Budh - Adhithya Yoga - to the Group ???

[Guest guest]

We await a rewritten, spell-corrected version of this posting, before

we comment on it -- should the author feel up to reposting a more

refined and more intelligible version of the said message, under

current consideration.

 

Thanks --

 

Yours in Jyotish as always and ever --

 

Ranjan/Rohiniranjan/Crystal Pages

 

vedic astrology, sairam nat <sairaman53

wrote:

>

> FROM SAIRAMAN ; CHENNAI 30 11 2006 ; REPLY REG GURU ETC.

>

> As it is rightly said in the modeern tech. age old gurus wityh

devotion to God and perfect personal life seems not availbe.

>

> Age of net and group discussion.

>

> All professionals and earning a living on the astro charging very

without any committment to what they say even after the expensive

pariharams.

>

> It is very difficult to get and extract things from a Guru in the

the computerfast food agwe.

>

> All combinations, slokas of sanskrit , konas angles, 1,5,9 theory

lagna strong purva punya strong do not work practically seems writeen

in veda period thousands yearas back.

>

> Most of the astrolgers and professionals write book by doing

postmartems of vips and justify the combinations.

>

> Nobody imagined computer, ambanis, bill gates rajnikanth etc some

25 to 30 years and IF 12TH HOUSE OCCUPIED BY BAD PLANETS IN

TWENTIFIVE YRS BACK WE MAY SAY HE WILL GO TO JAIL. Today they are

going toforeign countries.

>

> THE AGE IS FOR SATURN HARD WORK DURING NIGHT.

> MARS FOR BOLDNESS SEE THE LADIES GOING ASLONG TO FOREIGN

COUNTRIES LIVE BOLDLY SEPARATRELT.

> RAGHU THE MILECHA IS CONNECTED IN EVERY FAMILY.

> THE FOREIGN MONEY THROUGH RAGHU KETHU AND WESTERN AND MUSLIM

COUNTRIES IS GIVING LIVELIHOOD FOR ALL ASIANS.

> Some 30 years back ladies going to foreign countries cannot be

imagined.

>

>

> There seemsno clear cut rules for thease things in traiditional

astro.

>

> We have to reedit and matchto modern days.

>

> People with dharma Jupiter, strong invariably suffer much

financially.

>

> 6 8 12 bhavas strong added to 2 and 4 th house.

>

> Pople born between 1979 to 1982 with Mars, raghu andjupiter very

close earn in lakhs pm and go toforeign countries and invariably

their married life seems with problems.

>

> People main concept of life has changed basically education, mnc

employment foreign trips, house for 30 lakhs, cars etc no respect to

elders avaloding or postponing marriage and all the more the issue of

children is a very big commitment people prefer to avoid since very

trouble some toconcentrate on job.

>

> See the 5house which 12to 6 and 8 of 10. If we go to cinema waste

4 hrs enjoy wityh childredn and wife we cannot built up our carrier.

>

> Instead if we have many official friends both male and female

freely we can maintain relationship outside home avoiding relatives

we feel very happy.

>

> Many hor. 2 to 3 planets ucha, jupiter aspect, in kona and angle

suffer very much in life. Where gthere is link with Moon raghu,

saturn, Mars work very well adapting to modern times.

>

> I am sorry for theabove personal purely expressions as I see from

sdifferent horoscopes.

>

> See the puranas also Lord Rama suffered much from childhood had big

challenges in professional and family life, where as Ravana suffered

only for last 10 days in battle.

>

> Pandavas suffered for long Duruyodhana suffered only for 18 days

stillsuch time he enjoyed all comforts in life.

>

> Even in cinemas villain and Mars Raghu enjoys life till the last

frames the heros having tough time ansd challenges through the 3 hrs.

>

> SAIRAMAN ; CHENNAI; 30 11 2006 7 AM

>

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

wrote: Perhaps the truth lies

somewhere between the myth and the ancient

> tale.

>

> RR

>

> vedic astrology, Agnyeya <agnyeya@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Rohiniranjanji,

> >

> > Positive words are always an encouragement. Many Thanks for

the

> same and for the wishes.

> >

> > While I completely agree on the aspect of having/not having a

> Guru, I believe one who does have a mentor/guide is truly a

blessed

> one. And yet there will be students who excel even in the absence

of

> one. (EkLavya, is a great example.)

> >

> > Humble Regards,

> > Hemant Desai

> >

> >

> >

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@> wrote:

> > Hemant ji,

> >

> > I find your gentle and reconcilliatory style admirable! One

point

> to

> > note -- having a guru or waiting for a guru is not essential for

> > learning and practicing astrology usefully. Some individuals who

> like

> > to do some independent thinking may actually find many of the

gurus

> > and teachers restrictive. On the other hand, many who would like

a

> > bit more of hand-holding and could benefit from the structure

and

> > discipline imposed by an external teacher may prefer that mode

more

> > usefully.

> >

> > Please continue to study, and ask questions and offer opinions.

On

> a

> > public forum where discussion is promoted, despite some strong

> > opinions and occasional chiding from elders (age or experience

or

> > knowledge) your gentle sincerity is what will take you further.

> >

> > Best of luck :-)

> >

> > Rohiniranjan

> >

> > vedic astrology, Agnyeya <agnyeya@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear All (except Shri Vrajleelaji),

> > >

> > > Most humble apologies for taking the tone as below and request

> > you to look at my reasons for the same.

> > >

> > > # Most, if not all, my posts mention I am a student and

request

> > verification from seniors.

> > > # Shri Vrajleelaji should appreciate that many individuals

here

> > are without a guru/guide and instead of chiding them, an offer

to

> > become a mentor would be greatly appreciated and I am sure many

> will

> > take that offer up.

> > > # Derogatory tones in discussion forums should be avoided.

> > Insulting anyone does not help in an individuals learning. It

only

> > fosters resentment.

> > >

> > > Again, my apologies, for I know I have a long way to go.

> > >

> > > Humble Regards,

> > > Hemant Desai

> > >

> > >

> > > Agnyeya <agnyeya@> wrote:

> > > Dear Vrajleelaji,

> > >

> > > 1. Request you to see the follow up post.

> > > 2. Am sure that you are NOT a guru and are a long way from

being

> > one.

> > >

> > > May your journey towards knowledge be less eventful and your

> > humility about your knowledge be greater.

> > >

> > > Most Humble Regards,

> > > Hemant Desai

> > >

> > >

> > > vrajleela <vrajleela@> wrote:

> > > vedic astrology, "astro_kid_1"

<agnyeya@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >Dear members

> > > I am reproducing my earlier post in this regard for the

benefit

> of

> > > readers

> > > May I know what made you to come to such conclusions regarding

> > Budha-

> > > aditya yoga as your answers do not stand to the rules

mentioned

> in

> > > Hindu Astronomy and Astrology. I feel that these are basics

that

> > > many students like you must know before coming to conclusion

> based

> > > on own thoughts.

> > > The rules for find any union of planets called yuti or yoga

are:

> > > 1)When the longitude of the swift-moving planet is greater

than

> > that

> > > of the slow one, the conjunction (samyoga) is past; otherwise,

it

> > is

> > > to come; this is the case when the two are moving eastward

i.e.,

> > > clockwise; if, however, they are retrograding (vakrin), the

> > contrary

> > > is true

> > > 2)When the longitude of the one moving eastward is greater,

the

> > > conjunction (samagama)is past; but when that of the one that

is

> > > retrograding is greater, it is to come.

> > > 3)When the distance between the two planets is < or = 12

degrees

> > > then the question of yoga arises otherwise not

> > > Given these conditions, can you identify

> > > 1)faster and slower planets

> > > 2)Reassess your statement "budha-adhitya yoga occurs if budha

is

> > not

> > > combust" in light of these rules

> > > 3)Can you tell the reason for specific degrees i.e., why 12 is

> only

> > > alloted for occurence of any yoga

> > > I have a very feeble hope that you can answer these questions

and

> > > also suggest you to verify your budha-aditya yoga if present.

> > > I feel strongly that you should first check your basics of

Hindu

> > > Astronomy and later Astrology and it is not as easy as "read

and

> > > throw" attitude

> > > Hope you got the point

> > > Jairadhe

> > >

> > > > Dear All,

> > > >

> > > > Let me rephrase that to say that while other planets lose

their

> > > > ability of benefic results while associated with Su, the

same

> > > cannot

> > > > be said of Me.

> > > >

> > > > Humble Regards,

> > > > Hemant Desai

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "ashwin_062k"

> > > > <ashwin_062k@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Hemant

> > > > >

> > > > > Could you please provide with the

astrological/astronomical

> > > reason

> > > > > for budh not get combust with surya.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Sridhar

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, Agnyeya <agnyeya@>

> > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Sridhar,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > For the Budh-Aditya yoga to fructify the distance

between

> > > the

> > > > 2

> > > > > must be atleast 10 degrees.

> > > > > > Also Budh is the only planet which due to its motion is

> > > always

> > > > > very near to Surya, hence normally there may be many

charts

> > > where

> > > > > you see Budh in 12th or in 2nd from Su.

> > > > > > Also Budh is one planet which does not get combust with

Su.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Gurus, please verify.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > || Om Krishna Guru ||

> > > > > > Humble Regards,

> > > > > > Hemant Desai

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ashwin_062k <ashwin_062k@> wrote:

> > > > > > Dear Gurujans

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Correction : The distance between surya and budh is 2deg

27

> > > mts

> > > > > > and not 1 deg 8 mts as given below.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sorry for the inconvenience

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards

> > > > > > Sridhar

> > > > > > vedic astrology, "ashwin_062k"

> > > > > > <ashwin_062k@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Gurujans

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I understand that when surya and budh together in a

bhava

> > or

> > > > in

> > > > > > > mutual 7ths, forms "budha-adhithya" yoga.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I also read that combustion occurs when any planet in

a

> > > direct

> > > > > > > motion passes the surya from behind at certain

degrees,

> > > except

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > sukr who gets combust in "retograde" motion and rahu,

> ketu

> > > > > doesn't

> > > > > > > get combust rather eclipse the surya.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > My query: I have a chart in which the distance between

> > surya

> > > > and

> > > > > > > budha is 1 deg 8 mts. I presume here, the Budh is

getting

> > > > > combust

> > > > > > > and is inactive or unable to perform. In this case,

still

> > > this

> > > > > > Yoga

> > > > > > > is formed !! or am i missing some basic principle here.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Would apprecaite if you could enlighten me.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards

> > > > > > > Sridhar

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Agnyeya@ Planet Earth

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on - Answers

> > > India

> > > > > > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from

Messenger

> > > > > Version 8. Get it NOW

> > > > > >

> > > > > >