radhagovind Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 In hinduism, there are many things that science can't proove and has prooven. Such as when we say trees are living, science proves that later on. Or about the bridge between india and sri lanka, science has been able to see that using sattelite systems. So from this, do you think that most facts in hinduism are going to be proven slowly by science as everything that hinduism says is true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guruvani Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 In hinduism, there are many things that science can't proove and has prooven. Such as when we say trees are living, science proves that later on. Or about the bridge between india and sri lanka, science has been able to see that using sattelite systems. So from this, do you think that most facts in hinduism are going to be proven slowly by science as everything that hinduism says is true? the latest thing the scientists are saying about the "bridge to Lanka" is that it is a natural formation and is not man made. so, this is not a good example of science confirming shastra. they have studied the "bridge" and concluded that it is a natural formation and could not have been built by man or gods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.