Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Non-vegetarian food permitted in Christianity and Hinduism

Rate this topic


Vrindavan

Recommended Posts

Non-vegetarian food permitted in Christianity and Hinduism

Dr. Zakir Naik, a renowned Islamic scholar and comparative religion expert, proves from the Bible and the Hindu scriptures that non vegetarian food (meat) is permitted in Christianity and Hinduism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OMXfBRK5DU

 

Is non-vegetarian food permitted or prohibited? Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSmI35gkikA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Non-vegetarian food permitted in Christianity and Hinduism

Dr. Zakir Naik, a renowned Islamic scholar and comparative religion expert, proves from the Bible and the Hindu scriptures that non vegetarian food (meat) is permitted in Christianity and Hinduism.

 

Is non-vegetarian food permitted or prohibited? Part 1

 

You can pass the Bloody dish to someone with fangs and a stomach to digest the bloody remains But I have my faith in Sirla Prabhupada's words as authoritive over so called "religious expert Dr. Zakir Naik" :kick:

 

Thanks But NOOOO! Thanks :outta:

 

Hare Krsna

 

Jay Sirla Prabhupada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suicide is "permitted" in Christianity and Hinduism as well. However, it is very clear (at least in "Hinduism") what the consequences of suicide are.

 

Eating meat (especially today when there is so much pollution) is a slow form of suicide (just as eating non-prasadam in general is).

 

 

Non-vegetarian food permitted in Christianity and Hinduism

Dr. Zakir Naik, a renowned Islamic scholar and comparative religion expert, proves from the Bible and the Hindu scriptures that non vegetarian food (meat) is permitted in Christianity and Hinduism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OMXfBRK5DU

 

Is non-vegetarian food permitted or prohibited? Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSmI35gkikA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not the eating of the flesh that is sinful, sicking yes but sinful is a stretch. I believe the real sin is in how the animals are treated and then slaughtered that is the real sin. Cruelty has no part in a progressive spiritual path.

 

These people that try to justify being cruel with a verse from their book that tells them it's OK to be cruel as long as they perform the proper ritual to mask their savagery are delusional. I ain't buying it. The same goes for all the animal sacrifice in the vedas. Barbaric IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

These people that try to justify being cruel with a verse from their book that tells them it's OK to be cruel as long as they perform the proper ritual to mask their savagery are delusional. I ain't buying it. The same goes for all the animal sacrifice in the vedas. Barbaric IMO.

 

Well, yes. *AND*, isn't it better for a barbarian to slaughter an animal in a ritualistic way, giving honor to the animal and the Lord or Lords rather than simply slaughtering the animal with no spiritual consciousness whatsoever?

 

As somebody explained to me once: in the context of the civilizations existing at the time of the revelation of the Old Testament of the Bible--the doctrine of an eye for an eye was a revolutionarily merciful one.

 

Of course, as the barbarians grew more civilized, they became ready for Jesus' revelation of "turn the other cheek".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, are you a soybean or a carrot?

 

;)

 

I am a nut.(well, peanuts are actually a legume)

Is that what you wanted to hear?:D

 

Are you an onion?:D

 

I am hing.

 

I am making a pot of vegetable stew for dinner..... no onions - no carrots.

I like celery, green peppers, tomatoes, potatoes and curry powder with hing.

 

I don't eat anything that has a face or eyes.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

why are you hurting the knees of your children?:D

 

I never hurt the knees of my children.:D

 

Right, they were never allowed to run around, eh?

 

"Sorry", says Guruvani to his kids, "you can't go out to play--too dangerous!! You'll just have to stay in and watch movies and play videogames."

 

"Sorry," says Guruvani, "you must keep both feet on the ground while singing 'Hari Bol' during kirtan! Don't want you slipping in your socks on the slippery marble!!"

 

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

"Sorry", says Guruvani to his kids, "you can't go out to play--too dangerous!! You'll just have to stay in and watch movies and play videogames."

 

 

 

You better watch your mouth or I will have my 220 lb. son beat you up.:D

Or, my I will have my soccer playing 13 year old daughter kick your butt.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You better watch your mouth or I will have my 220 lb. son beat you up.:D

Or, my I will have my soccer playing 13 year old daughter kick your butt.:D

 

Your son isn't like 5'1", is he?

 

As for the soccer player--my butt is fine--it's got some padding. Just don't ask her to kick me in the shins!!

 

What were we talking about again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Your son isn't like 5'1", is he?

 

 

No, he is 5' 11' and he is as strong as a bull.

 

He's got some padding but he is not a rolly-polly.

 

He is also a brahmacary and he doesn't worry about girls.

 

He is a fine young man that I am very pleased with.

 

His name is Nitai Prasad.

He is a real nice guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No, he is 5' 11' and he is as strong as a bull.

 

He's got some padding but he is not a rolly-polly.

 

He is also a brahmacary and he doesn't worry about girls.

 

He is a fine young man that I am very pleased with.

 

His name is Nitai Prasad.

He is a real nice guy.

 

Sounds like an upstanding gentleman. I'd like to see how well he can resist my daughter's wiles in another 15 years, though! Of course, there has got to be a lot of temptation in Alachua.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Of course, there has got to be a lot of temptation in Alachua.

 

Probably, but he is not looking at this point.

He is a computer wiz and he is a gaming master.

 

He spent his childhood running around the hills of Badger.

 

He's not Krishna crazy yet.

Maybe when he gets older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well, yes. *AND*, isn't it better for a barbarian to slaughter an animal in a ritualistic way, giving honor to the animal and the Lord or Lords rather than simply slaughtering the animal with no spiritual consciousness whatsoever?

 

As somebody explained to me once: in the context of the civilizations existing at the time of the revelation of the Old Testament of the Bible--the doctrine of an eye for an eye was a revolutionarily merciful one.

 

Of course, as the barbarians grew more civilized, they became ready for Jesus' revelation of "turn the other cheek".

 

I see it as an offense to God rather it is cloaked in religious trappings or not. Even in the Old Testament different prophets put forth different "words of Jehovah". Concerning animal sacrifice one protested the slaughter by channeling Jehovah's word as "I desire mercy not sacrifice."

 

It is a confusing document when seen as a single work. For instance in Genesis 1 it is said man was given the fruit of the trees and green herbs for food. IOW's a VEGAN diet. Then later we come upon books describing how to slaughter the animal and sprinkle it's blood on the altar to God.

 

I am not as generous as you in this respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...