Guest guest Posted January 26, 2007 Report Share Posted January 26, 2007 ShrIgurubhyo namaH The Grand Scheme of Bhagavan Veda VyAsa Namaste, In this post an endeavour is made to address some questions that recently came up for discussion. One is: How is Shakti, the Universal Mother, called avidya? What comes to mind immediately is this nAma of the Mother in the Sri Lalitha SahasranAma: vidyA-avidyA-svarUpiNi. She is both vidyA and avidyA. We have already seen the meaning of this in a general way by recalling Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa's words: VidyA mAyA and avidyA maayA and the role of these two, the former takes us towards the Truth and the latter takes us away from the Truth. The daivI sampat (divine qualities) and AsurI sampat (demoniacal traits) are both the manifestations of the One Supreme Being only, through the power of MAyA which itself is made up of the three guNas – sattva, rajas and tamas. We have a clear mention of this in the Bhagavad Gita: Ye chaiva sAttvikA bhAvAH RaajasAs-tAmasAscha ye | Matta Eveti tAn viddhi na tvaham teShu te mayi || (VII.12) Whatever beings are of Sattva or of Rajas or Tamas, know them to proceed from Me; still, I am not in them, they are in Me. While sattva, rajas and tamas are collectively called `Avidya', still, sattva is differentiated as vidya, within the superset of Avidya/MAyaa and rajas and tamas as avidya, within this same superset. In the Lalitha SahasranAma itself, we find the Shakti, the Mother as the one inhering in the regions like MUlAdhAra. svAdhiShThaana, etc. , the lower parts, of the anus, genital, etc. This does not in any way take away or bring down the value and worth or glory of the Supreme Mother, who, in any case, transcends these, untouched by these. This idea is not something alien to the UpaniShads: In the Taittiriya UpaniShad, Bhruguvalli, for instance, we find these upAsanas: A quote, partially, from the book on the Tai.Upanishad by Samata Books: //Now the Shruti proceeds to teach how Brahman should be contemplated: KShema iti Vaachi……vimuktiriti pAyau.. ..prajAtiramRRitamAnanda ityupasthe [As safety in speech,….as discharge in the anus….and joy in the generative organ….]// In the Gita seventh chapter, and in the 10th chapter, the Lord is specifying his Divine VibhUtis meant for contemplation. He does not specifically enumerate the 'lower' ones, although He is also these, of course, by the agency of Prakriti. The idea of pointing out these is just to show that EVERYTHING in creation, the `lowly' and the `exalted' , which categorization includes ignorance, avidyA and knowledge, vidyA, is an expression of the Supreme Brahman, of course, through the agency of mAyA. The ultimate teaching of the UpaniShad/Gitaa is: this multiplicity, diversity, duality, dvandva, is just an appearance; not absolutely real. Hence, O Sadhaka, transcend this duality by knowing the Truth that is Non-dual, bereft of these varieties, untouched by these. The training for this is provided in the scriptures: be equanimous in duality (karma yoga) and finally get to the state where you see the One, NirdOSham, Samam, Brahma in everything that is variegated; for example the Gita verse (V.18): vidyA-vinaya-sampanne BraahmaNe, gavi, hastini, shuni chaiva shvapAke cha paNDitAH samadarshinaH: He is the Knower of the Truth who sees That which is inherent (as the Non-dual Truth) in the outwardly manifest forms of (some examples given): a Brahmin endowed with learning and humility (sAttva), a cow (rajas), an elephant, a dog and an utterly uncultured man of lowly habits (of eating dog's flesh) (all tamas). Here the teaching is: the Supreme Truth, Brahman, is GuNAtIta, beyond the three guNas. Actually, the Gita itself teaches in the 14 chapter the traits of the GuNAtIta. Bhagavaan Veda Vyasa, in His infinite compassion, gave us the PurANas with the objective of taking the people of mediocre caliber to the realization of the Supreme. Since the Truth spoken of in the UpaniShads/Vedas with whatever name, say for example, VishNu, which really means, etymologically, vyApanashIlaH, the all-pervading One, is NirguNa, nirAkAra, AdvitIya Shuddha Chaitanya , is beyond the grasp of the unprepared minds, Sri VyAsa featured this NirguNa Brahman in the various purANas and depicted this Truth, Brahman as sa-guNa Hari, Krishna, Shiva, AmbA, etc. In these purANas, He showed the respective manifestations as the Supreme. Thus, in the Bhagavatam Sri Hari is the Supreme Brahman. In the Shiva purANa, Lord Shiva is the Supreme Brahman, and in the DevI bhAgavatam, BrahmAnDa purANa, etc., the Mother is the Supreme Brahman. Thus, in the Sri LalithA sahasranAma we have names such as: `karAnguli-nakhOtpanna-nArAyaNa-dashAkRRitiH' . This means: the Mother Lalithaambika's ten finger-nails are the source from which the ten incarnations/avatAras of Lord NAraayaNa have emerged. We have, elsewhere a name: Brahma-VishNu-ShivAtmika meaning: She is the essence of the triumvirates: Brahma, ViShNu and Shiva. Again, there is this name of the Mother: sa-chAmara-ramA- vANi-savya-dakShiNa-sevitA meaning: On either side of the Mother LalithA Tripurasundari are present Mothers Lakshmi and Saraswati, serving Her, fanning Her. All this is to only show, in the intention of Bhagavan Veda VyAsa, that the NirguNa Chaitanya Brahman of the UpaniShads alone is the Supreme and the other powers that officiate in various capacities in maintaining the world-order, are Its own manifestations. There is no question of Devi is greater than Vishnu or Shiva is greater than Vishnu. The Advaitic bhAva that One alone appears as the variety of deities is what to be grasped, as conveyed by Veda VyAsa, through the purANas. When this is recognized, there will be no room for fanatic viewpoints of VaishNavism and Shaivism or Shaakta-ism. For those belonging to the Advaita sampradAya, the chanting of the three SahasraNaamas: of Vishnu, Shiva and Lalitha, is equally sweet and agreeable perfectly. In fact there are some who do the chanting of all the three even daily. The Gita verse (XVIII.20) teaches this: sarvabhUteShu yenaikam bhAvam-avyayam-IkShate | avibhaktam vibhakteShu taj-jnAnam viddhi sAttvikam || That by which man sees the one Idestructible Reality in all beings, inseparate in the separated, that knowledge know thou as SAttvic. The Kathopanishad severely criticizes the cognition of duality as real: MRRityOssa MRRityum Apnoti ya iha NAneva pashyati. He who sees difference goes from death to death. In the Nrisimha TApaniya UpaniShat there is this mantra: KRRiShir- bhUvAchakaH shabo, Nastu niRRiti-vAchakaH…. meaning that the word `KRRiShNa' actually means Existence-Consciousness Brahman alone. So too is the name RAma: ramante yogino yatra, nishprapanche chidAtmani, iti Raama-padenAsau parabrahmAbhidhIyate: The word `RAma' signifies that Supreme Brahman, bereft of the world, where the Yogins revel in bliss. To conclude, we have in the scheme of this esoteric wisdom, a graded path that leads the aspirant, from whatever level of spiritual evolution he is in, to the Supreme Non-dual Truth. This scheme makes use of the method of imagery, stories, etc., quite extensively. The various names of deities, their forms and their gradations such as Tamasic, Rajasic and Saatvic deities, are all part of this scheme. The jIva, the sAdhaka, is endowed with the Shakti, manifesting as both aasuric and daivi, in him. The `energy' that is required to eschew the Asuric and strengthen the DaivI is also present in him. The Scriptures are a guide, a `user's manual' as it were, to invoke and appropriately regulate this shakti. With pranams to all, Subbu Om Tat Sat A note for Br. Vinayaka: On 'Kapila' of the Gita: The name: 'MaharShiH KapilAchAryaH' is the 531st name in the Sri ViShNusahasranAma. Acharya Shankara comments: The two words found above are one name only with the adjective. Maharshi is the one who has the knowledge of the entire Veda; the others have just the knowledge of a part of the Veda. Kapila is the One endowed with the knowledge of/and the Acharya of - the sAnkhya (Vedanta, refer: SAnkhya Yoga of the Gitaa) that is the shuddha- tattva-vijnAna. He quotes a ShwetashvatarOpanishat mantra V.2 and a smriti as well. He also quotes the Gita: 10.26. Swami Tyagishananda notes that the Shve.Up. quoted above refers to HiraNyagarbha. In any case the Kapila of the Gita is not the one of the Bhagavata, nor the Teacher of the SAnkhya that is refuted in the Vedanta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.