Guest guest Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 achintya, "anantshenoy2000" <anantshenoy2000 wrote: > > Why don't Tattvavadis acknowledge errors in the writings of their > > acharya? > > Tattvavadis have recognized errors in the writings of those acharyas > of theirs who committed an error - they are open enough to admit that > some statements are incorrect (such as Jayatirtha saying so for > Narahari Tirtha) if reason demands it. BNKS has done it for several > of them. I have yet to see such open-mindedness in Gaudiya tradition. > Meanwhile, on the Tattvavadi e-mail (http://dvaita.info/pipermail/dvaita-list_dvaita.info/2007- February/002583.html) list we have the following posting from one of these open-minded Tattvavadis: "it is important that Madhvas come out with all the information they have on this issue of Brahma Mohana so that this falsehood about Madhva gets a response. It is something often mentioned by gurus in ISKCON - portraying it as a deficiency of Madhva's commentary that Gaudiyas later filled in, since they were not as close-minded as Madhva." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.