rhetorical question! no programs 11/11 just 4group good

[Guest guest]

Dear RR, Ashutosh,

 

I am not using OE, IM or any other program but inbox of mail only

and here also ATTACHMENTS are stripped off the stripping is done by the group itself from comming up

 

MY INTENTION here was for the not so Net savy people and as said I can manage it as I have listed, PLEASE RECALL some have said this and recently NALINI-ji having also said these happen and don't worry.

 

ALSO I HAVE shared virus, worm alerts even before MODERATION CAME AROUND SO HAS ASHUTOSH too THAT was the reason I felt we can do someting as we are still shaping some good healthy systems and this will be just another step.

 

on personal level I can deal with it its group interest, where tempers can be damaged if inadvertant worms, viruss come from known names.

 

YOU CAN ALSO SEE ANOTEHR TREND ASHUTOSH AND ME HAVE SHARED prior to moderation, the mulitiple groups posting or repetative postings I have protested more often as we need people to understand that they have to wait the time given by any astrologer, if it has not worked sure they an ask saying they have asked and got an answer earlier and it has not worked.

 

Not throw some stones at a tree and expect to reap as many fruits as possible as it is free. no member must take such service for a ride

 

I have named several ones, Anil Kumar reddy, Kiran frm UK, Manju, Vijeswari, swathi mehata [then now is not active], in Mar-jul] now u have praveen and a few more.

 

so this common thinking is also a main reason to hope good order can be done this way.

 

if our mail program can delete our entity if we dont log in for sometime we why cant we follow the same trend.

MSN, REDIFF give 30 days del ourmails and 60 days ID is gone.

is 90, mail box clear, 120 ID gone,

 

we must have ROTRARY CLUB model than a Lions club model, all here must count to be here as active members.

 

regards/prashant

 

 

Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: I have a feeling that Kumar ji is using an email program to receive

the postings. When that mode is utilized, the attachments go through.

If web-mode is utilized, attachments get stripped off.

 

It is safer to use web-mode. Also in webmode one can pick and choose

messages. Using email program like outlook, everything gets dumped

into the in box and this can lead to frustration because one cannot

avoid ploughing through the messages! Another advantage of webmode

access!

 

RR

 

, "astrologerashutosh"

<astrologerashutosh wrote:

>

> Dear all,

>

> The viruses which are sending messages to Prashant's

email or messenger can in no way be connected to

group's server on .

>

> A virus in infecting the email cannot send message to the

messenger of other person unless and until it has infected the

computer of the message sender.

>

> There are no virus mails coming to the group as such from

any of the idle group members. There is no reason to block their ids.

The messages are being sent only to Prashant's id, no one else's.

>

> There is a provision of spam checking even on the JR group

site. The spam checker works well enough, to the extent that the

mails which Prashant sent to the group mentioning the virus

activities, and citing some examples, landed up in spam folder rather

than in group's messages.

>

> It was because the spam checker identified the given

examples themselves as potential spam.

>

> So, there is no need to block any ids on the group. The

viruses are not working from the server. They are lurking

somewhere in the PCs and they are sending messages to some

individuals only. The best way is to use a better antivirus and to

increase the levels of spam filtering on your emails.

>

> Regards,

>

> Moderator, JR group

>

>

>

> -

> Rohiniranjan

>

> Friday, 10 November, 2006 05:35

> Re: <rhetorical question!>

>

>

> Do you realize how much work you are making for the moderator and

the

> owner, Ashutosh and Tanveer?

>

> They are both volunteering personal and valuable time. FOLKS, let

us

> not give them more grief but our support!

>

> And why? Because this forum is essential for all of us! If they

were

> to close the forum -- where would we all go and get the same

> information that is shared here?

>

> RR

>

> , "R Satish"

<rsatish1942@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Moderator,

> >

> > Considering the number of members participating

> > actively in the group,I agree with the suggestion to quarantine

the

> > dormant/inactive Ids. This would help to limit the virus

> possibility.

> >

> > This can be best done thru a general notification

> > issued once a week for nwxt 4 weeks.This would be socalled

notice

> > period.you will certainly receive objections/suggestions.

> >

> > After taking stock of the situation,implement what

> is

> > best.This would be a rational,democratic process.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Satish

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , "Manjunath, T \(GE

> > Healthcare\)" <T.Manjunath@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Prashant ji, your intent is genuine & sincere.

> > > my mail was a feedback for your original suggestion.

> > > rgds

> > > Manju

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > >

> > > [] On Behalf Of

Prashant

> > Kumar G

> > > B

> > > Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:56 PM

> > >

> > > RE: block my id from the group 9/11- a reqest-

2sure

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > manju

> > > thanks for such a feed back this was the idea of a `2 week

> window'

> > by

> > > which time such ID's like urs can respond and will be in, I

was

> > only

> > > suggesting this as a way out to rid dormant ID's that spring

> > viruses,

> > > worms, the crooks who write it have abused them. as most of

them

> > > happened to be v senior members here. when they are busy or

not

> in

> > has

> > > be a launch pad and they will never know as they dont log.

> > >

> > > prashant

> > >

> > > "Manjunath, T (GE Healthcare)" <T.Manjunath@

> > > <T.Manjunath%40geind.GE.com> > wrote: Dear Prashant

ji..

> > > i cannot login to from the workplace but can recieve

email

> > from

> > > the group.

> > > please consider this scenario as well before any action can

be

> > taken

> > > rgds

> > > manju

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > >

> > > <%40>

> > > [

> > > <%40> ] On Behalf Of

> Prashant

> > > Kumar G

> > > B

> > > Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:13 PM

> > >

> > > <%40>

> > > Re: block my id from the group 9/11- a reqest

> > >

> > > Deaar Ashutosh,

> > >

> > > Good to know this is possible. I was checking with a few on

such

> > moves

> > > if possible to check on dormant ID's, non JR loggers anymore

etc.

> > > just as if we don't log into mail for 90 days our INBOX

is

> > cleared

> > > and after 120 days or os our ID is frozen.

> > >

> > > CAN WE NOT TAKE STEPS TO WEED OUT SUCH members who have not

> logged

> > for a

> > > yr, a group mail can be sent to them once and a time frame of

2

> > weeks

> > > given to respond and delete their entry, if they want let

them

> > come back

> > > afresh.

> > >

> > > THIS WILL CLEAR THE VIRUS/WORM, launced from absentee members

> > ID's, also

> > > give us the true strenght, the strenght that counts. after

all we

> > are

> > > not a NBFC to say we have so many depositers and brign many

more

> > in,

> > > serious numbers are good enough for us we grow in mutual

company.

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > > Prashant

> > >

> > > astrologerashutosh <astrologerashutosh@

> > > <astrologerashutosh%40.fr>

> > > <astrologerashutosh%40.fr> > wrote: Your mail

delivery

> > > option now has been changed to "No Mail". You will not

receive

> any

> > mails

> > > in your inbox now though you are still a member of JR. You

can

> > change

> > > the delivery option to normal whenever you feel like, in

future.

> > >

> > > Moderator, JR group

> > >

> > > -

> > > chandrakanth ganacharya

> > >

> > > <%40>

> > > <%40>

> > > Wednesday, 08 November, 2006 20:00

> > > block my id from the group

> > >

> > > Please block my id from ur group.

> > > I'll join later on.

> > > ThanQ

> > >

> > >

> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail.

> > >

> > >