Astrodatabank birthdata Problems - what can we trust??

[Guest guest]

Alan

I don't think there is anything wrong with the data. Pat

(Astrodatabank) just clarified my question. I think they are

professionals and take this business seriously. There are time they

have changed A rating to DD rating (Hillary Clinton for example).

But never (as far as I know) changed AA rating data. Also for every

data -they give the time clearly, with the time zone and GMT

difference.

 

I was merely clarifying/amking sure about the time with Pat.

Manjunath Sharma

 

, McCrindle Alan <alan wrote:

>

> If I understand the email that Manjunath Sharma forwarded from

Pat

> Taglilatelo at astrodatabank (see below), it suggests that they

issue

> AA birth times that are not corrected for local law anomalies,

such

> as the law regarding pre 1959 birth times in Chicago.

>

> If this is correct, this could mean that the astrology community

has

> unwittingly been using incorrect birth times from astrodatabank

in

> some cases. How many other such laws existed in other states and

> counties and at what times?

>

> This is potentially a serious problem for the credibility of

> astrodatabank and astrology and it needs to be clarified by

> astrodatabank.

>

> Alan

>

>

> Alan McCrindle

> The Yoga Place

> Level 1, 374 Darling Street

> Balmain, NSW, 2041

> Tel: 9555-7544

> Mobile: 0417-655-601

> http://www.yogaplace.com.au

>

>

> On 11/11/2006, at 7:40 AM, M Sharma wrote:

>

> > Margaret

> > Rumsfeld data as clarified by Astrodatabank lady -Pat

> > FYI

> >

> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------

> > Pat <pat

> > Sep 13, 2006 11:45 AM

> > RE: Rumsfled data question

> > M Sharma <nakshatras

> >

> > His birth certificate gives his time as 5:40 PM and we presume

that

> > it is

> > CST (Central Standard Time), even though daylight was in effect

at the

> > time. Chicago law required birth times to be entered in

standard

> > time up

> > until 1959, regardless of whether daylight time was observed. I

> > called the

> > records office in August 2005 to verify.

> >

> > CST is six hours before GMT, so at 5:40 PM CST, the GMT

equivalent

> > would be 11:40

> > PM.

> >

> > From Pat Taglilatelo

> >

> > AstroDatabank Editor

> >

> > Pat <%20Pat

> >

> > Visit our website: http://www.astrodatabank.com

> >

> >

> > ** M Sharma [nakshatras]

> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:04 AM

> > *To:* Pat

> > *Subject:* Rumsfled data question

> >

> > *Dear Pat*

> >

> > *I have the data of Rumsfeld as*

> >

> > *Donald **Rumsfeld** *9 July 1932 5.40pm Chicago , Illinois

> >

> > Could please tell me if there was day light savings or not (what

is

> > the

> > correct GMT difference).

> >

> > I am in the process of getting that book (time changes in USA).

> >

> > Also kindly confirm or deny the data and the rating on the data.

> >

> > Thank You

> > --

> > Sincerely,

> > Manjunath Sharma

> >

> > --

> > Sincerely,

> > Manjunath Sharma

> >

> >