Guest guest Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > First please withdraw your previous challenge. > > "You have not proven that the only way to authorize a devotee to be a > diksa guru in ISKCON is an order to the GBC which must have been seen by > you." This was not a challenge because I did not ask you to prove it. I just stated a fact. You don't have to prove it. It is not a challenge. > .or prove it is authorised by showing where: > > "Srila Prabhupada has authorised that Ramakanta das (or anyone else) can > challenge his visible, signed directives to the GBC on the basis of > theoretical, invisible orders." I already answered this on Oct 6, 2006 and on Dec 10, 2006: I am not challenging Srila Prabhupada's statement. I am challenging your interpretation of it. > You are contradicting yourself again since you are asking above for > visible evidence- “a quote” -when your whole challenge to point c) (which > is merely the logical outcome of a and b within the closed institutional > system we are discussing) is flimsily based on the theoretical existence > of invisible evidence. I ignore your strange philosophy that asking you to follow Srila Prabhupada's instruction is self-contradicting. You have not answered following: If you think that you don't have to follow Srila Prabhupada's instruction, that you can present statements without having the confirm them by quotes, then please explain why you think that. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.