Guest guest Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 Dear Advaitins : How 'time' appropriate that Shriman Sunder-ji should upload the Creation hymn ( Nasadiya Suktham ) from Rig Veda Espeacially now when there is a discussion going on Re: The Theory of Evolution and the Vedic perspective of Creation in this group ! i had also referenced this hymn while discussing Pierre Teilhard de Chardin ( post 34062) ! But of all the translations available (Ralph Griffith, Wendy Donnigar , Raimond Pannikar etc - Pannikar's is the best ! Thanx Sunder-ji for posting this ! What is so special about this hymn ? Yes ! It traces the 'origin' of Creation - But what was there before the creation ? Nothing ; absolutely nothing ! There was total emptiness ! No being ; no non being ; no air , no sky ! Darkness ! Total Darkness ! then there was Light! We are now arguing about Darvin's theory of evolution and its relevance ? but from this Suktham it is clear that everything was a mystery - it was a mystery then , it is a mystery now! Pl read these powerful lines of the hymn : Who really knows? Who can presume to tell it? Whence was it born? Whence issued this creation? Even the Gods came after its emergence. Then who can tell from whence it came to ? As THE GREAT astronomer Scientist Carl Sagan so eloquently stated " We are the product of 4.5 billion years of fortuitous, slow biological evolution. There is no reason to think that the evolutionary process has stopped. Man is a transitional animal. He is not the climax of creation." DO WE REALLY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED ? WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE ? "That One being, breathless, breathed by its own nature: apart from it there was nothing else. " Ken Knight , a very learned member of this forum, who presented a brilliant series on 'mAyA in the Rig Veda' last Summer ! always used to end his posts with this refrain "`From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.'' - i always cherish those lines for that expains the mystery of creation ! Out of one Breath , many breaths came! i would request Subbuji and other members who are well versed in Vedas to give the 'esoteric; meaning of this great Suktham - so far i have only studied the literal translations! Meanwhile read these lines from Swami Krishnananda of the Divine life society : " This great declaration in the Nasadiya Sukta of the Rig Veda may be compared with the big bang theory of the modern physicists. There was one indescribable point, the nucleus of the would-be expanding universe. That nucleus was not in space and not in time, because space and time had not been created yet. It was a bindu, as Tantra Sastra will tell us. It is a point, but it is not a geometrical point which requires a space in order to locate itself. This is a point, neither conceivable logically, nor describable geometrically; that is why in an enigmatic manner philosophers tell us it is a centre which is everywhere, with circumference nowhere. It is as if this centre of a circle has become the circumference itself, and the whole circle is centre only. Geometrically, from the Euclidian point of view, we cannot imagine such a kind of circle. How could the periphery, the circumference, also become the centre? Therefore, this centre which is the pre-big bang condition is as indescribable and enigmatic as the dark potential of the would-be creative process presented before us by the Nasadiya Sukta of the Rig Veda in the tenth book. " http://www.swami-krishnananda.org/conscious/consc_2.html Swamiji is offering an interestive perspective on the development of Relgious Cosnciousness ! PLEASE READ THIS : The Nasadiya Sukta- "The Supreme Being is both the Unmanifest and the Manifest, Existence as well as Non-existence, the Supreme Indeterminable. " The Purusha-Sukta -"All this Universe is God as the Supreme Person,— the Purusha, with thousands of heads, thousands of eyes, thousands of limbs in His Cosmic Body. He envelops the whole cosmos and transcends it to infinity. " The Narayana-Sukta - " whatever is anywhere, visible or invisible, all this is pervaded by Narayana, within and without. " The Hiranyagarbha-Sukta of the Rig-Veda -" God manifested Himself in the beginning as the Creator of the Universe, encompassing all things, including everything within Himself, the collective totality, as it were, of the whole of creation, animating it as the Supreme Intelligence." The Satarudriya or Rudra-Adhyaya of the Yajur-Veda-"All things, the high and the low, the moving and the unmoving, the good and the bad, the beautiful and the ugly, nay, every conceivable thing, with the all-pervading Siva, or Rudra, as the Supreme God. " Please read this article on what the upanishads have to say about the Supreme Reality --- VERY INTERESTING COMPLILATION ! ! http://home.comcast.net/~surfings/Cogitation/God_Creation.htm How much more simpler it is to think Vasudevam Sarvam Iti !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2006 Report Share Posted November 28, 2006 Dear Saraswati-ji, As I am sure you know, the Divine in many traditions has been described as 'the Circle whose centre is everywhere and circumference is nowhere.' Is this not the immanent and transcendent aspects of the Self / Brahman? In one sense it is in the Hearts of All. In another sense it is that which is beyond everything - the timeless limit-less Existence. Regards, Peter ================ <snip> Meanwhile read these lines from Swami Krishnananda of the Divine life society : " This great declaration in the Nasadiya Sukta of the Rig Veda may be compared with the big bang theory of the modern physicists. There was one indescribable point, the nucleus of the would-be expanding universe. That nucleus was not in space and not in time, because space and time had not been created yet. It was a bindu, as Tantra Sastra will tell us. It is a point, but it is not a geometrical point which requires a space in order to locate itself. This is a point, neither conceivable logically, nor describable geometrically; that is why in an enigmatic manner philosophers tell us it is a centre which is everywhere, with circumference nowhere. It is as if this centre of a circle has become the circumference itself, and the whole circle is centre only. Geometrically, from the Euclidian point of view, we cannot imagine such a kind of circle. How could the periphery, the circumference, also become the centre? Therefore, this centre which is the pre-big bang condition is as indescribable and enigmatic as the dark potential of the would-be creative process presented before us by the Nasadiya Sukta of the Rig Veda in the tenth book. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2006 Report Share Posted November 29, 2006 Peter-ji writes : (As I am sure you know, the Divine in many traditions has been described as 'the Circle whose centre is everywhere and circumference is nowhere.' ) i am delighted you picked on this right away , Peter-ji! I guess we really do not know who this statement is really attributed to ( may be our Ananda-ji can throw light on the origins of this powerful statement ) but i have read on the net it was "Voltaire who must have gotten it from St.Augustine, and Augustine got it from neplatonism. Moscato, a sixteenth century Italian kabbalist, also quotes this sentence in his "The Divine Circle", and attributes it to Hermes Trismegistus ("the Egyptian wise man"). I cannot now find the actual first source, but it must be something middle or neoplatonic or hermetic" - i have seen this quoted in jungian circles too ( no pun intended) ! This was a favorite quote of Swami Vivekananda also! As a worshippper of the 'divine feminine' i also believe in a circle - can Goddess be ever confined ? She has no begginning and no end just like a circle - She is Adi and she is Anadi Shakti ! ! As The Svetasvatara Upanishad says, "Thou art without beginning and beyond all time and space" Sri Mahavishnu is 'anaadi-nidhanah' -the One without beginning and without end ! YES! you are right . Peter- ji , ( He is in the hearts of all !! In another sense it is that which is > beyond everything - the timeless limit-less Existence.) Beautiful sentiments! Thanks ! Om Namo Narayana! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2006 Report Share Posted November 29, 2006 ShrIgurubhyo namaH Namaste, Is there a translation of the Sayanacharya's commentary on the NAsadIya Suktam? Even if the original is available, the text may pl. be provided here. The following was culled from some website: The Nasadiya sukta For a Western scientist like Brian Greene, the answer may appear to be ridicules but the Indian seers since time immemorial have echoed it as ananta i. e. infinite. This universe which is material manifestation of the Brahman, who is an infinite being. RIGVEDIC MODEL OF CREATION: nAsadIya sUkta (RV 10.129) A few years ago, well-known cosmologist, Steven Weinberg wrote an excellent book, "The First Three Minutes"(7). It gave the lucid account of the events that must have occurred in the first three minutes of the BIG BANG when the matter and space came into existence from the primordial soup in the state of singularity. This state of singularity was marked by the nature of the point existence with its mass, density and energy being infinite. On the very similar lines there is a Rigvedic hymn that elaborates the phenomenon of creation. The hymn title is nAsadIya sUkta (RV 10.129.1-7). The description in the hymn runs almost parallel with the BIG BANG description step by step. Modern science is yet to delve in the state of existence before BIG BANG. However the first two stanzas of the hymn describe the state of primordial existence. According to the nAsadIya sUkta: 1. In the beginning there existed a state beyond description or definition. It was neither sat, i.e., existence marked by name and form, neither asat i.e. not existing. 2. There did neither exist the time nor space. 3. There was none to be enveloped nor enveloping entity. 4. There was neither death nor deathlessness. 5. There was neither day nor night. 6. The primordial existence breathed within itself, by its own law. 7. There was nothing beyond itself. Above points are dealt in the first 2 stanzas of the hymn. Here the vedic seer has gone a step ahead of the modern science. He states that the primordial existence was breathing within itself. What does it mean? Did it vibrate within itself, possibly within dimensions that measured less than the Plank length of 10-33 cm and before an event of less than Plank time of 10-43 sec under the Plank tension of 1039 tons. Modern cosmology is still grappling with the problem of nature of primordial existence or phenomenon at the core of the black hole. Once the black hole core nature is understood the primordial existence could possibly be extrapolated. According to the string theory, it needs additional dimensions beyond the four dimensional existence of the relativistic universe to define the quantum primordial singularity. When the BIGBANG occurred: 8. There was darkness hidden by darkness. This refers it the dark matter of neutrinoes that the modern cosmologists predict. 9. Vibrations (salilam) were concealed within. 10. It came into being instantaneously. 11. It came into being out of enormous heat (tapas tat mahinA). 12. It came into being from the state of indefinable existence in to defined state. 13. Light stretched out criss-crossing the whole existence. 14. There were impregnators the seeding materials that led to the formation of sat with name and form. 15. A cord extended that connected the ends together. 16. There were mighty forces that came into being. 17. It was covered with emptiness. 18. There was impulse beneath. 19. There was giving forth (output) above. 20. It came into being out of the desire that germinated the whole program of creation (kAmastadagre samavartatAdhi). Above points are derived from the comments made by a) Windy Doniger O' Flaherty(8) b) V. Madhusudan Reddy(9) c) Pt. Sitaramashastri Kurundkar, my revered Guru(10) The perception of the ultimate truth leading to the unique phenomenon of creation of universe could not be expressed without giving analogies. The vedic seer gave the analogy of unfathomable depths of water - gahanam gabhIram – while expressing the primordial state of matter. In order to clarify that there existed no time, the statement made is - na rAtryA anha AsIt i.e. there existed neither night nor day. The primordial turbulance is described as salilam. The `Nasadiya Sukta' is perhaps the most scientific description of the ultimate Reality as well as of the projection of the phenomenal world. It makes the relative and the Absolute, nature and Spirit, the twin aspects of that one Reality and shows that men of wisdom (kavayah), who had controlled their senses, found out the ultimate cause of this world (which appears to be real) in their own hearts (hridi) through concentrated intellects (manisha). Pranams to all, subbu Om Tat Sat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2006 Report Share Posted November 29, 2006 advaitin, "subrahmanian_v" <subrahmanian_v wrote: > > ShrIgurubhyo namaH > Namaste, > > Is there a translation of the Sayanacharya's commentary on the > NAsadIya Suktam? Even if the original is available, the text may pl. > be provided here. The sanskrit original is at: http://tinyurl.com/y26pkz pp. 178-192 Title Sayana's commentary on The Rigveda Author1 Pashupati Nath Shastri Author2 Subject Sanskrit literature Language sanskrit Barcode 1990010087956 Year 1921 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2006 Report Share Posted November 29, 2006 advaitin, "advaitins" <advaitins wrote: > The sanskrit original is at: > > http://tinyurl.com/y26pkz pp. 178-192 > > > > Title Sayana's commentary on The Rigveda > Author1 Pashupati Nath Shastri > Author2 > Subject Sanskrit literature > Language sanskrit > Barcode 1990010087956 > Year 1921 > Namaste, Many thanks for the link. It will take some time to read it fully and assimilate the purport. The Commentator has cited many PANini sUtras in the course of the commentary. The commentary is Advaitic in nature. Regards, subbu Om Tat Sat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.