what do you think about this'

[Guest guest]

23, 2006 12:46 AM

read this

 

 

http://uk.blog.360./blog-eHy63vs1aadUxB3qEEJmAKpmMUKW8Q--?cq=1&p=80

[Guest guest]

??? ??? ??????

 

Dear Paulo, Namaskar

This was my reply to the persons post:

 

--

Dear Sir,

In comment to your post on the atomic clock i must inform you in the

usage of time as far as astrologers are concerned.

The time given in hospital or in birth records are far from flawless as

far as the actual birthtime is concerned, hence, astrologers keep this

in mind when they perform their readings. Infact most professional

astrologers (that i know of) initiate the consultation by rectifying the

chart based on given events.

Reading from the shastras on this we find rectification techniques which

allow for a birthtime error of only 24 seconds in time (1 vighatika).

This, and the interpolation of many other rectification techniques

available, do result in a very accurate birthtime for the native AFTER

rectification.

So the invention of the atomic clock does not change the methods of

practice for astrologers, as infact the error does not lie with the

watches available but the person who records the birthtime... in other

words a human error.

I hope this comment is helpful to you in your understanding of time and

astrology.

Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen

http://srigaruda.com

-------------------

 

Yours sincerely,

 

--

Visti Larsen

email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>

For consultations and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>

 

 

paulo mendes wrote:

>

>

> 23, 2006 12:46 AM

> *Subject:* read this

>

> http://uk.blog. 360.. com/blog- eHy63vs1aadUxB3q EEJmAKpmMUKW8Q-

> -?cq=1&p=80

> <http://uk.blog.360./blog-eHy63vs1aadUxB3qEEJmAKpmMUKW8Q--?cq=1&p=80>

>

>