Ramakanta breaks the rules of the debate again

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramakanta Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

You wrote once again with regards your inability to prove the GBC were

authorised to change the status you agree Srila Prabhupada established in 1966:

 

<Does the evidence has to be seen by everyone? Or is it sufficient that it

can be seen by qualified persons?

 

You are now once again defeated under the rules of this debate. You must

support your position with statements from Srila Prabhupada within the rules of

this debate. If you want to challenge the status quo (point a) then the burden

of proof is on you, not I. To imply an opponent is not qualified to see such

'proof' is not evidence or proof of any sort; though I admit it’s a great

insult. So congratulations for that at least. It's a shame since I was looking

forwarded to smashing all your other challenges.

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu

 

 

 

 

 

Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich - CH)

<Ramakanta.HKS (AT) pamho (DOT) net>

Initiations in ISKCON <Initiations.in.ISKCON (AT) pamho (DOT) net>

Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:43:00 AM

Re: "the quotes are not direct evidence" (Ramakanta das) JAI!!!!

 

 

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> Should I also prove Krishna is God?

 

You are evading my challenge. Srila Prabhupada many times said that Krishna

is God or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. But it is not stated in the

Vedabase that we cannot enter the spiritual sky in our material bodies.

 

So now please follow Srila Prabhupada's instruction and the rules of this

debate and at once confirm by a quote that we cannot enter the spiritual sky

in our material bodies.

 

 

> a) Post exactly where I made this claim.

 

On Feb 3, 2007 you wrote, "your bogus injunction which I say is false".

 

So now please follow Srila Prabhupada's instruction and the rules of this

debate and at once confirm by a quote that my statement is false.

 

 

> It is illogical because unless Srila Prabhupada ...

 

Thank you for your analysis of my reply to your option 3).

 

 

> This debate is based ONLY on evidence that can be seen.

 

Does the evidence has to be seen by everyone? Or is it sufficient that it

can be seen by qualified persons?

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa

 

-----------------------

To from this mailing list, send an email to:

Initiations.in.ISKCON-Owner (AT) pamho (DOT) net

 

 

 

_____________________________

_____

 

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

http://new.mail.