Hitler was a social darwinist

[Guest guest]

> Prof Richard Weikart, again, as horrified by student views on the moral

> neutrality of Hitler:

>

> A number of years ago two intelligent students surprised me in a class

> discussion by defending the proposition that Hitler was neither good nor

> evil. Though I kept my composure, I was horrified. One of the worst mass

> murderers in history wasn't evil? How could they believe this? How could

> they justify such a view?

 

Actually this is an uninformed view. Hitler was a mere pussycat compared to

persons like Stalin, and what to speak of the Spanish and Portugese

genocides in South America or muslim mass murders of Hindus, Sikhs and

Christians in India. I just saw a site on the web according to which none of

the celebrated mass murders of history come even close to the crimes muslims

perpetrated in India. Have a look.

 

http://www.mantra.com/holocaust/

 

> They did it by appealing to Darwinism.

>

> More: http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-did-hitler-believe-

> about.html

 

Sick people will use any excuse to exploit their fellow men, whether it be

Darwin, Allah, Jesus or whatever. The Dutch and the British mass murdered

people in Africa in the name of Jesus.

 

Ys, jdd