Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> Your confusion is now so deep and all-encompassing I think we need to go

> back to baby steps.

 

Whether I am confused or not is not relevant. You just have to back up all

your statements by quotes. Just that. So far you have not done that.

 

"The process of speaking in spiritual circles is to say something upheld by

the scriptures. One should at once quote from scriptural authority to back

up what he is saying." (Bg 17.15 purport)

 

"Therefore you must confirm by quotes every statement that you make.

Otherwise it is rascaldom." (Yaduraja, Oct 16, 2006)

 

I have no objection to do baby steps, if you need that.

 

 

> You ask yet again:

 

I asked it again to show that you are unable to answer such questions, and

therefore you don't know what you are talking about.

 

"Just see how rascaldom. You do not know something perfectly, and still, you

are talking about it." (Lecture, Bg 1.45-46, Aug 1, 1973)

 

 

> > why did Srila Prabhupada go to New York and other cities to initiate and

> > deliver disciples?

 

Please do not quote my statements out of context. The entire question was:

 

Do you claim that for initiation and delivery 'we do not need Srila

Prabhupada's physical presence'? If yes, then why did Srila Prabhupada go to

New York and other cities to initiate and deliver disciples?

 

 

> Do you accept that Srila Prabhupada was not physically present at many

> initiation ceremonies?

 

Yes. He was not physically present at many initiation ceremonies. And by

"physically present" I mean "within a distance of 10 meters or so from the

sacrificial fire".

 

You see, unlike you, I can immediately answer your questions and I have the

decency to do so. And I can explain what I mean by "physically present".

 

But as I also already wrote many times, you should not base your arguments

on what I accept or not.

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa