Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, Prashantiji, Rohini Devi ) This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me some confusion. Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a person of the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native with the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon in Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus ascendant should avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon represent the partner type of person one is attracted to?) Comments would be appreciated. Thanks. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Question not being asked on behalf of Rohini Devi (who's dat?) How did you arrive at the qualifier "OFTEN"? Based on how many observations? Over what time period, etc If astrology must be touted willy-nilly as a science, we better collect and put our facts across seriously! Sounds reasonable, fellow 'scientists'? RR , "krishnan2804" <krishnan2804 wrote: > > Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, Prashantiji, > Rohini Devi ) > > This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me some > confusion. > > Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a person of > the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native with > the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon in > Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus ascendant should > avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. > > However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon represent > the partner type of person one is attracted to?) > > Comments would be appreciated. > > Thanks. > > --- End forwarded message --- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Apologies for my error in assuming your gender. However one can be easily mislead by the name 'Rohini' which is generally associated with females and of course your grammatical style which is very Venusian. So Rohiniji your queries pertaining to the use of 'often' would have to be directed at the practising astrologers that make such recommendations. One assumes they are based on vast experience or a basic blind adherence to a rule that they may have read in some text. It is due to this very ambiguity that I have raised this point. I also don't think Jyotish can be 'proved' or measured by statistical inference. Statistics, as you may know, are very black and white and leave out the oh-so colourful details which are of topmost importance Jyotish. Not leaving forgetting their unreliability which is represented by the standard error. In this context I would not label Joyitsh as an exact science, but more of an art based on intuition and the observations of patterns combined with a highly refined level of synthesis - all of which cannot be quantified. And there it is purely philosophical response (two can play that game! ). P.S. do you have Saturn in either Gemini/Virgo? , "Rohiniranjan" <jyotish_vani wrote: > > Question not being asked on behalf of Rohini Devi (who's dat?) > > How did you arrive at the qualifier "OFTEN"? > > Based on how many observations? Over what time period, etc > > If astrology must be touted willy-nilly as a science, we better > collect and put our facts across seriously! > > Sounds reasonable, fellow 'scientists'? > > RR > > , "krishnan2804" > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, Prashantiji, > > Rohini Devi ) > > > > This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me some > > confusion. > > > > Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a person of > > the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native with > > the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon in > > Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus ascendant > should > > avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. > > > > However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon represent > > the partner type of person one is attracted to?) > > > > Comments would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks. > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Neither statistics black and white or coloured version, nor philosophy is involved, Mr Krishnan2804. When someone says "often" it means simply that it is a frequently occuring or observed phenomenon. And since it is observed, it has got to have come from a survey or personal observation. And since you made the observation that <<astrologers often recommended...>> I was right in asking the source of the statement and should not have to go to the astrologers who were being observed and reported about! Simple logic, no run-on sentences! And I have gone on record many a times that my english is very poor. Still if you must pick on that and criticise my writing style, well obviously I cannot stop you from doing that, now, can I? Does this make sense or it is too complex still ;-) RR <Oh now that the gender misconception has been corrected from your mind, let us address another misconception: I do not play games! You may say I am a perfect couch potato!> , "krishnan2804" <krishnan2804 wrote: > > Apologies for my error in assuming your gender. However one can be > easily mislead by the name 'Rohini' which is generally associated > with females and of course your grammatical style which is very > Venusian. > > So Rohiniji your queries pertaining to the use of 'often' would have > to be directed at the practising astrologers that make such > recommendations. One assumes they are based on vast experience or a > basic blind adherence to a rule that they may have read in some text. > It is due to this very ambiguity that I have raised this point. > > I also don't think Jyotish can be 'proved' or measured by > statistical inference. Statistics, as you may know, are very black > and white and leave out the oh-so colourful details which are of > topmost importance Jyotish. Not leaving forgetting their > unreliability which is represented by the standard error. In this > context I would not label Joyitsh as an exact science, but more of > an art based on intuition and the observations of patterns combined > with a highly refined level of synthesis - all of which cannot be > quantified. > > And there it is purely philosophical response (two can play that > game! ). > > P.S. do you have Saturn in either Gemini/Virgo? > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > Question not being asked on behalf of Rohini Devi (who's dat?) > > > > How did you arrive at the qualifier "OFTEN"? > > > > Based on how many observations? Over what time period, etc > > > > If astrology must be touted willy-nilly as a science, we better > > collect and put our facts across seriously! > > > > Sounds reasonable, fellow 'scientists'? > > > > RR > > > > , "krishnan2804" > > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, Prashantiji, > > > Rohini Devi ) > > > > > > This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me > some > > > confusion. > > > > > > Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a person > of > > > the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native > with > > > the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon in > > > Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus ascendant > > should > > > avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. > > > > > > However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon > represent > > > the partner type of person one is attracted to?) > > > > > > Comments would be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Mr Ranjan, It seems that confusion has arrested your usually sharp intellectual faculties, proving that you are human after all! It's all too easy to believe in ones self-created image (Rahu) and become intoxicated by the knowledge one acquires after years of perseverance. Wisdom (Jupiter), as with all excesses, has its drawbacks........ You say you was "right in asking the source of the statement" but if you had paid due attention to my original message, it would have been easy to derive that the source were those astrologers that I have come across. The logic here is, as put in your own words - 'simple'. I haven't criticsed your writing style as such, rather its content and depth (lack of). You may have published ever-so-many articles but your contributions on this forum - by which you will be judged solely in this arena - borders on extreme irellevencey. You have truly demonstrated how powerfully English literature can be applied 'politically' in jyotish, for answering everything but the question (a very recent example: Do you have Saturn in Gemini/Virgo?). So there we have it another wasted message, responding to your irrational, irrelevant and 'complex' communications, which could have been better spent discussing and *sharing* knowledge. auf weiderdsehn Krishnan , "Rohiniranjan" <jyotish_vani wrote: > > Neither statistics black and white or coloured version, nor > philosophy is involved, Mr Krishnan2804. When someone says "often" it > means simply that it is a frequently occuring or observed phenomenon. > And since it is observed, it has got to have come from a survey or > personal observation. > > And since you made the observation that <<astrologers often > recommended...>> I was right in asking the source of the statement > and should not have to go to the astrologers who were being observed > and reported about! Simple logic, no run-on sentences! And I have > gone on record many a times that my english is very poor. Still if > you must pick on that and criticise my writing style, well obviously > I cannot stop you from doing that, now, can I? > > Does this make sense or it is too complex still ;-) > > RR > > <Oh now that the gender misconception has been corrected from your > mind, let us address another misconception: I do not play games! You > may say I am a perfect couch potato!> > > > , "krishnan2804" > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > Apologies for my error in assuming your gender. However one can be > > easily mislead by the name 'Rohini' which is generally associated > > with females and of course your grammatical style which is very > > Venusian. > > > > So Rohiniji your queries pertaining to the use of 'often' would > have > > to be directed at the practising astrologers that make such > > recommendations. One assumes they are based on vast experience or a > > basic blind adherence to a rule that they may have read in some > text. > > It is due to this very ambiguity that I have raised this point. > > > > I also don't think Jyotish can be 'proved' or measured by > > statistical inference. Statistics, as you may know, are very black > > and white and leave out the oh-so colourful details which are of > > topmost importance Jyotish. Not leaving forgetting their > > unreliability which is represented by the standard error. In this > > context I would not label Joyitsh as an exact science, but more of > > an art based on intuition and the observations of patterns combined > > with a highly refined level of synthesis - all of which cannot be > > quantified. > > > > And there it is purely philosophical response (two can play that > > game! ). > > > > P.S. do you have Saturn in either Gemini/Virgo? > > > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > Question not being asked on behalf of Rohini Devi (who's dat?) > > > > > > How did you arrive at the qualifier "OFTEN"? > > > > > > Based on how many observations? Over what time period, etc > > > > > > If astrology must be touted willy-nilly as a science, we better > > > collect and put our facts across seriously! > > > > > > Sounds reasonable, fellow 'scientists'? > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , "krishnan2804" > > > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, Prashantiji, > > > > Rohini Devi ) > > > > > > > > This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me > > some > > > > confusion. > > > > > > > > Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a > person > > of > > > > the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native > > with > > > > the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon in > > > > Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus ascendant > > > should > > > > avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. > > > > > > > > However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon > > represent > > > > the partner type of person one is attracted to?) > > > > > > > > Comments would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Mr Ranjan, It seems that confusion has arrested your usually sharp intellectual faculties, proving that you are human after all! It's all too easy to believe in ones self-created image (Rahu) and become intoxicated by the knowledge one acquires after years of perseverance. Wisdom (Jupiter) as with all excesses, has its drawbacks........ You say you was "right in asking the source of the statement" but if you had paid due attention to my original message, it would have been easy to derive that the source were those astrologers that I have come across. The logic here is, as put in your own words - 'simple'. I haven't criticsed your writing style as such, rather its content and depth (lack of). You may have published ever-so-many articles but your contributions on this forum - by which you will be judged solely in this arena - borders on extreme irellevencey. You have truly demonstrated how powerfully English literature can be applied 'politically' in jyotish, for answering everything but the question (a very recent example: Do you have Saturn in Gemini/Virgo?). Oh and thank you for *sharing* your pearls of wisdom, it is enlightening to learn that the Moon is the karak for Mother. The Moon was mentioned as an example. Please re-read the message with due attention. So there we have it another wasted message, responding to your irrational, irrelevant and 'complex' communications, which could have been better spent discussing and *sharing* knowledge. auf weiderdsehn Krishnan P.S. Nice to learn that I can also deliver vocabulary that you have difficulty relating to!Vensuian grammar rules the day............ The Moon was mentioend as an example. Please re-read the message with due attention. Oh and thnak you for *sahring* your pearls of wisdom,it is engliheting to learn that the Moon is the karak for Mother. Nice to learn that I can also delivr volcablary that you have diffculty relating to! , "Rohiniranjan" <jyotish_vani wrote: > > Neither statistics black and white or coloured version, nor > philosophy is involved, Mr Krishnan2804. When someone says "often" it > means simply that it is a frequently occuring or observed phenomenon. > And since it is observed, it has got to have come from a survey or > personal observation. > > And since you made the observation that <<astrologers often > recommended...>> I was right in asking the source of the statement > and should not have to go to the astrologers who were being observed > and reported about! Simple logic, no run-on sentences! And I have > gone on record many a times that my english is very poor. Still if > you must pick on that and criticise my writing style, well obviously > I cannot stop you from doing that, now, can I? > > Does this make sense or it is too complex still ;-) > > RR > > <Oh now that the gender misconception has been corrected from your > mind, let us address another misconception: I do not play games! You > may say I am a perfect couch potato!> > > > , "krishnan2804" > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > Apologies for my error in assuming your gender. However one can be > > easily mislead by the name 'Rohini' which is generally associated > > with females and of course your grammatical style which is very > > Venusian. > > > > So Rohiniji your queries pertaining to the use of 'often' would > have > > to be directed at the practising astrologers that make such > > recommendations. One assumes they are based on vast experience or a > > basic blind adherence to a rule that they may have read in some > text. > > It is due to this very ambiguity that I have raised this point. > > > > I also don't think Jyotish can be 'proved' or measured by > > statistical inference. Statistics, as you may know, are very black > > and white and leave out the oh-so colourful details which are of > > topmost importance Jyotish. Not leaving forgetting their > > unreliability which is represented by the standard error. In this > > context I would not label Joyitsh as an exact science, but more of > > an art based on intuition and the observations of patterns combined > > with a highly refined level of synthesis - all of which cannot be > > quantified. > > > > And there it is purely philosophical response (two can play that > > game! ). > > > > P.S. do you have Saturn in either Gemini/Virgo? > > > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > Question not being asked on behalf of Rohini Devi (who's dat?) > > > > > > How did you arrive at the qualifier "OFTEN"? > > > > > > Based on how many observations? Over what time period, etc > > > > > > If astrology must be touted willy-nilly as a science, we better > > > collect and put our facts across seriously! > > > > > > Sounds reasonable, fellow 'scientists'? > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , "krishnan2804" > > > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, Prashantiji, > > > > Rohini Devi ) > > > > > > > > This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me > > some > > > > confusion. > > > > > > > > Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a > person > > of > > > > the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native > > with > > > > the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon in > > > > Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus ascendant > > > should > > > > avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. > > > > > > > > However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon > > represent > > > > the partner type of person one is attracted to?) > > > > > > > > Comments would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Krishnan ji, You may be having a lot of fun with this kind of vitriolic targetting of me and trying to create this kind of smoke and mirrors show which has the following flaws: I have never ever said or claimed that I am a great astrologer or even a prolific writer. Please quote any statements from me that you recall or can actually quote. If someone else praises me and it bothers you, then is that my fault :-) Also your original postings said (go to the foot of this message and verify), "--- > > Astrologers often recommended that one ..." The descriptor of frequency 'often' obviously came from you and not from astrologers. I was right in questioning you about the source of this conclusion you arrived at. Lot of people, even famous astrologers have this tendency to be somewhat lax when tossing such estimations at others. Things such as '82%' have this attribute or such and such is often seen, etc. These estimates give the wrong impression to others who then propagate the myth. Another example of a popular myth is that "Most jyotishis use Lahiri ayanamsha!". Who has counted, who really knows! Anyway, this is not going to go anywhere. My condolences if I pressed your buttons or rattled your cage :-) RR In , "krishnan2804" <krishnan2804 wrote: > > Mr Ranjan, > > It seems that confusion has arrested your usually sharp intellectual > faculties, proving that you are human after all! It's all too easy > to believe in ones self-created image (Rahu) and become intoxicated > by the knowledge one acquires after years of perseverance. Wisdom > (Jupiter) as with all excesses, has its drawbacks........ > > You say you was "right in asking the source of the statement" but if > you had paid due attention to my original message, it would have > been easy to derive that the source were those astrologers that I > have come across. The logic here is, as put in your own words - > 'simple'. > > I haven't criticsed your writing style as such, rather its content > and depth (lack of). You may have published ever-so-many articles > but your contributions on this forum - by which you will be judged > solely in this arena - borders on extreme irellevencey. You have > truly demonstrated how powerfully English literature can be > applied 'politically' in jyotish, for answering everything but the > question (a very recent example: Do you have Saturn in > Gemini/Virgo?). > > Oh and thank you for *sharing* your pearls of wisdom, it is > enlightening to learn that the Moon is the karak for Mother. The > Moon was mentioned as an example. Please re-read the message with > due attention. > > > So there we have it another wasted message, responding to your > irrational, irrelevant and 'complex' communications, which could > have been better spent discussing and *sharing* knowledge. > > auf weiderdsehn > > Krishnan > > P.S. Nice to learn that I can also deliver vocabulary that you have > difficulty relating to!Vensuian grammar rules the day............ > > > The Moon was mentioend as an example. Please re-read the message > with due attention. > > Oh and thnak you for *sahring* your pearls of wisdom,it is > engliheting to learn that the Moon is the karak for Mother. > > Nice to learn that I can also delivr volcablary that you have > diffculty relating to! > > , "Rohiniranjan" > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > Neither statistics black and white or coloured version, nor > > philosophy is involved, Mr Krishnan2804. When someone says "often" > it > > means simply that it is a frequently occuring or observed > phenomenon. > > And since it is observed, it has got to have come from a survey or > > personal observation. > > > > And since you made the observation that <<astrologers often > > recommended...>> I was right in asking the source of the statement > > and should not have to go to the astrologers who were being > observed > > and reported about! Simple logic, no run-on sentences! And I have > > gone on record many a times that my english is very poor. Still if > > you must pick on that and criticise my writing style, well > obviously > > I cannot stop you from doing that, now, can I? > > > > Does this make sense or it is too complex still ;-) > > > > RR > > > > <Oh now that the gender misconception has been corrected from your > > mind, let us address another misconception: I do not play games! > You > > may say I am a perfect couch potato!> > > > > > > , "krishnan2804" > > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > > > Apologies for my error in assuming your gender. However one can > be > > > easily mislead by the name 'Rohini' which is generally > associated > > > with females and of course your grammatical style which is very > > > Venusian. > > > > > > So Rohiniji your queries pertaining to the use of 'often' would > > have > > > to be directed at the practising astrologers that make such > > > recommendations. One assumes they are based on vast experience > or a > > > basic blind adherence to a rule that they may have read in some > > text. > > > It is due to this very ambiguity that I have raised this point. > > > > > > I also don't think Jyotish can be 'proved' or measured by > > > statistical inference. Statistics, as you may know, are very > black > > > and white and leave out the oh-so colourful details which are of > > > topmost importance Jyotish. Not leaving forgetting their > > > unreliability which is represented by the standard error. In > this > > > context I would not label Joyitsh as an exact science, but more > of > > > an art based on intuition and the observations of patterns > combined > > > with a highly refined level of synthesis - all of which cannot > be > > > quantified. > > > > > > And there it is purely philosophical response (two can play that > > > game! ). > > > > > > P.S. do you have Saturn in either Gemini/Virgo? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Question not being asked on behalf of Rohini Devi (who's dat?) > > > > > > > > How did you arrive at the qualifier "OFTEN"? > > > > > > > > Based on how many observations? Over what time period, etc > > > > > > > > If astrology must be touted willy-nilly as a science, we > better > > > > collect and put our facts across seriously! > > > > > > > > Sounds reasonable, fellow 'scientists'? > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , "krishnan2804" > > > > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, > Prashantiji, > > > > > Rohini Devi ) > > > > > > > > > > This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me > > > some > > > > > confusion. > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a > > person > > > of > > > > > the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native > > > with > > > > > the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon > in > > > > > Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus > ascendant > > > > should > > > > > avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. > > > > > > > > > > However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon > > > represent > > > > > the partner type of person one is attracted to?) > > > > > > > > > > Comments would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2006 Report Share Posted November 20, 2006 Maniv alias Krishnan, You made a mistake by sending the same reply using your two ids. one, maniv1321 (AT) (DOT) co.uk, second, krishnan2804 (AT) (DOT) co.in . Earlier, you have been involved in serious arguments with some members of this group, using your maniv id and signing yourself as Maniv. Now, you are Krishnan and still arguing. You are using two different ids to send replies to this group. You are a member of this group using maniv1321 (AT) (DOT) co.uk since September 13, 2005. You are well aware that Rohini Ji is an active member and is a Man. Rohini Ji's photograph is also uploaded in the photo section of this group. Still, you tried to provoke him by questioning his gender, through this new id posing as Krishnan. Astrological knowledge and intellect apart, if you lack the basic politeness and seek only arguments, then there is no reason why you should be here in this group. If you do not give a suitable explanation within 24 hours, you will be banned from this group. Moderator, JR group - krishnan2804 Monday, 20 November, 2006 00:33 Re: Opposites Attract? Mr Ranjan, It seems that confusion has arrested your usually sharp intellectual faculties, proving that you are human after all! It's all too easy to believe in ones self-created image (Rahu) and become intoxicated by the knowledge one acquires after years of perseverance. Wisdom (Jupiter) as with all excesses, has its drawbacks........ You say you was "right in asking the source of the statement" but if you had paid due attention to my original message, it would have been easy to derive that the source were those astrologers that I have come across. The logic here is, as put in your own words - 'simple'. I haven't criticsed your writing style as such, rather its content and depth (lack of). You may have published ever-so-many articles but your contributions on this forum - by which you will be judged solely in this arena - borders on extreme irellevencey. You have truly demonstrated how powerfully English literature can be applied 'politically' in jyotish, for answering everything but the question (a very recent example: Do you have Saturn in Gemini/Virgo?). Oh and thank you for *sharing* your pearls of wisdom, it is enlightening to learn that the Moon is the karak for Mother. The Moon was mentioned as an example. Please re-read the message with due attention. So there we have it another wasted message, responding to your irrational, irrelevant and 'complex' communications, which could have been better spent discussing and *sharing* knowledge. auf weiderdsehn Krishnan P.S. Nice to learn that I can also deliver vocabulary that you have difficulty relating to!Vensuian grammar rules the day............ The Moon was mentioend as an example. Please re-read the message with due attention. Oh and thnak you for *sahring* your pearls of wisdom,it is engliheting to learn that the Moon is the karak for Mother. Nice to learn that I can also delivr volcablary that you have diffculty relating to! , "Rohiniranjan" <jyotish_vani wrote: > > Neither statistics black and white or coloured version, nor > philosophy is involved, Mr Krishnan2804. When someone says "often" it > means simply that it is a frequently occuring or observed phenomenon. > And since it is observed, it has got to have come from a survey or > personal observation. > > And since you made the observation that <<astrologers often > recommended...>> I was right in asking the source of the statement > and should not have to go to the astrologers who were being observed > and reported about! Simple logic, no run-on sentences! And I have > gone on record many a times that my english is very poor. Still if > you must pick on that and criticise my writing style, well obviously > I cannot stop you from doing that, now, can I? > > Does this make sense or it is too complex still ;-) > > RR > > <Oh now that the gender misconception has been corrected from your > mind, let us address another misconception: I do not play games! You > may say I am a perfect couch potato!> > > > , "krishnan2804" > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > Apologies for my error in assuming your gender. However one can be > > easily mislead by the name 'Rohini' which is generally associated > > with females and of course your grammatical style which is very > > Venusian. > > > > So Rohiniji your queries pertaining to the use of 'often' would > have > > to be directed at the practising astrologers that make such > > recommendations. One assumes they are based on vast experience or a > > basic blind adherence to a rule that they may have read in some > text. > > It is due to this very ambiguity that I have raised this point. > > > > I also don't think Jyotish can be 'proved' or measured by > > statistical inference. Statistics, as you may know, are very black > > and white and leave out the oh-so colourful details which are of > > topmost importance Jyotish. Not leaving forgetting their > > unreliability which is represented by the standard error. In this > > context I would not label Joyitsh as an exact science, but more of > > an art based on intuition and the observations of patterns combined > > with a highly refined level of synthesis - all of which cannot be > > quantified. > > > > And there it is purely philosophical response (two can play that > > game! ). > > > > P.S. do you have Saturn in either Gemini/Virgo? > > > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > Question not being asked on behalf of Rohini Devi (who's dat?) > > > > > > How did you arrive at the qualifier "OFTEN"? > > > > > > Based on how many observations? Over what time period, etc > > > > > > If astrology must be touted willy-nilly as a science, we better > > > collect and put our facts across seriously! > > > > > > Sounds reasonable, fellow 'scientists'? > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , "krishnan2804" > > > <krishnan2804@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Members & experianced Jyotishis (Ashutoshki, Prashantiji, > > > > Rohini Devi ) > > > > > > > > This is probably a very elementary query but it's causing me > > some > > > > confusion. > > > > > > > > Astrologers often recommended that one should not marry a > person > > of > > > > the opposite rising sign/ Chandra rasi. For example a native > > with > > > > the Moon in Capricorn should not marry someone with the Moon in > > > > Cancer/Cancer ascendant and vice versa, or a Taurus ascendant > > > should > > > > avoid marriage with a Scorpio ascendant. > > > > > > > > However would not the 7th house from the ascendant/Moon > > represent > > > > the partner type of person one is attracted to?) > > > > > > > > Comments would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.