Ramakanta still has no evidence to challenge point c.

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramakanta Prabhu,

PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

> 1) The GBC were set up as the ‘ultimate managing authority’ for ISKCON.

> 2) They were told exactly how to manage initiation.

> 3) They were told not to change the system of management.

 

<Why are you presenting these three additional points? Is your point c) not

proven by your points a) and b) only?>

 

This is a pathetically weak response clearly meant to distract attention away

from your defeat.

 

Our position is reinforced by layers of additional argumentation which I have

not yet deployed against your weak and hopeless challenges, as you well know.

Points a,b,and c, are themselves an extremely simplified and abbreviated

expression of the IRM’s position, as you well know. For a complete overview of

our position I recommend you read all our responses to GBC approved position

papers.

 

Your current challenge:

 

<You have not proven that the only way to authorize a devotee to be a diksa

guru in ISKCON is an order to the GBC which must have been seen by you.>

 

Is self defeating since:

 

"You have not proven that Srila Prabhupada has authorised that Ramakanta das

(or anyone else) can challenge his visible, signed directives to the GBC and

approved resolutions on the basis of theoretical, invisible orders"

 

Your challenge also effectively concedes defeat within a debate which is based

on existent, visible evidence.

 

I have proven that, on the basis of visible evidence (which is the ONLY type

this debate allows), our position stands and your challenges fails. However, I

accept that within your own dreamy, speculative fantasy land, where that which

exists has no more weight than that which does not, we may be completely

defeated.

 

You now need to find someone else willing to debate you on the basis of new,

crazy rules that allow visible orders to be challenged or terminated on the

basis of phantom evidence. Remember:

 

'Evidence that doesn't exist is no evidence at all'

 

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu

 

 

 

 

Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich - CH)

<Ramakanta.HKS (AT) pamho (DOT) net>

Initiations in ISKCON <Initiations.in.ISKCON (AT) pamho (DOT) net>

Saturday, February 24, 2007 7:02:00 AM

Ramakanta still has no evidence to challenge point c.

 

 

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

> 1) The GBC were set up as the ‘ultimate managing authority’ for ISKCON.

> 2) They were told exactly how to manage initiation.

> 3) They were told not to change the system of management.

 

Why are you presenting these three additional points? Is your point c) not

proven by your points a) and b) only?

 

ys Ramakanta dasa

 

-----------------------

To from this mailing list, send an email to:

Initiations.in.ISKCON-Owner (AT) pamho (DOT) net

 

 

 

_____________________________

_____

Want to start your own business?

Learn how on Small Business.

http://smallbusiness./r-index