the quotes are not direct evidence (Ramakanta das) JAI!!!!

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramakanta Prabhu,

PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

> if disciples are indeed delivered back to the spiritual sky at the moment

> of initiation (which I assumed meant the ceremony) then this would result

> in something absurd (puff of smoke).

 

<Did you read that somewhere or is it just your opinion?>

 

Oops, you missed out the next sentence I wrote:

 

“And then at your prompting I adjusted my example to make it more accurate

(dropping dead).”

 

> The ball is now in your court.

 

<I see no reason to repeat my argument. And on Jan 25, 2007 I already wrote

that my argument is a reductio ad absurdum where the quotes are not direct

evidence.>

 

You only conceded the letter to JPS was not direct evidence. If you are now

conceding that none of your evidence directly proves your injunction then this

matches my position. Your so-called reductio absurdum argument was thus based

on evidence that bore no direct relation to the subject within your injunction,

and hence collapsed in its own absurdity. If you promise never again to claim

you proved your injunction prior to this date (8.2.07) I shall move to the next

challenge in the queue.

 

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu

 

 

 

 

 

Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich - CH)

<Ramakanta.HKS (AT) pamho (DOT) net>

Initiations in ISKCON <Initiations.in.ISKCON (AT) pamho (DOT) net>

Thursday, February 8, 2007 7:43:00 AM

Re: still stuck in option 2

 

 

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> if disciples are indeed delivered back to the spiritual sky at the moment

> of initiation (which I assumed meant the ceremony) then this would result

> in something absurd (puff of smoke).

 

Did you read that somewhere or is it just your opinion?

 

 

> The ball is now in your court.

 

I see no reason to repeat my argument. And on Jan 25, 2007 I already wrote

that my argument is a reductio ad absurdum where the quotes are not direct

evidence. Now it's your turn to prove that the quotes are not indirect

evidence either, that there is no contradiction if my statement were true.

Or you could simply confirm my statement that you did not accept my argument

as a proof.

 

 

On Feb 3, 2007 you claimed that Srila Prabhupada can initiate disciples on

this planet without being present (incarnated) on this planet. Please follow

the rules of this debate and prove this claim with relevant evidence.

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa

 

-----------------------

To from this mailing list, send an email to:

Initiations.in.ISKCON-Owner (AT) pamho (DOT) net

 

 

 

_____________________________

_____

Don't pick lemons.

See all the new 2007 cars at Autos.

http://autos./new_cars.html