Guest guest Posted November 16, 2006 Report Share Posted November 16, 2006 Dear all, I find my own chart to be interesting in one aspect that is why I am presenting it before you - if anyone can explain the reason. Of course I have my own way of explaining this but I am really interested to see what learned astrologers have to say about this - if anyone can explain this using the conventional concepts we mostly use to interpret charts. Or should we say, we should revise the way we look at charts? My data 24 Dec 1982, 12.34 AM (00.34 Hrs), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Means 90E25, 23N43, GMT+6. No DLS / DST. My first relationship was in Me-Mo-Ra and second one in Me-Ju-Ra. The antardasha lords are quite reasonable, Moon in 7th house and Jupiter is the 7th lord itself. But what is to note here, that both in the cases the pratyantar lord is Rahu. How come it be, esp. both the times? Also, each and every period of Rahu (pratyantar, or even antar) are the best times for my relationship matters, sometimes even better than Jupiter, the 7th lord itself! Rahu pratyantars even SOLVED the problems I had been having sometimes! How come, Rahu is such positive about this? What is the relation of Rahu with this and why even it is positive? I would be indeed very interested to know what members have to say, if anyone cares or feels interested. Anyone can email me personally also, to tanweera (AT) zipbd (DOT) com. I have a second part of the query, but asking that now will somewhat help people explain it ! :-) Thanks, Tanvir NB. This message is posted in total three forums, all separately. To reach a larger number of people. No spamming or violation meant. Sorry about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2006 Report Share Posted November 16, 2006 Tanvir, For the benefit of those who use different ayanamshas etc, could you rather give the dates as opposed to the planetary period. Many do not even use vimshottari dasha, so again, calendar dates would be more meaningful :-) I will not repost the same request at J_R, but hopefully you will post the date there too, should you decide to accept my request to provide date. Thanks RR vedic astrology, "Tanvir Chowdhury" <king_tanvir wrote: > > Dear all, > > I find my own chart to be interesting in one aspect that is why I am > presenting it before you - if anyone can explain the reason. Of > course I have my own way of explaining this but I am really > interested to see what learned astrologers have to say about this - > if anyone can explain this using the conventional concepts we mostly > use to interpret charts. Or should we say, we should revise the way > we look at charts? > > My data > 24 Dec 1982, 12.34 AM (00.34 Hrs), Dhaka, Bangladesh. > Means 90E25, 23N43, GMT+6. No DLS / DST. > > My first relationship was in Me-Mo-Ra and second one in Me-Ju-Ra. The > antardasha lords are quite reasonable, Moon in 7th house and Jupiter > is the 7th lord itself. But what is to note here, that both in the > cases the pratyantar lord is Rahu. How come it be, esp. both the > times? Also, each and every period of Rahu (pratyantar, or even > antar) are the best times for my relationship matters, sometimes even > better than Jupiter, the 7th lord itself! Rahu pratyantars even > SOLVED the problems I had been having sometimes! How come, Rahu is > such positive about this? What is the relation of Rahu with this and > why even it is positive? > > I would be indeed very interested to know what members have to say, > if anyone cares or feels interested. Anyone can email me personally > also, to tanweera > > I have a second part of the query, but asking that now will somewhat > help people explain it ! :-) > > Thanks, > Tanvir > > NB. This message is posted in total three forums, all separately. To > reach a larger number of people. No spamming or violation meant. > Sorry about it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Dear Tanvir Pls give the dates.Relationship start/trouble/end etc.This may help other learned members of this group to verify using their technoques. Pradeep Pradeep, "Tanvir Chowdhury" <king_tanvir wrote: > > Dear all, > > I find my own chart to be interesting in one aspect that is why I am > presenting it before you - if anyone can explain the reason. Of > course I have my own way of explaining this but I am really > interested to see what learned astrologers have to say about this - > if anyone can explain this using the conventional concepts we mostly > use to interpret charts. Or should we say, we should revise the way > we look at charts? > > My data > 24 Dec 1982, 12.34 AM (00.34 Hrs), Dhaka, Bangladesh. > Means 90E25, 23N43, GMT+6. No DLS / DST. > > My first relationship was in Me-Mo-Ra and second one in Me-Ju-Ra. The > antardasha lords are quite reasonable, Moon in 7th house and Jupiter > is the 7th lord itself. But what is to note here, that both in the > cases the pratyantar lord is Rahu. How come it be, esp. both the > times? Also, each and every period of Rahu (pratyantar, or even > antar) are the best times for my relationship matters, sometimes even > better than Jupiter, the 7th lord itself! Rahu pratyantars even > SOLVED the problems I had been having sometimes! How come, Rahu is > such positive about this? What is the relation of Rahu with this and > why even it is positive? > > I would be indeed very interested to know what members have to say, > if anyone cares or feels interested. Anyone can email me personally > also, to tanweera > > I have a second part of the query, but asking that now will somewhat > help people explain it ! :-) > > Thanks, > Tanvir > > NB. This message is posted in total three forums, all separately. To > reach a larger number of people. No spamming or violation meant. > Sorry about it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Dear Tanvir Ji, For relationships we often see 7th and 9th house. As per KP astro principles, Rahu is in 9th house (Rahu is having 10 degree 40 min which is lesser then 14 degree 53 min of 10th Bhav, so this makes him in 9th) and also he is in his own nakshtra. So he is very very strong significator of 9th house. Probably this is the reason he is bringing new relationships and betterment in life. With Best Regards, Vidit , "Tanvir Chowdhury" <tanweera wrote: > > Dear all, > > I find my own chart to be interesting in one aspect that is why I am > presenting it before you - if anyone can explain the reason. Of > course I have my own way of explaining this but I am really > interested to see what learned astrologers have to say about this - > if anyone can explain this using the conventional concepts we mostly > use to interpret charts. Or should we say, we should revise the way > we look at charts? > > My data > 24 Dec 1982, 12.34 AM (00.34 Hrs), Dhaka, Bangladesh. > Means 90E25, 23N43, GMT+6. No DLS / DST. > > My first relationship was in Me-Mo-Ra and second one in Me-Ju-Ra. The > antardasha lords are quite reasonable, Moon in 7th house and Jupiter > is the 7th lord itself. But what is to note here, that both in the > cases the pratyantar lord is Rahu. How come it be, esp. both the > times? Also, each and every period of Rahu (pratyantar, or even > antar) are the best times for my relationship matters, sometimes even > better than Jupiter, the 7th lord itself! Rahu pratyantars even > SOLVED the problems I had been having sometimes! How come, Rahu is > such positive about this? What is the relation of Rahu with this and > why even it is positive? > > I would be indeed very interested to know what members have to say, > if anyone cares or feels interested. Anyone can email me personally > also, to tanweera > > I have a second part of the query, but asking that now will somewhat > help people explain it ! :-) > > Thanks, > Tanvir > > NB. This message is posted in total three forums, all separately. To > reach a larger number of people. No spamming or violation meant. > Sorry about it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Hi, Post the dates as some people here use 360 day/year, some use different ayanamsa. Stating dashas without knowing what parameters were used for that is no help. BTW Rahu is also a karaka for relationships. Maha and anter dasha lords have to permit the event. pratyantar dasha lord has a tertiary say. Satish --- Tanvir Chowdhury <king_tanvir > wrote: > Dear all, > > I find my own chart to be interesting in one aspect > that is why I am > presenting it before you - if anyone can explain the > reason. Of > course I have my own way of explaining this but I am > really > interested to see what learned astrologers have to > say about this - > if anyone can explain this using the conventional > concepts we mostly > use to interpret charts. Or should we say, we should > revise the way > we look at charts? > > My data > 24 Dec 1982, 12.34 AM (00.34 Hrs), Dhaka, > Bangladesh. > Means 90E25, 23N43, GMT+6. No DLS / DST. > > My first relationship was in Me-Mo-Ra and second one > in Me-Ju-Ra. The > antardasha lords are quite reasonable, Moon in 7th > house and Jupiter > is the 7th lord itself. But what is to note here, > that both in the > cases the pratyantar lord is Rahu. How come it be, > esp. both the > times? Also, each and every period of Rahu > (pratyantar, or even > antar) are the best times for my relationship > matters, sometimes even > better than Jupiter, the 7th lord itself! Rahu > pratyantars even > SOLVED the problems I had been having sometimes! How > come, Rahu is > such positive about this? What is the relation of > Rahu with this and > why even it is positive? > > I would be indeed very interested to know what > members have to say, > if anyone cares or feels interested. Anyone can > email me personally > also, to tanweera (AT) zipbd (DOT) com. > > I have a second part of the query, but asking that > now will somewhat > help people explain it ! :-) > > Thanks, > Tanvir > > NB. This message is posted in total three forums, > all separately. To > reach a larger number of people. No spamming or > violation meant. > Sorry about it. > > > > > > Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Dear all, I am sorry for the mistake made by me - a very bad mistake I admit, not to include the real timeframe / date but rather presenting it in a very personal way. Caused by being away from jyotish for a very good period :-) 1. I met the first young lady in the last weak of Sep 1999, after 24th to be precise. And from the first day we started falling into each other slowly and slowly and the whole month of Oct was of romance, so it happened in the Rahu pratyantar as derived from Lahiri (Within Oct). Interesting that I knew her by face for more than 1.5 years but did not know personally and when Me-Mo started I felt interested about her first, and with Rahu pratyantar starting, efforts were there from my part to get introduced with her that I succeed in the last weak of Sep, after about 20-25 days of effort ! 2. The second young lady I met in 14 May for the first time and then 6 July for the second time and then everything developed so fast. The exact date is 23 July starting from 3/4 AM if you want to be precise :-) I hope this helps. I am thankful to whoever has answered me, I got two replies in my own email address also. One from Bhaskar Maheswari Ji, and as I said I already have some own explanations about what I am pretty confident, and just interested to see how others explain it because I believe this cannot be explained through the concepts we generally use all the times so my point is are we missing some very valuable things of jyotish? Anyway just wanted to say that Bhaskar Ji's explanation matches to my own explanation a lot and the same approach I adopt all the time while analyzing charts and get very good result. Thanks, Tanvir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Dear all, I am sorry for the mistake made by me - a very bad mistake I admit, not to include the real timeframe / date but rather presenting it in a very personal way. Caused by being away from jyotish for a very good period :-) 1. I met the first young lady in the last weak of Sep 1999, after 24th to be precise. And from the first day we started falling into each other slowly and slowly and the whole month of Oct was of romance, so it happened in the Rahu pratyantar as derived from Lahiri (Within Oct). Interesting that I knew her by face for more than 1.5 years but did not know personally and when Me-Mo started I felt interested about her first, and with Rahu pratyantar starting, efforts were there from my part to get introduced with her that I succeed in the last weak of Sep, after about 20-25 days of effort ! 2. The second young lady I met in 14 May for the first time and then 6 July for the second time and then everything developed so fast. The exact date is 23 July starting from 3/4 AM if you want to be precise :-) I hope this helps. I am thankful to whoever has answered me, I got two replies in my own email address also. One from Bhaskar Maheswari Ji, and as I said I already have some own explanations about what I am pretty confident, and just interested to see how others explain it because I believe this cannot be explained through the concepts we generally use all the times so my point is are we missing some very valuable things of jyotish? Anyway just wanted to say that Bhaskar Ji's explanation matches to my own explanation a lot and the same approach I adopt all the time while analyzing charts and get very good result. Thanks, Tanvir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Dear Tanvir, Please confirm your lagna is Virgo 16 degrees 20' and odd. If that be so then using 360 Savana Day year the dashas operating on 24th September 1999 are : Mercury- Moon- Jupiter-Venus. For the second lady you have not given the year you met. Chandrashekhar. Tanvir Chowdhury wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am sorry for the mistake made by me - a very bad mistake I admit, > not to include the real timeframe / date but rather presenting it in > a very personal way. Caused by being away from jyotish for a very > good period :-) > > 1. I met the first young lady in the last weak of Sep 1999, after > 24th to be precise. And from the first day we started falling into > each other slowly and slowly and the whole month of Oct was of > romance, so it happened in the Rahu pratyantar as derived from Lahiri > (Within Oct). Interesting that I knew her by face for more than 1.5 > years but did not know personally and when Me-Mo started I felt > interested about her first, and with Rahu pratyantar starting, > efforts were there from my part to get introduced with her that I > succeed in the last weak of Sep, after about 20-25 days of effort ! > > 2. The second young lady I met in 14 May for the first time and then > 6 July for the second time and then everything developed so fast. The > exact date is 23 July starting from 3/4 AM if you want to be > precise :-) > > I hope this helps. > > I am thankful to whoever has answered me, I got two replies in my own > email address also. One from Bhaskar Maheswari Ji, and as I said I > already have some own explanations about what I am pretty confident, > and just interested to see how others explain it because I believe > this cannot be explained through the concepts we generally use all > the times so my point is are we missing some very valuable things of > jyotish? Anyway just wanted to say that Bhaskar Ji's explanation > matches to my own explanation a lot and the same approach I adopt all > the time while analyzing charts and get very good result. > > Thanks, > Tanvir. > > > ------ > > > > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.6/536 - Release 11/16/2006 3:51 PM > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 On 11/17/06, Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: > > Dear Tanvir, > > Please confirm your lagna is Virgo 16 degrees 20' and odd. If that be so > then using 360 Savana Day year the dashas operating on 24th September > 1999 are : Mercury- Moon- Jupiter-Venus. For the second lady you have > not given the year you met. > > Chandrashekhar. > I get Virgo lagna too Chandrashekhar. I think he met the second lady earlier this year; figured from his walking-on-air words Ramapriya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Yes my Asc is 16.20 Virgo. Sorry, "odd" means? The year of the second lady event is 2006. Thanks Tanvir , Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > Dear Tanvir, > > Please confirm your lagna is Virgo 16 degrees 20' and odd. If that be so > then using 360 Savana Day year the dashas operating on 24th September > 1999 are : Mercury- Moon- Jupiter-Venus. For the second lady you have > not given the year you met. > > Chandrashekhar. > > Tanvir Chowdhury wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > I am sorry for the mistake made by me - a very bad mistake I admit, > > not to include the real timeframe / date but rather presenting it in > > a very personal way. Caused by being away from jyotish for a very > > good period :-) > > > > 1. I met the first young lady in the last weak of Sep 1999, after > > 24th to be precise. And from the first day we started falling into > > each other slowly and slowly and the whole month of Oct was of > > romance, so it happened in the Rahu pratyantar as derived from Lahiri > > (Within Oct). Interesting that I knew her by face for more than 1.5 > > years but did not know personally and when Me-Mo started I felt > > interested about her first, and with Rahu pratyantar starting, > > efforts were there from my part to get introduced with her that I > > succeed in the last weak of Sep, after about 20-25 days of effort ! > > > > 2. The second young lady I met in 14 May for the first time and then > > 6 July for the second time and then everything developed so fast. The > > exact date is 23 July starting from 3/4 AM if you want to be > > precise :-) > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > I am thankful to whoever has answered me, I got two replies in my own > > email address also. One from Bhaskar Maheswari Ji, and as I said I > > already have some own explanations about what I am pretty confident, > > and just interested to see how others explain it because I believe > > this cannot be explained through the concepts we generally use all > > the times so my point is are we missing some very valuable things of > > jyotish? Anyway just wanted to say that Bhaskar Ji's explanation > > matches to my own explanation a lot and the same approach I adopt all > > the time while analyzing charts and get very good result. > > > > Thanks, > > Tanvir. > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.6/536 - Release 11/16/2006 3:51 PM > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 tanvir ji i think app rinee hogaya bhasker ji ka i think god plays many leela's ?raj k. Tanvir Chowdhury <king_tanvir > wrote: Dear all, I am sorry for the mistake made by me - a very bad mistake I admit, not to include the real timeframe / date but rather presenting it in a very personal way. Caused by being away from jyotish for a very good period :-) 1. I met the first young lady in the last weak of Sep 1999, after 24th to be precise. And from the first day we started falling into each other slowly and slowly and the whole month of Oct was of romance, so it happened in the Rahu pratyantar as derived from Lahiri (Within Oct). Interesting that I knew her by face for more than 1.5 years but did not know personally and when Me-Mo started I felt interested about her first, and with Rahu pratyantar starting, efforts were there from my part to get introduced with her that I succeed in the last weak of Sep, after about 20-25 days of effort ! 2. The second young lady I met in 14 May for the first time and then 6 July for the second time and then everything developed so fast. The exact date is 23 July starting from 3/4 AM if you want to be precise :-) I hope this helps. I am thankful to whoever has answered me, I got two replies in my own email address also. One from Bhaskar Maheswari Ji, and as I said I already have some own explanations about what I am pretty confident, and just interested to see how others explain it because I believe this cannot be explained through the concepts we generally use all the times so my point is are we missing some very valuable things of jyotish? Anyway just wanted to say that Bhaskar Ji's explanation matches to my own explanation a lot and the same approach I adopt all the time while analyzing charts and get very good result. Thanks, Tanvir. Sponsored Link Degrees for working adults in as fast as 1 year. Bachelors, Masters, Associates. Top schools Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 hare rama krsna Dear Srivasta, Merci&omments under. Regards Rafal Gendarz , "swami" <swami_rcs wrote: > > > II Om Gurave Namah II > Hari om , Friend, > Dear Rafal, > Very nicely you have explained doubt of shree Tanveer ji.I have a little technical re-thinking about your reply and last sentence. > will you kindly respond to following. > > a.. Works with Kumbha and Makara Lagna's so if You are thinking all the time then You have Makar-Lagna while being hot- tempered with love for music gives Kum-Lagna in D9.If Lagna Navamsa is rectified to Aquarius PD application of Trine principle fails to apply. [rafal] then Makara.. > b.. (Rahu is not lagnesh .He is in Lagna navamsa instead.) for the time Sh Tanveer has given.Pratyantara is all about trikona's in Varga. Rahu is Lagnesh. Could It be read instead as "Pratyantara is all about trikona's in Varga. Rahu is in Lagn. [rafal] I had rahu in 12 bhava with aquarius Lagna. yes the planet in kona qualify.. > c.. How you define activation , and what is precisely implied by it. You say Gu is activating A7 , that means during Bhukti of Guru arudhas in II nd will rise and people will enter into life to influence?fine . [rafal] gana of devata vs gana of mo/l shows if period is good. arudhas in kona shows people we deal with. graha shows tattva and emotions...etc..etc.. Kindly explain if activation encompasses all like, rising of arudhas, bolting the matter by argla etc. [rafal] aspect activate by desire. argala shows what is in our range. rasidrsti is knowledge and birth-connections. > Thanking you in anticipation. > > > > Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah > Sarve Santu Niramaya > Sarve Bhadrani Pasyantu > Ma Kashchid Dukh Bhaag Bhaveit > HARI OM TATSAT > ------------------------ > R.C.Srivastava > E-mail : swami_rcs > http://www.cosmograce.com > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > ------------------------ > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy > radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy > our sins, and guide us in the right direction! > > > - > Rafal Gendarz > vedic astrology ; sri ; sohamsa > Friday, November 17, 2006 6:20 PM > [Om Krishna Guru] Re: [vedic astrology] Would anyone explain? > > > > hare rama krsna > Dear Tanvir, > > Its very nice to see that You are doing some research about relationships. > I would like to recommend You Crux of Vedic Astrology of Sanjay Rath to check how Your principles are working. Its very neccesary book to deal with researches like that. > > NAVAMSA IS CRUCIAL FOR RELATIONSHIPS: > > a.. Buddha Mahadasa has to influence Lagnesh in Varga to activate it. Here Argalas are important. Buddha has argala on Lagnesh in Varga related to relationships - Navaamsa. > b.. Antara dasa must have something to do with specific person - so specific bhava like 7H, 2H, 9H (as antardasa shows people we meet on our way). First relation Mo - aspects 7L(first relation), Second relation Ju is 2L (8H from 7H=second relation). Mo is 5L in D1 while Gu is activating A7 and 7L in D1 (being in 12H from it). > c.. Pratyantara is all about trikona's in Varga. Rahu is Lagnesh. > This works with Kumbha and Makara Lagna's so if You are thinking all the time then You have Makar-Lagna while being hot-tempered with love for music gives Kum-Lagna in D9. > > > > > > Regards > Rafal Gendarz > > - > Tanvir Chowdhury > vedic astrology > Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:23 PM > [vedic astrology] Would anyone explain? > > > Dear all, > > I find my own chart to be interesting in one aspect that is why I am > presenting it before you - if anyone can explain the reason. Of > course I have my own way of explaining this but I am really > interested to see what learned astrologers have to say about this - > if anyone can explain this using the conventional concepts we mostly > use to interpret charts. Or should we say, we should revise the way > we look at charts? > > My data > 24 Dec 1982, 12.34 AM (00.34 Hrs), Dhaka, Bangladesh. > Means 90E25, 23N43, GMT+6. No DLS / DST. > > My first relationship was in Me-Mo-Ra and second one in Me-Ju- Ra. The > antardasha lords are quite reasonable, Moon in 7th house and Jupiter > is the 7th lord itself. But what is to note here, that both in the > cases the pratyantar lord is Rahu. How come it be, esp. both the > times? Also, each and every period of Rahu (pratyantar, or even > antar) are the best times for my relationship matters, sometimes even > better than Jupiter, the 7th lord itself! Rahu pratyantars even > SOLVED the problems I had been having sometimes! How come, Rahu is > such positive about this? What is the relation of Rahu with this and > why even it is positive? > > I would be indeed very interested to know what members have to say, > if anyone cares or feels interested. Anyone can email me personally > also, to tanweera > > I have a second part of the query, but asking that now will somewhat > help people explain it ! :-) > > Thanks, > Tanvir > > NB. This message is posted in total three forums, all separately. To > reach a larger number of people. No spamming or violation meant. > Sorry about it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 Dear Ramapriya, That is pretty astute. Take care, Chandrashekhar. D Ramapriya wrote: > > On 11/17/06, Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 (AT) (DOT) co.uk > <chandrashekhar46%40.co.uk>> wrote: > > > > Dear Tanvir, > > > > Please confirm your lagna is Virgo 16 degrees 20' and odd. If that be so > > then using 360 Savana Day year the dashas operating on 24th September > > 1999 are : Mercury- Moon- Jupiter-Venus. For the second lady you have > > not given the year you met. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > I get Virgo lagna too Chandrashekhar. I think he met the second lady > earlier > this year; figured from his walking-on-air words > > Ramapriya > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 Dear Tanvir, Odd is 38.98". Second incident period is Mer-Sat-Sat for July events. Chandrashekhar. Tanvir Chowdhury wrote: > > Yes my Asc is 16.20 Virgo. Sorry, "odd" means? The year of the second > lady event is 2006. > > Thanks > Tanvir > > > <%40>, Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > > > Dear Tanvir, > > > > Please confirm your lagna is Virgo 16 degrees 20' and odd. If that > be so > > then using 360 Savana Day year the dashas operating on 24th > September > > 1999 are : Mercury- Moon- Jupiter-Venus. For the second lady you > have > > not given the year you met. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > Tanvir Chowdhury wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I am sorry for the mistake made by me - a very bad mistake I > admit, > > > not to include the real timeframe / date but rather presenting it > in > > > a very personal way. Caused by being away from jyotish for a very > > > good period :-) > > > > > > 1. I met the first young lady in the last weak of Sep 1999, after > > > 24th to be precise. And from the first day we started falling into > > > each other slowly and slowly and the whole month of Oct was of > > > romance, so it happened in the Rahu pratyantar as derived from > Lahiri > > > (Within Oct). Interesting that I knew her by face for more than > 1.5 > > > years but did not know personally and when Me-Mo started I felt > > > interested about her first, and with Rahu pratyantar starting, > > > efforts were there from my part to get introduced with her that I > > > succeed in the last weak of Sep, after about 20-25 days of > effort ! > > > > > > 2. The second young lady I met in 14 May for the first time and > then > > > 6 July for the second time and then everything developed so fast. > The > > > exact date is 23 July starting from 3/4 AM if you want to be > > > precise :-) > > > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > > > I am thankful to whoever has answered me, I got two replies in my > own > > > email address also. One from Bhaskar Maheswari Ji, and as I said I > > > already have some own explanations about what I am pretty > confident, > > > and just interested to see how others explain it because I believe > > > this cannot be explained through the concepts we generally use all > > > the times so my point is are we missing some very valuable things > of > > > jyotish? Anyway just wanted to say that Bhaskar Ji's explanation > > > matches to my own explanation a lot and the same approach I adopt > all > > > the time while analyzing charts and get very good result. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Tanvir. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.6/536 - Release Date: > 11/16/2006 3:51 PM > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Rahu is in its own nakshatra, sub lord is Saturn i.e. 5th HL. Prati- sub lord is also Saturn. Therefore, Rahu pratyantar may be giving u 5th house results. vedic astrology, "Tanvir Chowdhury" <king_tanvir wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am sorry for the mistake made by me - a very bad mistake I admit, > not to include the real timeframe / date but rather presenting it in > a very personal way. Caused by being away from jyotish for a very > good period :-) > > 1. I met the first young lady in the last weak of Sep 1999, after > 24th to be precise. And from the first day we started falling into > each other slowly and slowly and the whole month of Oct was of > romance, so it happened in the Rahu pratyantar as derived from Lahiri > (Within Oct). Interesting that I knew her by face for more than 1.5 > years but did not know personally and when Me-Mo started I felt > interested about her first, and with Rahu pratyantar starting, > efforts were there from my part to get introduced with her that I > succeed in the last weak of Sep, after about 20-25 days of effort ! > > 2. The second young lady I met in 14 May for the first time and then > 6 July for the second time and then everything developed so fast. The > exact date is 23 July starting from 3/4 AM if you want to be > precise :-) > > I hope this helps. > > I am thankful to whoever has answered me, I got two replies in my own > email address also. One from Bhaskar Maheswari Ji, and as I said I > already have some own explanations about what I am pretty confident, > and just interested to see how others explain it because I believe > this cannot be explained through the concepts we generally use all > the times so my point is are we missing some very valuable things of > jyotish? Anyway just wanted to say that Bhaskar Ji's explanation > matches to my own explanation a lot and the same approach I adopt all > the time while analyzing charts and get very good result. > > Thanks, > Tanvir. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.