suchandra Posted July 14, 2008 Report Share Posted July 14, 2008 I love how he is being treated with Kid gloves. I didn`t see any " outrage " when this was printed in Rolling Stone. Lets see making fun of torture... Check Making fun of POWs.... Check Racist depiction of Asians... Check How people can be so merciless and cruel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 The Charlatan Obama BY: SYAMAKUNDA DAS (ACBSP) Jul 28, USA (SUN) — For all of my Godbrothers and Godsisters who want to vote for the party that supports abortion (over 300,000 for Planned Parenthood alone), the party that supports the Darwin’s Theory Group (the anti-intelligent design people), the party that is for same sex marriage, denigration of society in general (the Hollywood Group and all of their Godless movies), the party that is for the “Nanny State” (“we need big government to take care of us”), the party of socialists and such, go right ahead. If you think that the religious right is bad, just wait until the atheists really get a handle on society. I would expect that devotees will fall for the charlatan Obama (just see, he has a Hanuman Trinket in his pocket - he must be righteous) - just like many of my Godbrothers gave excellent Bhagavad Gita and Bhagavatam classes while in private, they were molesting children. Oh well, Srila Prabhupada said that in Kali Yuga, communism will eventually win out. From The London Times -- July 25, 2008: <CENTER>He ventured forth to bring light to the world: The anointed one's pilgrimage to the Holy Land is a miracle in action - and a blessing to all his faithful followers </CENTER><CENTER> </CENTER><CENTER>By Gerard Baker </CENTER><CENTER> </CENTER> And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness. The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow. When he was twelve years old, they found him in the temple in the City of Chicago, arguing the finer points of community organisation with the Prophet Jeremiah and the Elders. And the Elders were astonished at what they heard and said among themselves: “Verily, who is this Child that he opens our hearts and minds to the audacity of hope?” In the great Battles of Caucus and Primary he smote the conniving Hillary, wife of the deposed King Bill the Priapic and their barbarian hordes of Working Class Whites. And so it was, in the fullness of time, before the harvest month of the appointed year, the Child ventured forth - for the first time - to bring the light unto all the world. He travelled fleet of foot and light of camel, with a small retinue that consisted only of his loyal disciples from the tribe of the Media. He ventured first to the land of the Hindu Kush, where the Taleban had harboured the viper of al-Qaeda in their bosom, raining terror on all the world. And the Child spake and the tribes of Nato immediately loosed the Caveats that had previously bound them. And in the great battle that ensued the forces of the light were triumphant. For as long as the Child stood with his arms raised aloft, the enemy suffered great blows and the threat of terror was no more. From there he went forth to Mesopotamia where he was received by the great ruler al-Maliki, and al-Maliki spake unto him and blessed his Sixteen Month Troop Withdrawal Plan even as the imperial warrior Petraeus tried to destroy it. And lo, in Mesopotamia, a miracle occurred. Even though the Great Surge of Armour that the evil Bush had ordered had been a terrible mistake, a waste of vital military resources and doomed to end in disaster, the Child's very presence suddenly brought forth a great victory for the forces of the light. And the Persians, who saw all this and were greatly fearful, longed to speak with the Child and saw that the Child was the bringer of peace. At the mention of his name they quickly laid aside their intrigues and beat their uranium swords into civil nuclear energy ploughshares. From there the Child went up to the city of Jerusalem, and entered through the gate seated on an ass. The crowds of network anchors who had followed him from afar cheered “Hosanna” and waved great palm fronds and strewed them at his feet. In Jerusalem and in surrounding Palestine, the Child spake to the Hebrews and the Arabs, as the Scripture had foretold. And in an instant, the lion lay down with the lamb, and the Israelites and Ishmaelites ended their long enmity and lived for ever after in peace. As word spread throughout the land about the Child's wondrous works, peoples from all over flocked to hear him; Hittites and Abbasids; Obamacons and McCainiacs; Cameroonians and Blairites. And they told of strange and wondrous things that greeted the news of the Child's journey. Around the world, global temperatures began to decline, and the ocean levels fell and the great warming was over. The Great Prophet Algore of Nobel and Oscar, who many had believed was the anointed one, smiled and told his followers that the Child was the one generations had been waiting for. And there were other wonderful signs. In the city of the Street at the Wall, spreads on interbank interest rates dropped like manna from Heaven and rates on credit default swaps fell to the ground as dead birds from the almond tree, and the people who had lived in foreclosure were able to borrow again. Black gold gushed from the ground at prices well below $140 per barrel. In hospitals across the land the sick were cured even though they were uninsured. And all because the Child had pronounced it. And this is the testimony of one who speaks the truth and bears witness to the truth so that you might believe. And he knows it is the truth for he saw it all on CNN and the BBC and in the pages of The New York Times. Then the Child ventured forth from Israel and Palestine and stepped onto the shores of the Old Continent. In the land of Queen Angela of Merkel, vast multitudes gathered to hear his voice, and he preached to them at length. But when he had finished speaking his disciples told him the crowd was hungry, for they had had nothing to eat all the hours they had waited for him. And so the Child told his disciples to fetch some food but all they had was five loaves and a couple of frankfurters. So he took the bread and the frankfurters and blessed them and told his disciples to feed the multitudes. And when all had eaten their fill, the scraps filled twelve baskets. Thence he travelled west to Mount Sarkozy. Even the beauteous Princess Carla of the tribe of the Bruni was struck by awe and she was great in love with the Child, but he was tempted not. On the Seventh Day he walked across the Channel of the Angles to the ancient land of the hooligans. There he was welcomed with open arms by the once great prophet Blair and his successor, Gordon the Leper, and his successor, David the Golden One. And suddenly, with the men appeared the archangel Gabriel and the whole host of the heavenly choir, ranks of cherubim and seraphim, all praising God and singing: “Yes, We Can.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jinglebells Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 The Charlatan Obama BY: SYAMAKUNDA DAS (ACBSP) Jul 28, USA (SUN) — For all of my Godbrothers and Godsisters who want to vote for the party that supports abortion (over 300,000 for Planned Parenthood alone), the party that supports the Darwin’s Theory Group (the anti-intelligent design people), the party that is for same sex marriage, denigration of society in general (the Hollywood Group and all of their Godless movies), the party that is for the “Nanny State” (“we need big government to take care of us”), the party of socialists and such, go right ahead. If you think that the religious right is bad, just wait until the atheists really get a handle on society. This piece is proof that atheists are better than religious people. The racist attack throughout this essay (combined with explicit support for outdated creationist ideas, attack on homosexuals etc.) is evidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suchandra Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 All the newspaper actually supported this. Since the iron curtain fell and there's no more communism they needed to invent a new danger - global terrorism. Everywhere you have bombs blasting and when examing more close you'll find that all these bombs always kill the poorest of the poor. Global terrorists always going for killing the poorest? Now they restarted war in Afghan, the Taliban suddenly having efficient weapons to kill 300 young soldiers from UK. And Obama travelling all the way to what he calls Nazi-Berlin - what he learned at school, "real knowledge", Berliners are all Hitler's offspring and how could it be otherwise, telling these young people, boys and girls, to go and fight in Afghan. Total casualties (2008)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_of_the_War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)#Total_casualties_.282008.29 In the first six months of 2008, more than 2,100 people were killed<sup id="cite_ref-108" class="reference">[109]</sup>, including 698 civilians<sup id="cite_ref-109" class="reference">[110]</sup>. 502 militants were killed by March 14.<sup id="cite_ref-110" class="reference">[111]</sup> In June of 2008 alone 613 people died in insurgent violence, including: 473 militants, 34 civilians and 44 Afghan security forces.<sup id="cite_ref-111" class="reference">[112]</sup><sup id="cite_ref-112" class="reference">[113]</sup> 72 Afghan policemen were killed during the month of April.<sup id="cite_ref-113" class="reference">[114]</sup> The UN said in June, 2008 that nearly 700 Afghan civilians had been killed during the year, about two-thirds in attacks by militants and about 255 in military operations. <sup id="cite_ref-114" class="reference">[115]</sup> OBAMA SELLS EUROPE ON AFGHAN WAR http://www.vloggingtheapocalypse.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=676&title=OBAMA_SELLS_EUROPE_ON_AFGHAN_WAR <embed src=" " type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svarupa Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 The Charlatan Obama BY: SYAMAKUNDA DAS (ACBSP) Jul 28, USA (SUN) — For all of my Godbrothers and Godsisters who want to vote for the party that supports abortion (over 300,000 for Planned Parenthood alone - blah blah blah blah blah blah), ” So are you going to vote for the other guy whose supporters kill millions of Cows and allows eveyone to carry a gun that leads to 30,000 deaths every year and 65,000 gun injuries etc etc. As an early disciple of Srila Prabhupada, he always taught us to make the best of a difficult situation My point is they are as bad as each. Why just point out Obama? I don't think that's very intelligent. I think the intelligent thing to do, is support the one who can help our ISKCON movement the best, that's how Prabhupada taught us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahak Posted July 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 puke me out the door. So some fanatic hare krsna supports the right wing, Im supposed to lock step with him? And racist it is. Because the most fervant anti-abortionists happen to be Farrakhans Black Muslims. And the complete murdering nazis happen to be the Bush klan that fully funds the pharmaceuticals who fully support the Margartet Sangerites. I dont have a problem with conservatism. If Goldwater were here, hed have my vote. But what passes for conservatism now is the most ludicrous perversion. In fact, shopw me conservative fiscal policy, show me conservativism in foreign relations. You cannot, because we are consumed by the same jihadists disguised as christians. Im not really in line with him, but Buchanan is more anti bush that hillary. Buchanan and folks like ron paul, these folks are conservatives, not the western jihadists that have usurped the right wing and the repugnantan party. Anyway, this devotee has his opinion, and I have mine, but I wont kill him for his, but I think he will for mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahak Posted July 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 "For all of my Godbrothers and Godsisters who want to vote for the party blah blah blah" Im sure hes not talking to me, because I aint his godbrother anyway. His party is the one who supports the cult mentality that uses the pulpit to garner votes out of the mindless sheep who can carry a thought anyway. Obama? Not krsna, not the second coming of Jesus. But if he is compared to Carter, that gives him my vote, because Carter is the only one who recognized religion to be the bane of mankind, something to be abandoned fully for any progress in society. Carter is laughed at, but only he had folks like Sadat and Begin agreeing to end hostility based on false identification of religion as the self. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 So are you going to vote for the other guy whose supporters kill millions of Cows and allows eveyone to carry a gun that leads to 30,000 deaths every year and 65,000 gun injuries etc etc. As an early disciple of Srila Prabhupada, he always taught us to make the best of a difficult situation My point is they are as bad as each. Why just point out Obama? I don't think that's very intelligent. I think the intelligent thing to do, is support the one who can help our ISKCON movement the best, that's how Prabhupada taught us. :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: who the hell should we vote for then, my dear prabhu??? :smash: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahak Posted July 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 vote for one who loves his enemies as much as he loves himself and who loves God with all parts of his being. Vote for one who may go to war, but does so without hatred, envy, self motivated desire. Vote for one who has the ability to control not anger, but the actions of anger. McCain dont fit the bill, but Obama just might (to a certain degree). Hillary definitely fails miserably on all these important traits. Study nectar of devotion and see who possesses the most characteristics of the Vaisbnava. Then dont vote. Who does Sri Jayadwaita Swami support? Id listen to him. My godbrother who has taught me much is right wing, so we break there, I cant follow him politically, but then again, he knows this because I told him 30 years ago. So, ask the gentile souls like Jayadwaita, or even Sri Paramadvaiti Swami. I dont know where the reactionary right infiltrated this movement, but when I joined, there were more lefties than supporters of the US materialistic debauchery, despite the pandering on issues like abortion and fags. Republicans are NOT about saving crack babies from the abortionist, nor are they about stopping perverted sexual expression, they dont stop animal slaughter, they dont stop intoxication or gambling or mental speculation, so quit BSing yourselves into believing that bush, McCain or any of these demons are even the slightest bit aligned with my guru maharaja. Maybe goldwater, he was a statesman with ksatriya qualities, but none since. Maybe Jimmy Carter had some good qualities, but Prabhupada insists that western democracy is "fools electing the bigest fools to lead them straight to hell". Believe it or not, thats what he said to me personally. mahak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinitesimal108 Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 I used to lean towards Republican due to the abortion issue, but they've had their chances. The Reagan years, the Bush & Son years, that's 20 years of Republican leadership in the last 28 years and they can't stop abortion. I want abortion to stop as much as anyone, but it's not going to happen except through education and enlightenment, probably on the grass roots level. At least Obama keeps a trinket of Hanuman Ji in his pocket. I'm not saying that makes him qualified as President. Personally, I'm not voting.. for the same reasons Mahak mentioned. But if I had my druthers as a bystander observing this whole process, I would prefer Obama. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 "fools electing the biggest fools to lead them straight to hell.":smash: vote for one who loves his enemies as much as he loves himself and who loves God with all parts of his being. Vote for one who may go to war, but does so without hatred, envy, self motivated desire. Vote for one who has the ability to control not anger, but the actions of anger. ... Study nectar of devotion and see who possesses the most characteristics of the Vaisbnava. Then dont vote. ... but Prabhupada insists that western democracy is "fools electing the biggest fools to lead them straight to hell". Believe it or not, thats what he said to me personally. mahak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 Obama is Not Evil BY: MARK PTULNEY Jul 30, USA (SUN) — It really is appalling that so many people who proclaim "I am a devotee of Krishna" think that the political ideology of America's Republican Party is somehow connected to Krishna and Bhakti. In his recent article, "The Charlatan Obama", Syamakunda dasa opposes Barack Obama. He sees Obama as a politician who is pro-abortion, left-wing, anti-intelligent design, pro-homosexual, pro-Big-Government, etc. Lets think about this, then. And let's consider also whether the promotion of "American Republicanism" is ever going to be helpful for the promotion of Krishna Bhakti in this world. Maybe we shouldn't support Obama but should we support the Republicans? The Republican base claims to support the principle of "right to life". But when the Republican controlled American armed forces invaded Iraq to get control of Iraq's oil they didn't show much respect for the right to life of Iraq's citizens. Women and children and men living in their own homeland were killed in tens of thousands. The war the American forces waged from the sky was like the merciless fighting of "un-kshatriya-like" fighters in the Israelite armies that invaded Palestine long ago, when the invaders exterminated its residents, killing babies, mothers and men - everyone. Even the cows and goats (1 Samuel 15:2-3). Estimates of the number of people killed in this pointless war in Iraq do vary greatly. But let's just agree that a lot of innocent people have been killed by the Christian-led invaders that have waged a futile war on the false premise that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Why hasn't Bush been imprisoned for sending his army into a war on the basis of false "intelligence" and lies? Mr. Syamakunda, please answer that question if you will. This war America is losing or has lost has been a disaster for nearly everyone involved. Except of course the oil companies, the American weapons manufacturers, and Al Queda and its leader, the reclusive Bin Laden. Bin Laden is living a quiet life these days. But we may think he is enjoying his life immensely. All the things he wanted to achieve in life are being gradually achieved, day by day. After Bin Laden finished his previous American sponsored business fighting the godless Russians in Afghanistan, he began his next project called Al Queda. This Al Queda really prospered! It is like an American multi-level franchise business - especially in Iraq. This venture has become a focal point for Muslims opposed to what many Muslims see as the "invader crusaders", the foreigners who are plundering the wealth of their lands. Indeed, it needs to be pointed out that the President of Iraq approves of Obama's withdrawal timetable! Even the puppets and stooges are looking ahead to the time when the Americans withdraw - they want the Americans out of their country. Left-wing is bad? Maybe. But is right-wing good? Bush's big oil connections and Cheney's military industry cronies have made millions since the war began. Meanwhile the little people are paying more of their money every time they go to the gas station. To deny that the war against Islamists is the cause of high fuel prices is simply stupid. Bush was/is an oilman and he went after more oil. You are stupid if you don't recognize that fact. Freedom? Does America promote freedom of thought and freedom of religion? Numerous court cases are running right now, where men and women in uniform are saying the US Army is controlled by Evangelical Christians who are believers in the doomsday philosophy of Armageddon. Many people are concerned that the US armed forces are a danger to true democracy. What is more, if a few individuals in American uniforms in Iraq are telling people about Krishna is that really the sort of preaching that Nityananda Prabhu and Mahaprabhu would approve of? Read the Caitanya Caritamrta to see what Sri Caitanya felt about Islam. It is very clear. Don't fight Islam. Be humble, tolerant, offer respects to others. This is Sri Caitanya's teachings. It is dishonest and deceptive to say that the Gaudiya Vaisnava Acaryas support any sort of militarism. The armies of radical Islamism have already done their worst work in India hundreds of years ago (yes the Islamists are evil, demonic!). But India and Vaisnavism survived. Nothing can kill the soul of pure religion, for the soul is everlasting and immortal. When Kamsa's demons are roaming about they are not killed by the devotees - God kills all the sinners who persecute his devotees. And by the way, contrary to the popular belief that the "kshatriya mentality" is a mindset that is somehow included in the "Bhakti religion", if we read Caitanya Caritamrta and the discussion of Sri Caitanya with Ramananda Raya we see that Sri Caitanya himself said that devotees need to leave all the varna-ashrama mentalities behind and become REAL DEVOTEES. Materialistic people who enjoy power, playing with weapons and obedience to "Caeser" or Mammon may think they are devotees but real Bhakti is something that a gun lover remains totally unconscious of. Intelligent design? For the benefit of Iskcon devotees and related groups of individuals who think this Intelligent Design theory is somehow related to Vaisnavism, may I point out that most Vaisnavas in the world today do not believe in Intelligent Design. Indeed most Vaisnavas in the world today are Srivaisnavas and according to the greatest Srivaisnava Acarya, Sri Ramanuja Acarya, who is most certainly a Vaisnava and an Acarya (not an atheist), it is useless to try and argue with materialists and proclaim "God Exists", using logic or science or "physical evidence" or Intelligent Design theories. Ramanuja stated that even if it were possible to prove a god had created the universe, it is also possible that there are other universes created by other gods. Indeed the Srimad Bhagavatam says that there are many universes created by many gods (brahmas) and not all of these "universe creator gods" are actually favourable and devoted to Krishna. Thakura Bhaktivinode prayed, "kita-janma hau jatha tuwa dasa, bahir-mukha brahma janme nahi asa", i.e. "I want to be born as a worm in the home of a bhakta, rather than be born as a Brahma looking outwards at the world he has made". Is my point clear? The creator is an instrument of God and the creator of a universe may not necessarily be a totally divine person. Obama has spoken about religion, and expressed his view of the Christian tradition, a tradition that is the base ideology of American society. Americans in general believe in a Creator God and follow along in the Judeo/Christian tradition. But this tradition is far from divine. It is a much lower layer of spirituality than the religion of pure love that Caitanya Mahaprabhu taught. In many ways, it will be good if deep thinking people challenge the basic assumptions of Judeo/Christian beliefs. Those ancient beliefs are in many ways opposed to the teachings of the Vedas, and Sri Caitanya. Let us consider Barack Obama. Barack Obama asked, which passages of scripture should guide American public policy? Obama asked, "Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is an abomination? Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount?" Obama also said, Jesus' Sermon on the Mount was "a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our Defense Department would survive its application." I myself think Jesus was right when he said, "Blessed are the peacemakers". But will America's people and its leaders at the Defense Department ever be able to accommodate the radicalism Obama is promoting? God only knows! In conclusion: 1 And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain, and when He was seated His disciples came to Him. 2 Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying: 3 "Blessed are the poor in spirit, For theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 4 Blessed are those who mourn, For they shall be comforted. 5 Blessed are the meek, For they shall inherit the earth. 6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, For they shall be filled. 7 Blessed are the merciful, For they shall obtain mercy. 8 Blessed are the pure in heart, For they shall see God. 9 Blessed are the peacemakers, For they shall be called sons of God. 10 Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, For theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samia Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 "Prabhupada insists that western democracy is "fools electing the bigest fools to lead them straight to hell". Believe it or not, thats what he said to me personally." I don`t see either one of them being any good. For me though I would rather have someone in office that can be balanced out by the other elected officials and for me the evil of two lessers leaves me with McCain. I may not agree with most of his Ideas but to me at least he seems humble. Obamas most noteable characteristic is decepton and a sense of entitlement, it is not about anything other than him. My prediction though is by the time of the convention the Clintons will pull something off and we will be seeing Hillary getting the nomination, there have already been little blips about superdelegates switching and well at the rate Obama throws people under the bus he may not even have a campain staff within weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kulapavana Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 "fools electing the biggest fools to lead them straight to hell." I doubt that the management system Prabhupada introduced in Iskcon was any better in practice. Authocratic, top down management is far easier to manipulate and abuse by crafty and crooked individuals than democracy - and Iskcon's history is a proof of that. Those who can't properly manage their own affairs should not expect others to take seriously their advice on management of the state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kulapavana Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 for me the evil of two lessers leaves me with McCain. I may not agree with most of his Ideas but to me at least he seems humble. Both are crooks, liars, and special interest stooges. McCain means more war, more money wasted on the stupid wars his bosses support, more deficit, more unbalanced trade. Pick your poison or vote third party. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 I doubt that the management system Prabhupada introduced in Iskcon was any better in practice. Authocratic, top down management is far easier to manipulate and abuse by crafty and crooked individuals than democracy - and Iskcon's history is a proof of that. Those who can't properly manage their own affairs should not expect others to take seriously their advice on management of the state. :outta: :outta: sri visnu:pray: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kulapavana Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 :outta: :outta: sri visnu:pray: the truth hurts sometimes very often people don't take us seriously because we propose 'solutions' that don't work even for us, let alone the society in general, while we refuse to face the facts. Pradhupada was a pragmatic person - he would adjust things to make them work, even if it meant reversing himself on an issue. We should learn from our mistakes, not close our eyes to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 There was an article that posted to the Sampradaya Sun earlier this past week admonishing devotees for siding with the Republican party in America. I couldn’t agree more with that. How some devotees support ideas like intelligent design is mind-boggling. We clearly do not believe the same thing that Christians do when it comes to creation. The only similarity is that they are both God-centered. The Christian believe is that the world was created in six literal days and that the earth has only been around for 8,000ish years, barely longer than our Kali-yuga. Yet some devotees side with them due to the dangerous philosophy of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” However, the article in question is a thinly veiled defense of Barack Obama. Previously, a devotee published an article ripping apart Obama for his unvaisnava qualities. Rightly so, I suspect, since Obama isn’t a vaisnava. But this most recent article, while claiming the left wing (democrats, etc) to be “bad,” actually defends Obama. He references Obama stating that Christ’s Sermon on the Mount should guide American policy. Now, I’m a rather large fan of the Sermon on the Mount. You know, “blessed are the peacemakers, meek, etc.” And while it’s definitely a good idea to use these principles to manage your life, there is certainly no way in hell that America (or any other government, for that matter) would use them to guide policy. And if you believe that, you are being duped in some pretty nasty ways. I’m very sick of devotees following the Republican party. But I’m equally sick of devotees following the Democrats (possibly more sick, to be honest). In Aprilish, a devotee blogger even compared Obama to Brahma. Yeah, Lord Brahma. There were other postings gushing about how super awesome Obama was and how Krishna is blessing us with him. Someone certainly drank the Kool-Aide on this one. He was the same devotee who gave the Obama “Hope” poster vaisnava tilaka, marking Obama as a devotee of Lord Caitanya. It is hard for me to think of something more lame than that. I’ve tried, not possible. So will someone please tell me why so many devotees find it necessary to affiliate themselves as members of some political party? Aren’t we supposed to be above that? And fine, if you want to be a democrat or a republican and vote for “the lesser of two evils,” go for it. But why in all that is holy do you try to co-opt them and “make” them part of Krishna consciousness? Seriously, cut it out. We are devotees. We are above this. Governments in Kali-yuga are corrupt through and through. However, the Bush administration was no more corrupt than Clinton or Grant (back in the 1870’s) or George Washington’s for that matter. The government is made up of cheaters. The followers of either party are the cheated. We are devotees, followers of Lord Caitanya. We are not the cheaters, nor are we the cheated. We have a higher purpose. Even our Srila Prabhupada has said, “This democracy is a demon-crazy. It has no value. It is simply waste of time and effort and no feeling, demon-crazy.” He said this many times in reference to American democracy. So why should we support it? And so, dear vaisnavas, how about we stop wasting time supporting this demon-crazy government, or any government, and start focusing on spirituality, ok? Srila Prabhupada has given us everything we philosophically need. Why would we want to support some politician whose views cannot possibly be our own? Why settle for the “lesser of two evils” when we have Krishna consciousness? Through this we can help society, spiritually and materially, much more than lofty and soon-to-be-broken campaign promises. Revatinandana: The symbol of the Democrat party in America is the ass. Prabhupada: Oh, yes. Because they are asses. - Room Conversation — December 13, 1970, Indore by eric at July 31, 2008 01:07 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahak Posted August 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Because when asked what his favorite verse from the bible was, he destroyed the false christians with the sword Of Lord Jesus Christ, saying, "As ye treat the least among is how you treat me". They say he lost the debate there in orange county, but even Jesus Himself would not vote with those he prophesized "In the future, there will be those who, in My name, will heal and baptize, but I will say to them, get away from me, I know you not, for you have failed to do the will of He who has sent Me." The christians are not what one thinks, because they fail to follow the great commandment, they love so many things above the Lord, like country, political party, home, community, race, church, and they hate their neighbors above all else. They hate O bama because he is pro choice and hate him for having heard from Farakkhan, yet there is no one on earth more piously anti-abortion than Louis X. So, the real Christ followers should analyze the reality of Lord Jesus' teachings before aligning themselves with the so called christians that are engaged in active genocide because they want rapture and armageddon. I got news for them, gospel. Armageddon was in 79 AD, the fall of Jerusalem, as he predicted would happen even while his DIRECT disciples were still alive. All other armageddonist philosophy is bogus and anti-christian. Total irrelisious political concoction used to control stupid people. But, alas, O bama is thru, he peaked too early, he may not even survive the clintons, the true abortionists. mahaksadasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AncientMariner Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 Because when asked what his favorite verse from the bible was, he destroyed the false christians with the sword Of Lord Jesus Christ, saying, "As ye treat the least among is how you treat me". They say he lost the debate there in orange county, but even Jesus Himself would not vote with those he prophesized "In the future, there will be those who, in My name, will heal and baptize, but I will say to them, get away from me, I know you not, for you have failed to do the will of He who has sent Me." The christians are not what one thinks, because they fail to follow the great commandment, they love so many things above the Lord, like country, political party, home, community, race, church, and they hate their neighbors above all else. They hate O bama because he is pro choice and hate him for having heard from Farakkhan, yet there is no one on earth more piously anti-abortion than Louis X. So, the real Christ followers should analyze the reality of Lord Jesus' teachings before aligning themselves with the so called christians that are engaged in active genocide because they want rapture and armageddon. I got news for them, gospel. Armageddon was in 79 AD, the fall of Jerusalem, as he predicted would happen even while his DIRECT disciples were still alive. All other armageddonist philosophy is bogus and anti-christian. Total irrelisious political concoction used to control stupid people. But, alas, O bama is thru, he peaked too early, he may not even survive the clintons, the true abortionists. mahaksadasa Obama could win if he would tranform himself into a conservative in my opinion. He has been dragged down by a lot of his past associations with radical socialistic African American leaders that hear voices from UFOs telling them that white people are the cause of all suffering in the world and stuff. He should distance himself from all that and portray himself as a conservative Muslim man who transcends racial divides looking to unite Islam and Christianity because they are essentially very similar religions. Obama does seem to me to be more genuine than the Clintons but who knows for sure. I was rooting for him to beat Hillary all along but I got sick of him after I saw how the media turned everything into the Barrack Obama personality cult. That kind of stuff is just bizarre. Either way, politics for me anymore is cheap entertainment and I do not believe for one second that I have any ability to influence any change on the political landscape despite all the admonitions of those who say you should vote and all that. The whole game is manipulated just like wall street as far as I am concerned so I just view it all as a reality television show. So I sit looking on basically as an obnoxious heckler from the cheap seats making fun of everyone every chance I get just for the pure unadultered cheap entertainment of it. The ultimate game changer is going to be the Kalki-avatar I guess. After that I guess you can begin to take politics seriously again but unless Obama is some sort of avatar and that proves out with the passage of time I have to assume he is just another byproduct of the radical socialistic tendencies of leftist African American religous and political leaders. Muhammad Ali hung out with some of the same type of goof balls and he ended up transcending race and religion and is an exalted personality in my books so there is some hope for Obama but he needs to get his act together and do it quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahak Posted August 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 Muhammed ali hung with malcolm x, was not all that involved with elijah muhammed. Farakkhan was louis x, and he may have been the one who had malcolm x assassinated, because malcolm x rebelled against the racist philosophy of elijah muhammed. Old news, but I sure hope you arent calling malcolm x a goof ball, because he, even more than MLK, had the answers. I suggest you read his autobiography by alex haley, or even see the movie starring denzell washington. Religion is the worst thing about american politics because the kind of religion espoused is not that which srila prabhupada defines as real religion, surrender to the Supreme Person. The religion of american politics is that which Krsna tells arjuna to abandon all varieties of. Just like abortion. Why is this dead issue that which defines one who wishes to be president? No one running has performed one, no one running has had one (except maybe hillary, and bill probably paid for a few). Its like the gun issue. Most think the GOP is all for gun rights, when in actuality, the GOP will be the first to cause all to give them up. You are right AM, though, politics is merely entertainment. Hare krsna, ys, mahaksadasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suchandra Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 Since people think Barack Obama will be the next president some relatives can't wait any longer and pipe up. Barack Obama's 'lost' brother found in Kenya Nick Pisa � Telegraph.co.uk August 20, 2008 The Italian edition of Vanity Fair said that it had found George Hussein Onyango Obama living in a hut in a ramshackle town of Huruma on the outskirts of Nairobi. Mr Obama (left), 26, the youngest of the presidential candidate's half-brothers, spoke for the first time about his life, which could not be more different than that of the Democratic contender. "No-one knows who I am," he told the magazine, before claiming: "I live here on less than a dollar a month." According to Italy's Vanity Fair his two metre by three metre shack is decorated with football posters of the Italian football giants AC Milan and Inter, as well as a calendar showing exotic beaches of the world. Vanity Fair also noted that he had a front page newspaper picture of his famous brother - born of the same father as him, Barack Hussein Obama, but to a different mother, named only as Jael. He told the magazine: "I live like a recluse, no-one knows I exist." Embarrassed by his penury, he said that he does not does not mention his famous half-brother in conversation. "If anyone says something about my surname, I say we are not related. I am ashamed," he said. For ten years George Obama lived rough. However he now hopes to try to sort his life out by starting a course at a local technical college. He has only met his famous older brother twice - once when he was just five and the last time in 2006 when Senator Obama was on a tour of East Africa and visited Nairobi. The Illinois senator mentions his brother in his autobiography, describing him in just one passing paragraph as a "beautiful boy with a rounded head". Of their second meeting, George Obama said: "It was very brief, we spoke for just a few minutes. It was like meeting a complete stranger." George added he was no longer in contact with his mother and said:"I have had to learn to live and take what I need. "Huruma is a tough place, last January during the elections there was rioting and six people were hacked to death. The police don't even arrest you they just shoot you. "I have seen two of my friends killed. I have scars from defending myself with my fists. I am good with my fists." www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/2590614/Barack-Obamas-lost-brother-found-in-Kenya.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samia Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 Kind of telling that he enjoys his wealth while his extended family suffers. So much for a man of compassion huh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samia Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 I wonder if anyone can see the contrast between the 2 images. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amlesh Posted August 22, 2008 Report Share Posted August 22, 2008 Kind of telling that he enjoys his wealth while his extended family suffers. So much for a man of compassion huh. Everyone is responsible for his own situation. Barak needs to do his duty armed with Truth, Barak's lost brother should do his duty armed with Truth. If Barak has intention to enjoy when in power; there'll be a price to pay afterwards. Real Compassion is when someone does not see his own brother as the only brother, but universal brotherhood. I don't know what kind of relationship both brothers share, but he does not respect his own brother; then he is far from universal brotherhood, hence far from compassion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.