Rishi_L Posted February 1, 2008 Report Share Posted February 1, 2008 Is Bhuloka, commonly known as the ‘earthly realm’, referring to this entire physical universe that’s contactable by the five senses of our physical bodies? Does Bhuloka thus include everything observed through our modern telescopes? I’m asking this because I’m currently under the impression that the Vedic conception of the ‘earth’ element (out of the five elements in general) is a metaphor for matter in a solid state (and is therefore not referring simply to this particular planet, which is confusingly also called ‘Earth’). Therefore, as far as the 7 talas are concerned, I assume that they’re not all just physical realms which exist below our feet (although I still believe that Earth is definitely hollow and there ARE puranic statements that support this belief of mine). After all, the Vedic literature does supposedly mention 64 dimensions of existence. The 7 talas could be realms that are lower-dimensional and/or higher-dimensional in comparison to Bhuloka. They could exist at different rates of vibration. This could be what’s meant by ‘below Bhuloka’, that the 7 talas are NOT ‘below Bhuloka’ in terms of any kind of ‘surface’, but are ‘below Bhuloka’ in terms of their vibratory rates. Perhaps providing support for this theory is the claim made by South American shamans that, after ingesting certain hallucinogenic/psychoactive substances, they are allegedly able to gain access to an ‘underworld’. Intriguingly, the Sanskrit word ‘tala’ literally means ‘abyss’ or ‘chasm’. What does everyone here think? Is my understanding of Bhuloka and the 7 talas accurate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted February 1, 2008 Report Share Posted February 1, 2008 What does everyone here think? Is my understanding of Bhuloka and the 7 talas accurate? Accurate? I don't know. Interesting and worthy of consideration? Absolutely! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rishi_L Posted February 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2008 Accurate? I don't know. Interesting and worthy of consideration? Absolutely! Thanks for the kind words! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.