Guest guest Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 If you are seriously intersted, you can talk to Krushna ji, online, and look into the system that he follows. Up to you...but he has given predictions (no chela-chapatigiri) not only for death but many other things to the day. --Manoshi , "Rohiniranjan" <jyotish_vani wrote: > > More power to them, in that case! I have not seen any like that and I > don't believe in rumours, hearsay and promotional claims by > interested parties and chela chapatis! You are welcome to share your > experiences in more details ...! > > RR > > , kid kid <astrokkid@> > wrote: > > > > cannot agree.Really competent Astrologers (Rare) could assess > longevity with a fair degree of accuracy , and upto month could > easily be predicted. > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > None that are correct all the time or even most of the > times! > > > > Sorry! > > > > , "kishore_kv" > > <kishore_kv@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear RR, > > > > > > Yes I am still alive! If there is a tie with the method of three > > > pairs, what are the other techniques that can be accurately used > > for > > > determining longetivity. That is precisely what I wanted. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kishore > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I am assuming that this individual born in 1971 and now > 32 > > years > > > > (nominal limit for laghu ayu) is still alive? Mind you, in > terms > > > of > > > > ayu determination, it is not wise to use just one technique! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , "kishore_kv" > > > > <kishore_kv@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > > > > > > > You are right that one of the indicators (moon - the lord of > > > lagna > > > > > as well as indicator in the pair moon-saturn for three pairs > > > > method) > > > > > got shifted from Aq to Pi when Raman's Ayanamsa was used as > > > opposed > > > > > to Lahiri ayanamsa. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Kishore > > > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > One of the indicators must have been near a rashi sandhi > and > > > got > > > > > > shifted by the ayanamsha change perhaps. > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Bhaskar" > > > > > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mention all the methods you have used alongwith the > > > analysis , > > > > > how > > > > > > did > > > > > > > you reach result of short life with one ayanamsha and > long > > > with > > > > > > > another ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And put this analysis in detail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "kishore_kv" > > > > > <kishore_kv@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear sirs, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a student of astrology. I am following the three > > > pairs > > > > > > method to > > > > > > > > determine longetivity. I am getting short life if I use > > > > Lahiri > > > > > > > > ayanamsa, while I get long life if I use Raman > ayanamsa. > > > Why > > > > > is > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > choice of Ayanamsa giving longetivity so different? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My birth details are: > > > > > > > > 00:30 am on 31/10/1971 at Guntur, Andhra pradesh India. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Awaiting your reply, > > > > > > > > Kishore > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out the all-new Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful > email and get things done faster. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 Dear Manoshi, Not that I am questioning your trust and belief, but if what this gentleman does is purely technical, how come there are not other names of individuals who follow his system and scored the same rate of success? Or are there?? You see, hopefully, what I am getting at? If it is based on a technique then it should be fully transferable and not limited to one individual. This has been the criticism in the 60s and 70s about KP. Krishnamurthy documentedly had a very high degree of success in horary predictions (all those when will the letter arrive or trunk call (long distance call) will mature were indeed great tests given the surroundings and circumstances back then!) but why were not many many others who became that famous through their successful utilization of KP? Look at a technical discipline like Medicine or Engineering! Now I know there would be differences between individual doctors and engineers but the inter-individual variation (difference in performance levels between practitioners) in those "technical" subjects are way smaller than between astrologers. Why? I think it is because astrology is not technical or technique dependent! Do you agree with my reasoning? RR , "Manoshi Chatterjee" <khallopapa wrote: > > If you are seriously intersted, you can talk to Krushna ji, online, > and look into the system that he follows. Up to you...but he has > given predictions (no chela-chapatigiri) not only for death but many > other things to the day. > > --Manoshi > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > More power to them, in that case! I have not seen any like that and > I > > don't believe in rumours, hearsay and promotional claims by > > interested parties and chela chapatis! You are welcome to share > your > > experiences in more details ...! > > > > RR > > > > , kid kid <astrokkid@> > > wrote: > > > > > > cannot agree.Really competent Astrologers (Rare) could assess > > longevity with a fair degree of accuracy , and upto month could > > easily be predicted. > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > None that are correct all the time or even most of the > > times! > > > > > > Sorry! > > > > > > , "kishore_kv" > > > <kishore_kv@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear RR, > > > > > > > > Yes I am still alive! If there is a tie with the method of > three > > > > pairs, what are the other techniques that can be accurately > used > > > for > > > > determining longetivity. That is precisely what I wanted. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kishore > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am assuming that this individual born in 1971 and now > 32 > > > years > > > > > (nominal limit for laghu ayu) is still alive? Mind you, in > > terms > > > > of > > > > > ayu determination, it is not wise to use just one technique! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , "kishore_kv" > > > > > <kishore_kv@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > > > > > > > > > You are right that one of the indicators (moon - the lord > of > > > > lagna > > > > > > as well as indicator in the pair moon-saturn for three > pairs > > > > > method) > > > > > > got shifted from Aq to Pi when Raman's Ayanamsa was used as > > > > opposed > > > > > > to Lahiri ayanamsa. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Kishore > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One of the indicators must have been near a rashi sandhi > > and > > > > got > > > > > > > shifted by the ayanamsha change perhaps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Bhaskar" > > > > > > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mention all the methods you have used alongwith the > > > > analysis , > > > > > > how > > > > > > > did > > > > > > > > you reach result of short life with one ayanamsha and > > long > > > > with > > > > > > > > another ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And put this analysis in detail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "kishore_kv" > > > > > > <kishore_kv@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear sirs, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a student of astrology. I am following the three > > > > pairs > > > > > > > method to > > > > > > > > > determine longetivity. I am getting short life if I > use > > > > > Lahiri > > > > > > > > > ayanamsa, while I get long life if I use Raman > > ayanamsa. > > > > Why > > > > > > is > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > choice of Ayanamsa giving longetivity so different? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My birth details are: > > > > > > > > > 00:30 am on 31/10/1971 at Guntur, Andhra pradesh > India. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Awaiting your reply, > > > > > > > > > Kishore > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out the all-new Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful > > email and get things done faster. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.