Guest guest Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Prof Richard Weikart, again, as horrified by student views on the moral neutrality of Hitler: A number of years ago two intelligent students surprised me in a class discussion by defending the proposition that Hitler was neither good nor evil. Though I kept my composure, I was horrified. One of the worst mass murderers in history wasn't evil? How could they believe this? How could they justify such a view? They did it by appealing to Darwinism. More: http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-did-hitler-believe- about.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suchandra Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Prof Richard Weikart, again, as horrified by student views on the moral neutrality of Hitler: A number of years ago two intelligent students surprised me in a class discussion by defending the proposition that Hitler was neither good nor evil. Though I kept my composure, I was horrified. One of the worst mass murderers in history wasn't evil? How could they believe this? How could they justify such a view? They did it by appealing to Darwinism. More: http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-did-hitler-believe- about.html This is just another "ISKCON internal" highlight - Hitler was ok because he fits into Charles Darwin's evolution theory...nice ISKCON katha!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.