > > are relatively easy to control, and those that are more enduring and > > more powerful. For me, it is less important where these energies > > originate, than to recognize that they exist, that they do result from > > my karmas, and that my best efforts will probably not have much effect > > on them. > > > > One sage I read said essentially that real change only occurs after > > kundalini ascends, and before that, all of our efforts really amount > > to little in the way of change. Does this mean it is then useless to > > struggle against our difficult tendencies? No; absolutely not. If it > > were, Mother and Swamiji wouldn't spend so much time telling us again > > and again to live a spiritual life, to change the way we live, to live > > with discipline and love. > > > > My view is that given the circumstances, it is the effort that is most > > important - not whether our efforts have produced perfect balance and > > sanctity. Our efforts to be "good" are part of our tapasya, and it is > > our tapasya, not the individual things we do to try to change our bad > > habits, that will eventually change us. > > > > Jai Maa! > > Chris > > > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to > take it > > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be > expedient > > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to > another > > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious > identification > > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka > must > > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, > jealousy, > > > etc. > > > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but > not far > > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > > interest. > > > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective > thought-forms, > > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > > archetypes. > > > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > > > Chandi. > > > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "henny_v_i" <henny_v_i@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste Vish and Tanmaya, > > > > > > > > thank you for this interesting discussion and I am also very > > > > interested in what Swamiji says about the matter. > > > > Just a thought: what Vish said, about laughing at undesirable > thoughts > > > > or emotions as they present themselves and taking their > appearance as > > > > a game, seems to me to be a valuable way to 'disarm' them. It > made me > > > > think of a story about a brother wearing a bear mask, trying to > > > > frighten his little sister. This only worked as long as she did not > > > > recognize her beloved brother. As soon as she saw it was him and > > > > laughed, he took off the mask and hugged her. As we are told that > > > > there is nothing but the Guru, surely these thoughts and > emotions that > > > > bother or scare us, are only masks. We can say 'look, you got me > going > > > > there for a while, but now I see it is You, you can show me your > real > > > > face and hug me.' Or we can run home and call our Mom, > > > > > > > > with love, > > > > Henny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > inspectionconnection108@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > I appreciate your comment about offering love to dark thoughts. I > > > > sat > > > > > and thought about it for some time, read some of the Kasyapa > Sutras, > > > > > and analyzed my recent attempts to "stop, look, and listen" when a > > > > > thought or emotion or mood arises which takes we away from my > goal. > > > > > > > > > > For example, there is a habit in me to become frustrated and > > > > > emotionally agitated very quickly when things "do not go > right". I > > > > > loose control and create disharmony around me. Not life > supporting. > > > > > > > > > > Now, as I have been "consciously watching" this thought arise and > > > > > begin to take hold of me, over the past several weeks, I > realized it > > > > > was just an old habit, and the ego's attempt to control > situations, > > > > > rather than to accept what happened and flow with it. In plain > > > > word, > > > > > trust the universe rather than fight it. > > > > > > > > > > In that context, I could view the thought as a hateful thing, > to be > > > > > crushed and killed, or, the ego playing its game in order to keep > > > > > control and create disharmony. > > > > > > > > > > So, I made the attempt to view it, and accept it, as a game, and > > > > > laughted at it and its folly, and felt some slight love for it. > > > > > > > > > > This seemed to take some of the sting out of it and it > subsided and > > > > > quietness dominated that much quicker. The love felt much better > > > > than > > > > > self loathing and disgust and the positive energy does not > "add fuel > > > > > to the fire" of a negative emotion. > > > > > > > > > > Now, I cannot vouch for this being a teaching of Maa, but it > came to > > > > > me in a quiet way, as a result of the "stop, look, and listen" > > > > > technique I have been using. So, I followed it and it felt right. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, I am working on inserting the proper mantra when the improper > > > > > mood arises, repeating the mantra most descriptive of the negative > > > > > emotion, then, using the mantra representing the positive emotion. > > > > The > > > > > goal: to insert the positive emotion in place of the negative one. > > > > > > > > > > This is the technique taught in the 4th Kashyapa Sutra > > > > > > > > > > I will ask Swami about giving a negative thought love. > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa, Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vish, > > > > > > > > > > > > You might want to check that one with the Guru's first: to offer > > > > love to > > > > > > thoughts which one recognizes to be dark, contracted, and wholly > > > > > > negitive. I don't offer a contrary opinion--just that it > would be > > > > good > > > > > > to check. I would love to hear the answer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully' > > > > > > > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is a great goal- to offer love to those thoughts > which veer > > > > us > > > > > > > from our goal. When Maa Chandi slays the Great Ego, She sends > > > > him to > > > > > > > Heaven not to a lower world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this new technique from Sutra 4, we should be able to > > > > effectively > > > > > > > witness one unhealthy emotions change into life supporting > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reminding me of the Goal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > Vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "kaliananda_saraswati" > > > > > > > kaliananda_saraswati@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kasyapa Sutra 4 says ........"It is our own attachment which > > > > makes > > > > > > > > for cloudy judgement. It is just our ignorant attachments > > > > which > > > > > > > > make for a lack of discrimination. The ego is very > subtle and > > > > will > > > > > > > > try to trick us. But by constant vigilance we can gain > > > > control, > > > > > > > > self-mastery, and a greater degree of efficiency. Then we > > > > will > > > > > > > > attempt to satisfy only those desires which will produce the > > > > fruit > > > > > > > > of knowledge, not the fruit of ignorance." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us in offering peace and love to those thoughts and > > > > attitudes > > > > > > > > that veer us from our goal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today in our discussion group on the live chat, we > discussed > > > > an > > > > > > > > > amazing technique for releasing ourselves from the bondage > > > > of > > > > > > > > > behaviors which take us away from our goal of self > > > > realization. > > > > > > > > > On page 39 of the Kasyapa Sutras, we discovered that > > > > specific > > > > > > > > mantras > > > > > > > > > can be used to control emotions and behaviors. There are > > > > mantras > > > > > > > > > which correspond to specific emotions, such as sorrow, > lust, > > > > > > > > doubt, etc. > > > > > > > > > By repeating those mantras, you gain control of the > specific > > > > > > > > emotion. > > > > > > > > > Then, you can recite the mantra of the attitude you > wish to > > > > > > replace > > > > > > > > > the emotion with. For example, peace, dharma, forgiveness, > > > > > > > > abundance, > > > > > > > > > light, pleasure, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, repeat one mala of bham, confusion, then > > > > another mala > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > sam, peace. In this way you can watch confusion transform > > > > into > > > > > > > > peace. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is so simple, so practical, and so profound. Those > of us > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > group today all took a sankalpa of watching our emotions, > > > > and when > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > non-life supporting emotion rears its head, we will repeat > > > > the > > > > > > > > mantra > > > > > > > > > of it, then replace it with the positive attitude by > > > > repeating > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > mantra. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish I could list all the mantras, but there are too > many. > > > > I > > > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > > > you can all obtain a copy of the book: Shree Maa: the > Guru > > > > and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Goddess and try this technique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those of us practicing this technique, will share our > > > > discoveries > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > line. Please join. The more of us practicing > together, the > > > > > > > > stronger > > > > > > > > > the influence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thank Maa and Swami for giving us this gift, another > pearl > > > > of > > > > > > > > wisdom > > > > > > > > > to add to string of pearls hanging around our necks. > > > > > > > > > Please make me worthy of this gift, and increase my > devotion > > > > and > > > > > > > > bring > > > > > > > > > devotion to our entire Devi Mandir family, and thru our > > > > family, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > the families of our families, bring pure devotion and > peace > > > > to > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > entire Uni- Verse. > > > > > > > > > One undivided verse, the refrain of the song of God. The > > > > eternal > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > song which pervades every note sung, and fills every heart > > > > with > > > > > > > > bliss, > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 Thank you Tanmaya! You honor me too much........no, REALLY! (thank you) Jai Maa! Chris , "ty_maa" <dsjames wrote: > > > Thank you Chris. You are a noble man. > > Tanmaya > > > > > , "Chris Kirner" > <chriskirner1956@> wrote: > > > > Tanmaya, > > > > This is a difficult topic, mostly, I think, because it falls so far > > into the realm of theory. I have personally seen few references to > > archetypal entities or forms by any of the sages, and since I have no > > personal direct experience of the whole of their reality, there is > > little I can say with any authority. > > > > I see that you are making a distinction between those "thoughts" which > > are relatively easy to control, and those that are more enduring and > > more powerful. For me, it is less important where these energies > > originate, than to recognize that they exist, that they do result from > > my karmas, and that my best efforts will probably not have much effect > > on them. > > > > One sage I read said essentially that real change only occurs after > > kundalini ascends, and before that, all of our efforts really amount > > to little in the way of change. Does this mean it is then useless to > > struggle against our difficult tendencies? No; absolutely not. If it > > were, Mother and Swamiji wouldn't spend so much time telling us again > > and again to live a spiritual life, to change the way we live, to live > > with discipline and love. > > > > My view is that given the circumstances, it is the effort that is most > > important - not whether our efforts have produced perfect balance and > > sanctity. Our efforts to be "good" are part of our tapasya, and it is > > our tapasya, not the individual things we do to try to change our bad > > habits, that will eventually change us. > > > > Jai Maa! > > Chris > > > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to > take it > > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be > expedient > > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to > another > > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious > identification > > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility that > > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka > must > > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective thought-forms, > > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of human > > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire evolution of > > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, > jealousy, > > > etc. > > > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, and all > > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be redeemable by > > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but > not far > > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) driven by a > > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > > interest. > > > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective > thought-forms, > > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > > archetypes. > > > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern world; for > > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has worked > > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form relationship), > > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in our own > > > Chandi. > > > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept (albeit > > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or asura > > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "henny_v_i" <henny_v_i@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste Vish and Tanmaya, > > > > > > > > thank you for this interesting discussion and I am also very > > > > interested in what Swamiji says about the matter. > > > > Just a thought: what Vish said, about laughing at undesirable > thoughts > > > > or emotions as they present themselves and taking their > appearance as > > > > a game, seems to me to be a valuable way to 'disarm' them. It > made me > > > > think of a story about a brother wearing a bear mask, trying to > > > > frighten his little sister. This only worked as long as she did not > > > > recognize her beloved brother. As soon as she saw it was him and > > > > laughed, he took off the mask and hugged her. As we are told that > > > > there is nothing but the Guru, surely these thoughts and > emotions that > > > > bother or scare us, are only masks. We can say 'look, you got me > going > > > > there for a while, but now I see it is You, you can show me your > real > > > > face and hug me.' Or we can run home and call our Mom, > > > > > > > > with love, > > > > Henny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > inspectionconnection108@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > I appreciate your comment about offering love to dark thoughts. I > > > > sat > > > > > and thought about it for some time, read some of the Kasyapa > Sutras, > > > > > and analyzed my recent attempts to "stop, look, and listen" when a > > > > > thought or emotion or mood arises which takes we away from my > goal. > > > > > > > > > > For example, there is a habit in me to become frustrated and > > > > > emotionally agitated very quickly when things "do not go > right". I > > > > > loose control and create disharmony around me. Not life > supporting. > > > > > > > > > > Now, as I have been "consciously watching" this thought arise and > > > > > begin to take hold of me, over the past several weeks, I > realized it > > > > > was just an old habit, and the ego's attempt to control > situations, > > > > > rather than to accept what happened and flow with it. In plain > > > > word, > > > > > trust the universe rather than fight it. > > > > > > > > > > In that context, I could view the thought as a hateful thing, > to be > > > > > crushed and killed, or, the ego playing its game in order to keep > > > > > control and create disharmony. > > > > > > > > > > So, I made the attempt to view it, and accept it, as a game, and > > > > > laughted at it and its folly, and felt some slight love for it. > > > > > > > > > > This seemed to take some of the sting out of it and it > subsided and > > > > > quietness dominated that much quicker. The love felt much better > > > > than > > > > > self loathing and disgust and the positive energy does not > "add fuel > > > > > to the fire" of a negative emotion. > > > > > > > > > > Now, I cannot vouch for this being a teaching of Maa, but it > came to > > > > > me in a quiet way, as a result of the "stop, look, and listen" > > > > > technique I have been using. So, I followed it and it felt right. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, I am working on inserting the proper mantra when the improper > > > > > mood arises, repeating the mantra most descriptive of the negative > > > > > emotion, then, using the mantra representing the positive emotion. > > > > The > > > > > goal: to insert the positive emotion in place of the negative one. > > > > > > > > > > This is the technique taught in the 4th Kashyapa Sutra > > > > > > > > > > I will ask Swami about giving a negative thought love. > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa, Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vish, > > > > > > > > > > > > You might want to check that one with the Guru's first: to offer > > > > love to > > > > > > thoughts which one recognizes to be dark, contracted, and wholly > > > > > > negitive. I don't offer a contrary opinion--just that it > would be > > > > good > > > > > > to check. I would love to hear the answer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully' > > > > > > > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is a great goal- to offer love to those thoughts > which veer > > > > us > > > > > > > from our goal. When Maa Chandi slays the Great Ego, She sends > > > > him to > > > > > > > Heaven not to a lower world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this new technique from Sutra 4, we should be able to > > > > effectively > > > > > > > witness one unhealthy emotions change into life supporting > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reminding me of the Goal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > Vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "kaliananda_saraswati" > > > > > > > kaliananda_saraswati@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kasyapa Sutra 4 says ........"It is our own attachment which > > > > makes > > > > > > > > for cloudy judgement. It is just our ignorant attachments > > > > which > > > > > > > > make for a lack of discrimination. The ego is very > subtle and > > > > will > > > > > > > > try to trick us. But by constant vigilance we can gain > > > > control, > > > > > > > > self-mastery, and a greater degree of efficiency. Then we > > > > will > > > > > > > > attempt to satisfy only those desires which will produce the > > > > fruit > > > > > > > > of knowledge, not the fruit of ignorance." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Join us in offering peace and love to those thoughts and > > > > attitudes > > > > > > > > that veer us from our goal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > "inspectionconnection108" > > > > > > > > <inspectionconnection108@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today in our discussion group on the live chat, we > discussed > > > > an > > > > > > > > > amazing technique for releasing ourselves from the bondage > > > > of > > > > > > > > > behaviors which take us away from our goal of self > > > > realization. > > > > > > > > > On page 39 of the Kasyapa Sutras, we discovered that > > > > specific > > > > > > > > mantras > > > > > > > > > can be used to control emotions and behaviors. There are > > > > mantras > > > > > > > > > which correspond to specific emotions, such as sorrow, > lust, > > > > > > > > doubt, etc. > > > > > > > > > By repeating those mantras, you gain control of the > specific > > > > > > > > emotion. > > > > > > > > > Then, you can recite the mantra of the attitude you > wish to > > > > > > replace > > > > > > > > > the emotion with. For example, peace, dharma, forgiveness, > > > > > > > > abundance, > > > > > > > > > light, pleasure, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, repeat one mala of bham, confusion, then > > > > another mala > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > sam, peace. In this way you can watch confusion transform > > > > into > > > > > > > > peace. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is so simple, so practical, and so profound. Those > of us > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > group today all took a sankalpa of watching our emotions, > > > > and when > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > non-life supporting emotion rears its head, we will repeat > > > > the > > > > > > > > mantra > > > > > > > > > of it, then replace it with the positive attitude by > > > > repeating > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > mantra. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish I could list all the mantras, but there are too > many. > > > > I > > > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > > > you can all obtain a copy of the book: Shree Maa: the > Guru > > > > and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Goddess and try this technique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those of us practicing this technique, will share our > > > > discoveries > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > line. Please join. The more of us practicing > together, the > > > > > > > > stronger > > > > > > > > > the influence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thank Maa and Swami for giving us this gift, another > pearl > > > > of > > > > > > > > wisdom > > > > > > > > > to add to string of pearls hanging around our necks. > > > > > > > > > Please make me worthy of this gift, and increase my > devotion > > > > and > > > > > > > > bring > > > > > > > > > devotion to our entire Devi Mandir family, and thru our > > > > family, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > the families of our families, bring pure devotion and > peace > > > > to > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > entire Uni- Verse. > > > > > > > > > One undivided verse, the refrain of the song of God. The > > > > eternal > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > song which pervades every note sung, and fills every heart > > > > with > > > > > > > > bliss, > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vishweshwar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 May we all become colorfast and of the highest quality. Jai Maa! Chris , "inspectionconnection108" <inspectionconnection108 wrote: > > Namaste > > Dear Sadhumaa and Tanmaya, the last post is really clear and helpful > As Swami says, after some time the old habits simply have no sway over > us. They knock, and no one is home to answer the door. > > Here is a story to demonstrate the point of the effect of the > environment on us. > In India, the traditional method of dyeing cloth was dipping it into > dye, then putting it out in the sun. The hot sun bleached out all but > a little color. then dip into the dye again. Bright color, put it > into the sun. Sun fades less out. Repeat the process till the cloth > becomes color fast. Nothing can effect it. > We want to realize the Self. We start to meditate, perform puja, or > mantras to change our emotions. We feel so good in meditation, so deep > so quiet. We plunge into activity, and for a short time, we are calm > and quiet. Too soon, we are overwhelmed and lose the Self to the > negative impulses all around us. Again meditate, bask in the light of > pure love and bliss. Out we come, and each time, we are more Self > centered. Until some time, we don't loose OurSelf in activity. > The negative energy in the world does not necessarily decrease, we > simply do not react to it the same way anymore. The Self is color fast. > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > love > > vishweshwar > > > > , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa@> wrote: > > > > Tanmaya, > > One more analogy related to this. Besides what has been already said, > > I do think that when early in the process of trying to make a change > > in a long standing thinking or reaction pattern we are more vulnerable > > to the influence of the thought energy forms around us. One might > > think of it like when an alcoholic is early in the process of sobriety > > or when someone is trying to give up overeating sweets....early in the > > process we are more vulnerable to the enviroment, to what our friends > > are doing, to what is placed in front of us...it is harder to resist > > that drink or sweet for inastance. After some time when we have > > detoxed from the old pattern and gotten our feet under us more so that > > we are consciously making different choices it might be easier for us > > to be exposed to things while not getting pulled by them. > > > > Moral of the story, when early in the process of changing a habit take > > some time to the best of our ability to not get exposed to others or > > media that would reinforce that habit. I think this combined with the > > japa might help jump start new patterns. > > Jai Maa > > > > , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa@> wrote: > > > > > > Tanmaya, > > > I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive > > > thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own > > > kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when > > > walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. > > > Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their > > > reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, > > > and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute > > > to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. > > > Jai Maa > > > Sadhu Maa > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to > > take it > > > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be > > expedient > > > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to > > another > > > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious > > identification > > > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility > that > > > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka > > must > > > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective > thought-forms, > > > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of > human > > > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire > evolution of > > > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, > > jealousy, > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, > and all > > > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be > redeemable by > > > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but > > not far > > > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) > driven by a > > > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > > > interest. > > > > > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective > > thought-forms, > > > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > > > archetypes. > > > > > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern > world; for > > > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has > worked > > > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form > relationship), > > > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in > our own > > > > Chandi. > > > > > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept > (albeit > > > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or > asura > > > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Everyone, Wonderful analogy Vishweshwar and Tanmaya, it's so helpful to hear everyones thoughts. Get frustrated when changes don't come fast enough. Or slip back into old pattern. These analogies are a great help in dealing with the changes. The Mantra work has been so helpful. Took me a while to remember & use them but once started cld see how they worked. Thanks for having this classes and discussions. One of may goals was simply to check emails each day & that lead into studies, mantra and learning so much more than just working alone. Thanks. Family watched a DVD tonight together after dinner. We've had it a while & this is our 4th time watching it. It talks about changes that happen phy. when we deside to redo our way of thinking and doing things. Lots of good info in it. "What the Bleep!? Down the Rabbit Hole." www.whatthebleep.com. This group is so good for support when going through these changes. Thanks Debi Chris Kirner <chriskirner1956 > wrote: May we all become colorfast and of the highest quality. Jai Maa! Chris , "inspectionconnection108" <inspectionconnection108 wrote: > > Namaste > > Dear Sadhumaa and Tanmaya, the last post is really clear and helpful > As Swami says, after some time the old habits simply have no sway over > us. They knock, and no one is home to answer the door. > > Here is a story to demonstrate the point of the effect of the > environment on us. > In India, the traditional method of dyeing cloth was dipping it into > dye, then putting it out in the sun. The hot sun bleached out all but > a little color. then dip into the dye again. Bright color, put it > into the sun. Sun fades less out. Repeat the process till the cloth > becomes color fast. Nothing can effect it. > We want to realize the Self. We start to meditate, perform puja, or > mantras to change our emotions. We feel so good in meditation, so deep > so quiet. We plunge into activity, and for a short time, we are calm > and quiet. Too soon, we are overwhelmed and lose the Self to the > negative impulses all around us. Again meditate, bask in the light of > pure love and bliss. Out we come, and each time, we are more Self > centered. Until some time, we don't loose OurSelf in activity. > The negative energy in the world does not necessarily decrease, we > simply do not react to it the same way anymore. The Self is color fast. > > Jai Maa Jai Swami > > love > > vishweshwar > > > > , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa@> wrote: > > > > Tanmaya, > > One more analogy related to this. Besides what has been already said, > > I do think that when early in the process of trying to make a change > > in a long standing thinking or reaction pattern we are more vulnerable > > to the influence of the thought energy forms around us. One might > > think of it like when an alcoholic is early in the process of sobriety > > or when someone is trying to give up overeating sweets....early in the > > process we are more vulnerable to the enviroment, to what our friends > > are doing, to what is placed in front of us...it is harder to resist > > that drink or sweet for inastance. After some time when we have > > detoxed from the old pattern and gotten our feet under us more so that > > we are consciously making different choices it might be easier for us > > to be exposed to things while not getting pulled by them. > > > > Moral of the story, when early in the process of changing a habit take > > some time to the best of our ability to not get exposed to others or > > media that would reinforce that habit. I think this combined with the > > japa might help jump start new patterns. > > Jai Maa > > > > , "Sadhu Maa" <sadumaa@> wrote: > > > > > > Tanmaya, > > > I think the relationship is that our small agressive or depressive > > > thoughts feed it. It is a collective energy force that has it's own > > > kind of synergy and influence. We might feel this for instance when > > > walking into a house where there has been a lot of grief or violence. > > > Many cultures have methods for cleansing such thought forms but their > > > reality, while unseen by most, can be felt by many....effecting moods, > > > and patience, and such. We get pulled by them but also can contribute > > > to them by indulging in our own little outbursts or ruminations. > > > Jai Maa > > > Sadhu Maa > > > > > > , "ty_maa" <dsjames@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > This might evolve into a fruitful discussion and I am willing to > > take it > > > > as far as you (collectively) wish. > > > > > > > > It is a "hot" subject for several reasons, and so it would be > > expedient > > > > to take it in small clearly defined steps, and not attribute to > > another > > > > a view, or even, a whole belief system, which that person has not > > > > clearly owned. To do so would be to fall into unconscious > > identification > > > > with very old collective thought patterns, and their very old > > > > relationships and dynamics. Most of which are highly unfruitful. > > > > > > > > That said, I would like to add to the discussion the possibility > that > > > > there may be a significant difference between the quite impotent and > > > > fleeting "thoughts" which continuously cloud one's consciousness as > > > > compulsive "stream-of-consciousness", and with which every sadhaka > > must > > > > contend, and the alleged existence of great collective > thought-forms, > > > > which would be samashties, or collectives, of enormous chunks of > human > > > > emotional, or vital energy (accumulated during the entire > evolution of > > > > human experience) of, for instance, fear, pain, killing rage, > > jealousy, > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > In the case of the latter, they would not be like human beings, > > > > possessing a soul, many layers of very mixed life experience, > and all > > > > that the psychologists east and west study, and hence be > redeemable by > > > > compassion love, a second chance, and proper training. Rather, they > > > > would be mere slivers of consciousness associated with powerful > > > > energetic "bodies" , living in some "space" invisible to us, but > > not far > > > > away, and (very much like a virus-computer or biological-) > driven by a > > > > simple program; not someone you could talk to beyond its subject of > > > > interest. > > > > > > > > In any case, that's more or less the theory of collective > > thought-forms, > > > > sometimes refered to as demons, sometimes as asuras, sometimes as > > > > archetypes. > > > > > > > > Perhaps not everyone believes in the existence of such entities, and > > > > religious life certainly doesn't depend on such belief. Still, the > > > > concept keeps turning up here and there, even in the modern > world; for > > > > instance, in Tolkens great trilogy (which though fictional, has > worked > > > > the subject from every angle of the human/thought-form > relationship), > > > > possibly they are an explaination of, for instance, Hitler's Germany > > > > and, in any case, they certainly dominate the action scenes in > our own > > > > Chandi. > > > > > > > > One question which arises in the case of one who might accept > (albeit > > > > tentatively) the objective reality of such thought-forms or asuras: > > > > > > > > What would be the real relationship between my small bit of brief > > > > individual aggresive reactivity, and the corresponding demon or > asura > > > > depicted in, for instance, the Chandi? > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > Tanmaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out the all-new Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.