A suggestion2all serious students & researchers who r fed up! 25/11 p2

[Guest guest]

Dear RRji,

i did not mean any known databases, I meant our own individual collection over the years, firstly as a case study excercise all above 50 yrs old people can be covered then the younger if there is something unique or related to a topic then we r discussing.

I have done so on

5th Guru and Sons

on rahu in 5th

dusthanas etc. and know for sure I have not breached anyones trust in doing it. as none of u will know them anyway none of them or super stars or in the news kind.

 

btw is the 20/11/49, 21.16, Ujjain ur data? not able to say so clearly but some ref somewhere in ir writings make me feel so....! unless u confrim eitherway can't say.

 

 

 

Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Stop teasing me brother. Someone of his calibre would not even have

the time to spare for me!

 

I am humble and know my worth -- <heading towards the parrot punditji

who welcomes me with a smile and is right next to the chaat-house

(actually a thella) where Purushottam ji made the mirchi pakoraas

(mmmm ... 40 years later -- the images still make my mouth water!).

 

Nostalgia is always sweeter than direct experience

Memories = merely personalized experiences softened by distance and

time

Clouds often form beautiful shapes and designs

Such that Shamans begin to see real probabilities of futures in those

But like the clouds, and the imageries they form,

Reality too may reshape itself ...

And if it does not, our perception of IT shall!!

 

<reposted after two months so I guess I will not be spanked by some

self-appointed watchman of the terrain!>

, rishi shukla

<rishi_2000in wrote:

>

> It is your data which is being sought by Kumarji!

> (jest)

> rishi

>

> --- Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> > Dear Kumar ji,

> >

> > I hear you!

> >

> > What makes you believe that some of the data already

> > floated around

> > on internet is real?

> >

> > I am offering individuals an alternative, those who

> > do not feel

> > comfortable about full and mindless disclosure,

> > particularly of data

> > that may have acquired from commercial databases.

> > Challenging those

> > individuals may not be the best way to make them

> > cough up such data!

> >

> > As for birthdata not available readily or at all,

> > for a variety of

> > reasons -- there is always prashna and KP system ;-)

> >

> > RR

> >

> >

> > , Prashant

> > Kumar G B

> > <gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear RRji

> > > i had said members post charts with detaisl and

> > not chart data to

> > keep privacy in mind

> > > and this way avoid any usless activity

> > >

> > > I had said as always we can give birth data as we

> > can't say the

> > data we r ginvg is known to all of other members who

> > x,y, z. It is

> > impossible for anyone to say for sure we have

> > breached any clients

> > privacy as we have so many births every day in any

> > part of the world

> > and in any hospital same time too there are births

> > taking place no

> > loss of trust is implied if we post data without any

> > address, tel no

> > work place info which none will do anyway.

> > >

> > > for that matter we dont know ur birthdta as yet

> > can guess from ur

> > postings may be born around 1946-49 range max.

> > [jest].

> > >

> > > so we can post Latd long for places with time

> > zones avoid place

> > names DOB, POB, soe events in life of a case

> > tostudy, cite etc.

> > > and still be doing a good job in astrology and

> > also client privacy.

> > >

> > >

> > > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@>

> > wrote: I am not

> > sure if I understand

> > the meaning or intent of your posted

> > > message fully, Kumarji

> > >

> > > <sigh>

> > >

> > > RR

> > >

> > > , Prashant

> > Kumar G B

> > > <gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear RRji

> > > >

> > > > I have preferred to post birth data wherever

> > possible and HAVE

> > > NEVER given any ones names so it must be the

> > right way forward, as

> > no

> > > one else knows anyone here and in a country like

> > ours where there

> > isa

> > > birth every 12 seconds or so why must anyone feel

> > we r letting

> > them

> > > down, we are not giving any contact info of them

> > max some brief

> > info

> > > on them can be anyone.

> > > >

> > > > we have to do it to share knowledge, know how

> > as well and

> > anything

> > > else sure falls Short, and where ever possible we

> > can quote share

> > > some classical ref or modern works related info

> > on any topic/s. as

> > > there are many ways to reach a destination so it

> > is in reading,

> > > predicting a charts course. we can try as many as

> > possible and

> > sure

> > > we must keep away from unknown Aynamsas for the

> > sake of doctoring

> > > events and Link to ayanamsa.

> > > >

> > > > and sure ur experience u can share most topics

> > with a few charts

> > > and lead the way.

> > > >

> > > > Prashant

> > > > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@>

> > > wrote: ... Fed

> > up with the

> > fighting

> > > and other distractive activities!

> > > > I find that there is quite a bit of distrust

> > and defensiveness

> > > that

> > > > comes to the fore on jyotish forums and other

> > than the over-

> > eager

> > > > reading seekers (not a criticism -- please

> > don't react

> > violently!)

> > > I

> > > > find that we often not share a lot of charts

> > and birthdata.

> > There

> > > is

> > > > understandably some ownership/territorial

> > issues there and

> > > sometimes

> > > > copyright issues get in the way. I have no

> > solution for the

> > > latter,

> > > > but given the premise that if we post the

> > rashi positions of

> > > > illustrative cases, one would then be able to

> > get the:

> > > > Rashi

> > > > Padas

> > > > If possible indicate the charakarakattwa

> > > > Ashtavarga

> > > >

> > > > Surely that is a powerful package and enough

> > information to

> > > > meaningfully discuss jyotish? Yes the purists

> > will mumble and

> > > grumble

> > > > that the vargas and nakshatras are not there

> > and the dashas etc

> > > too.

> > > >

> > > > One caveat and request though for those who

> > wish to follow this

> > > > suggestion of mine:

> > > >

> > > > Please do not include charts where a planet is

> > within the first

> > or

> > > > last 2-3 degrees of a sign. The reason is

> > obvious. We do not

> > want

> > > > people who use other ayanamshas (not the

> > extreme ayanamshas!)

> > than

> > > > what we do (Raman/Lahiri and close ones) to go

> > off on a wild

> > goose

> > > > chase by their standards.

> > > >

> > > > And if possible, let us drop this gyani,

> > expert, teacher

> > > perspective

> > > > that some of us come down at others with. If

> > we were any of

> > those,

> > > we

> > > > would not have to constantly justify and

> > explain and indicate

> > that

> > > we

> > > > are so!

> > > >

> > > > Let us just express our souls, our hearts, our

> > learnings and

> > let

> > > the

> > > > others figure out what our worth is.

> > > >

> > > > RR

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> >

> === message truncated ===

>

>

>

>

>

________

______________

> Want to start your own business?

> Learn how on Small Business.

> http://smallbusiness./r-index

>

 

 

 

 

Prashantkumar G B

-*- The services of this astrologer are free on group but

off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or phone.

Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

Personal ID astro.prashantkumar

09840051861

 

 

 

 

 

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.