Guest guest Posted January 25, 2007 Report Share Posted January 25, 2007 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > So are you saying you don’t know if I’m right or wrong? No. > What do your ‘senior devotee’ advisers say? I will tell you after they told me. By these questions you are just trying distract from the fact that you speculated. > And yet this was the first piece of evidence you had put forward to prove > your injunction which, in its most recent incarnation, reads: You misunderstood my argument. Didn't you notice that it is a reductio ad absurdum where the quotes are not direct evidence? > Once you either concede you have not proved your injunction, or prove it > with RELEVANT evidence, we can proceed. This is your option 1, but I chose option 2. You have not yet finished it. If you are unable to do it, please tell me, and I will offer you option 3. > On the basis of visible evidence (which is the ONLY evidence allowed > within the rules of this debate) there was no authority for the GBC to > change the status quo you agree Srila Prabhupada established way back in > 1966. Your argument is incomplete. It does not prove your point c). To complete it you would have to present some visible evidence that the GBC has not seen the order, and that no-one else has seen the order either. > P.S. with regards <For example by proving that an initiated devotee does > not have to be initated again in the next life.> I have already refuted > this point. You cannot refute a point just by saying that you have refuted it. Do you claim that an initiated devotee does not have to be initated again in the next life? ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.