Aurangzeb's chart....is it extraordinary?

[Guest guest]

Dear Pandits,

 

The following are Emperor Aurangzeb's birth charts. Nov.3, 1618,13.59

(5.08east)77e12 28n36.

 

As far as my limited knowledge goes, he seems to have gajakesari,

bhadra and neechabhanga raja yogas. all of them exceptional yogas, I

reckon. But sun and mars are debilitated.

 

What are the factors that made him a great king? is it GY, which is

supposed to give leadership qualities? He is supposed to be the

greatest king to have ruled India, perhaps the only king to have

conquered the whole of India. Others like maurya were restricted to

certain regions. But Aurangzeb conquered whole India quite easily, and

also ruled it for many, many years, suppressing revolts and winning

battles with relative ease.

 

Ketu in 5 and rahu 12, was that why he was extremely religious?

 

All this is rather exceptional, so I hope learned members can throw

some light on what made him a great king and religious at the same

time. Because that's a rare combination. Not all kings are spiritual

and not all spiritual people are wealthy.

 

Regards,

Suresh

[Guest guest]

Hello,

He sure was a successful king in many ways as we define success in wordly ways and from his perspective. Greatness is another thing. He was cruel, killed his three (?) brothers including the legit heir Dara Shikoh, the great art patron, to ascend throne. He imposed a tax called Zazia. It had to be paid by all those who pursued the Hindu religion, in the land of Hindus itself!! So he was not 'religious' but a fanatic muslim who encouraged/coerced conversion to Islam through his policies.

Even by wordly standards, he had a very hard time holding on to Deccan where Marathas and others kept challenging him and eventually broke free of Mughal empire. In these Deccan battle all the looted wealth by Mughals was drained and later lead to its falling apart and becoming three or four major regional powers instead of one central empire. Perhaps the word great can be used more appropriately for Akbar if one insists on it.

But then we call all those who killed great. That includes Askoka, Alexandar, Napolean etc. You kill just one, you go to jail. You kill some more, you become a political leader. You kill masses, you become a king!!

But the guy did obviously have some leadership skills. For those who have access to Netflix check you a title ' Mugals: warriors of India' or something like that. It's in english and has some terrific info on the technology of the time.

cheers

Shiva

 

 

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

[Guest guest]

Shiva ji,

 

I should have read your posted response before I posted mine just

now :-)

 

You covered all facts but this zazia sounds so similar to the

discriminating ruling in South Africa where indians had to carry ID

papers and had to be fingerprinted. The very thing that became

Gandhiji's first 'project' and led to the exit of British Rule from

India.

 

How soon we forget history and the revival of Nazi-thinking in

different shapes and forms is another spine-chilling reminder of why

mankind should do global worship of moon (memory), mercury(buddhi)

and jupiter (wisdom) on a regular basis!!

 

LORD SAVE US!!

 

 

RR

 

 

, Azaad <theblisswithin

wrote:

>

> Hello,

>

> He sure was a successful king in many ways as we define success

in wordly ways and from his perspective. Greatness is another thing.

He was cruel, killed his three (?) brothers including the legit heir

Dara Shikoh, the great art patron, to ascend throne. He imposed a

tax called Zazia. It had to be paid by all those who pursued the

Hindu religion, in the land of Hindus itself!! So he was

not 'religious' but a fanatic muslim who encouraged/coerced

conversion to Islam through his policies.

>

> Even by wordly standards, he had a very hard time holding on to

Deccan where Marathas and others kept challenging him and eventually

broke free of Mughal empire. In these Deccan battle all the looted

wealth by Mughals was drained and later lead to its falling apart

and becoming three or four major regional powers instead of one

central empire. Perhaps the word great can be used more

appropriately for Akbar if one insists on it.

> But then we call all those who killed great. That includes

Askoka, Alexandar, Napolean etc. You kill just one, you go to jail.

You kill some more, you become a political leader. You kill masses,

you become a king!!

> But the guy did obviously have some leadership skills. For those

who have access to Netflix check you a title ' Mugals: warriors of

India' or something like that. It's in english and has some terrific

info on the technology of the time.

> cheers

> Shiva

>

>

>

> Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

>

>