Guest guest Posted March 4, 2007 Report Share Posted March 4, 2007 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > In this case the status quo was locked in place with signed directives to > the GBC just prior to Srila Prabhupada's physical departure. As I already wrote several times, if there is other evidence besides your points a) and b) that you think prove your point c), then you can present it later. First you have to admit that your points a) and b) alone do not prove your point c). You already half admitted it. I just want a clear statement from you. So please write, "We admit that our points a) and b) alone do not prove our point c). It is just our opinion that if points a) and b) are correct then point c) is proven. But we say that point c) is proven by other evidence." > You have to prove that the GBC can stop following the orders they were > given (July 9th etc) and thus change the status quo. I do not have to prove statements that I did not make. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2007 Report Share Posted March 4, 2007 Dear Ramakanta Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > In this case the status quo was locked in place with signed directives to > the GBC just prior to Srila Prabhupada's physical departure. <As I already wrote several times, if there is other evidence besides your points a) and b) that you think prove your point c), then you can present it later. First you have to admit that your points a) and b) alone do not prove your point c). You already half admitted it. I just want a clear statement from you.> If point a and b are correct, and you were unable to disprove them, the c follows logically within the closed system we are discussing. Since you are not even claiming: “that the GBC can stop following the orders they were given (July 9th etc) and thus change the status quo.” Point c is simply saying the GBC must carry on following the orders they were given and thus maintain the status quo. This need to follow the orders of the guru is axiomatic and hence does not require proof. And you are not even claiming that counter orders exist. Thus, at least so far as visible evidence goes, the debate is over. Eventually I'm confident you will realise you cannot defeat the truth. Best wishes Ys Yadu Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich - CH) <Ramakanta.HKS (AT) pamho (DOT) net> Initiations in ISKCON <Initiations.in.ISKCON (AT) pamho (DOT) net> Sunday, March 4, 2007 7:16:00 AM Ramakanta contradicts himself again. Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > In this case the status quo was locked in place with signed directives to > the GBC just prior to Srila Prabhupada's physical departure. As I already wrote several times, if there is other evidence besides your points a) and b) that you think prove your point c), then you can present it later. First you have to admit that your points a) and b) alone do not prove your point c). You already half admitted it. I just want a clear statement from you. So please write, "We admit that our points a) and b) alone do not prove our point c). It is just our opinion that if points a) and b) are correct then point c) is proven. But we say that point c) is proven by other evidence." > You have to prove that the GBC can stop following the orders they were > given (July 9th etc) and thus change the status quo. I do not have to prove statements that I did not make. ys Ramakanta dasa ----------------------- To from this mailing list, send an email to: Initiations.in.ISKCON-Owner (AT) pamho (DOT) net _____________________________ _____ Cheap talk? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > If point a and b are correct, and you were unable to disprove them, the c > follows logically within the closed system we are discussing. Where did you read that? > Point c is simply saying the GBC must carry on following the orders they > were given and thus maintain the status quo. Now you presented a new conclusion. We can discuss is later. First you have to admit that your points a) and b) alone do not prove that Srila Prabhupada remains the sole diksa guru for ISKCON. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.