Ramakanta still has no evidence to challenge point c.

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> Our position is reinforced by layers of additional argumentation which I

> have not yet deployed against your weak and hopeless challenges, as you

> well know.

 

As I already wrote, you can present them later. First you have to admit that

your points a) and b) alone do not prove your point c).

 

 

> Points a,b,and c, are themselves an extremely simplified and abbreviated

> expression of the IRM’s position, as you well know.

 

Yes I know that. But your points a), b) and c) are not an argument because

the inference "if a and b then c" confirmed by Srila Prabhupada is missing

and therefore they do not prove anything.

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa