Tirisilex Posted June 12, 2008 Report Share Posted June 12, 2008 Been looking around in Buddhism again and found Metta Meditation.. A good guide for practicing Bhakti.. http://www.geocities.com/tokyo/6774/metta.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beggar Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Been looking around in Buddhism again and found Metta Meditation.. A good guide for practicing Bhakti.. http://www.geocities.com/tokyo/6774/metta.htm This is from Metta Meditation: Think of yourself as your own best friend; the one you can rely on to help you, to make you happy, to know what is best for you, who loves you. Feel yourself embraced by that friendship. This is from Srila Sridhar Maharaj's devotional (bhakti) Bhagavad Gita: And I am the well-wisher of all I am Krsna, the devotees' most adorable friend. The soul who thus knows My true identity attains the ecstasy of knowing his own original divine identity. Our minds can be our best friend also, if it becomes convinced to surrender to Krsna by reading real bhakti literature. Metta meditation devotees believe that we are our own best friend for they have no real information about the supreme personality of godhead, Sri Krsna. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tirisilex Posted June 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 I don't know where you got this information.. But Metta Meditation is about generating Loving Kindness.. The Metta Sutra This is what should be done By one who is skilled in goodness, And who seeks the path of peace: Let them be able and upright, Straightforward and gentle in speech. Humble and not conceited, Contented and easily satisfied. Unburdened with duties and frugal in their ways. Peaceful and calm, and wise and skillful, Not proud and demanding in nature. Let them not do the slightest thing That the wise would later reprove. Wishing: In gladness and in safety, May all beings be at ease. Whatever living beings there may be; Whether they are weak or strong, omitting none, The great or the mighty, medium, short or small, The seen and the unseen, Those living near and far away, Those born and to-be-born, May all beings be at ease! Let none deceive another, Or despise any being in any state. Let none through anger or ill-will Wish harm upon another. Even as a mother protects with her life Her child, her only child, So with a boundless heart Should one cherish all living beings: Radiating kindness over the entire world Spreading upwards to the skies, And downwards to the depths; Outwards and unbounded, Freed from hatred and ill-will. Whether standing or walking, seated or lying down Free from drowsiness, One should sustain this recollection. This is said to be the sublime abiding. By not holding to fixed views, The pure-hearted one, having clarity of vision, Being freed from all sense desires, Is not born again into this world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadheyRadhey108 Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Mahayana Buddhists often practice Bhakti to at least some degree. Most schools encourage the choosing of an Ishta-Devata who the devotee can concentrate on during meditation. They also encourage japa meditiation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tackleberry Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 This is from Metta Meditation: This is from Srila Sridhar Maharaj's devotional (bhakti) Bhagavad Gita: Our minds can be our best friend also, if it becomes convinced to surrender to Krsna by reading real bhakti literature. Metta meditation devotees believe that we are our own best friend for they have no real information about the supreme personality of godhead, Sri Krsna. Buddhists feel peace isn't possible in a state of fear, and therefore view dependence on other entities (like Krishna) as active causes of fear. This is why they shun dependence, even the dependence on the so-called self (they believe in no-self, anatta). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadheyRadhey108 Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Buddhists feel peace isn't possible in a state of fear, and therefore view dependence on other entities (like Krishna) as active causes of fear. This is why they shun dependence, even the dependence on the so-called self (they believe in no-self, anatta). Actually, not all Buddhists believe in anatta in the literal sense. Most Mahayana Buddhists think that there just isn't a 'seperate Self', and that we're all united in one Self. Mahayana Buddhists also don't shun dependence. They depend heavily on the mercy of the Bodhisattvas and often pray for their mercy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bija Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Most Mahayana Buddhists think that there just isn't a 'seperate Self', and that we're all united in one Self. by radhey So fear develops in this seperate consciousness. It's interesting that modern science is pointing to matter as an 'integral organic unit', rather than seperate units. It must be a fearful experience for some, to begin to realize the inter-connectedness of the organism, after identifying as the seperate illusory self for so long. There seems to be much benefit for the organism to contemplate on Tirisilex's post: The Metta Sutra This is what should be done By one who is skilled in goodness, And who seeks the path of peace: Let them be able and upright, Straightforward and gentle in speech. Humble and not conceited, Contented and easily satisfied. Unburdened with duties and frugal in their ways. Peaceful and calm, and wise and skillful, Not proud and demanding in nature. Let them not do the slightest thing That the wise would later reprove. Wishing: In gladness and in safety, May all beings be at ease. Whatever living beings there may be; Whether they are weak or strong, omitting none, The great or the mighty, medium, short or small, The seen and the unseen, Those living near and far away, Those born and to-be-born, May all beings be at ease! Let none deceive another, Or despise any being in any state. Let none through anger or ill-will Wish harm upon another. Even as a mother protects with her life Her child, her only child, So with a boundless heart Should one cherish all living beings: Radiating kindness over the entire world Spreading upwards to the skies, And downwards to the depths; Outwards and unbounded, Freed from hatred and ill-will. Whether standing or walking, seated or lying down Free from drowsiness, One should sustain this recollection. This is said to be the sublime abiding. By not holding to fixed views, The pure-hearted one, having clarity of vision, Being freed from all sense desires, Is not born again into this world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tackleberry Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Actually, not all Buddhists believe in anatta in the literal sense. Most Mahayana Buddhists think that there just isn't a 'seperate Self', and that we're all united in one Self. Mahayana Buddhists also don't shun dependence. They depend heavily on the mercy of the Bodhisattvas and often pray for their mercy. All Buddhists believe in anatta in the literal sense, or they wouldn't be buddhists. It's the central principle in their religion, kinda like there's no vaishnavism without Vishnu. And they view everything else, including bodhisatvas, as a means to an end, unlike theists who view their god as the means as well as the end. Hence, buddhists claim their so-called dependence exists so long as ignorance exists, and not further. Vaishnavas, on the other hand, depend on Vishnu for all time, and this creates fear and a slavish mentality; or so the buddhists claim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amlesh Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 The whole concept Bhakti revolves round Bhakta and Bhagvan. The rest I'll leave it to you to ponder about. You are all intelligent enough to know where to use this beautiful term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadheyRadhey108 Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 All Buddhists believe in anatta in the literal sense, or they wouldn't be buddhists. You clearly haven't studied Mahayana Buddhism in depth, or you would know that they do believe in a self, just not a seperate self. It's often explained as 'the wave is nondifferent from the water'. They think that, just as there are many waves but they're all really of the same substance and really only form one unit in the end, there appear to be many creatures, but each is really interconnected with everything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bija Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Good point Radhey. The Mahayana tradition is different than the Hinayana (which points to non-self and a need to leave this world). The Mahayana as far as I understand chooses to find peace while living fully in this world. And that inter-connection you are pointing to in your post is the key how to live that way. Infact modern science such as physics and some forms of psychology such as trans-personal psychology seem to speak of this inter-connectdness very clearly and scientifically. Most thoughtful people can surely see the validity of this way of vision even if not realized in it. Many eastern traditions are purely transcendental and aspire to leave this miserable world. These days I dont know if I fully accept that fundamnetal way of thinking in my personal realizations. There seems to be 3 things appearing in my consciousness. Small glimpses of the transcendental personage Sri Krsna (an alternate living reality), a vision of brahman, and a vision of brahman pervading this material world of objects. Personally I am finding an integral philosophy unfolding in my heart, which seeks to relish God's presence in all waves of energetic being (all three levels). I appreciate the Mahayana view of inter-connectedness very much and also its way of living fully in this world with deep clear minded presence. I perceive that inter-connectedness in day to day psychic/spiritual living and sensitivities to some degree. It is not theory for me, it is reality. For me God is all things, even this material energy. (All things). A transcendent being who is not aloof (but instead in full control of lower frequency energies). For me the transcendent realm of Sri Krsna is totally real substance within the realm of my citta (mind/heart), and seems to come down and prevade my conscious awareness which is in contact with matter simultaneously. So it feels like I am living in three different states of being (awareness) which are integrated into one. I must choose now if I which to receive more of Sri Krsna's realm and world (through cultivation). The world has become sacred, and with pure spiritual intent and non-violence, can become God's potential canvass (painting) of love. A sacred ground for bhakti on all levels of relation. Even the mundane (in some inconceivable way). On a side note: I am interested in art and patterns. The human mind seems to relish patterns. Young children make patterns with crayon and pens. Adolescents draw more complex patterns. These patterns seem to reflect the cosmic pattern which is indescribable in fullness. Energies of God intertwined and integrated in unlimited beautiful patterns. As the Mahayana tradition says - inter-connected. We are living within this cosmic energy pattern and seperateness is temporary, inter-connectedness is reality. A great realm of personality and potential lila. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bija Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Bhagavad Gita chapter 11 TEXT 53 - click for link and purport nāhaṁ vedair na tapasā na dānena na cejyayā śakya evaṁ-vidho draṣṭuṁ dṛṣṭavān asi māṁ yathā TRANSLATION The form which you are seeing with your transcendental eyes cannot be understood simply by studying the Vedas, nor by undergoing serious penances, nor by charity, nor by worship. It is not by these means that one can see Me as I am. TEXT 54 click for link and purport bhaktyā tv ananyayā śakya aham evaṁ-vidho ’rjuna jñātuṁ draṣṭuṁ ca tattvena praveṣṭuṁ ca parantapa TRANSLATION My dear Arjuna, only by undivided devotional service can I be understood as I am, standing before you, and can thus be seen directly. Only in this way can you enter into the mysteries of My understanding. For me bhakti is the ultimate path to self realization. Why? Reciprocal love on all levels culminating in love of summum bonum (all things). And hopefully oneday intimate personal relationship with Sri Krsna and his confidential associates (source of bliss). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrahma Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 The individual is a tiny particle of spirit. But when he isimprisoned in the gross and subtle material body, he becomes bewildered and thinks, "I am this gross and subtle material body." Thus he misunderstands his true identity. "Misunderstanding" is the only definition of 'vivarta' given in the Vedas. Someone may think, "I am Raghunatha Bhattacarya, the son of Sanatana Bhattacarya", and someone else may think, "I am Sadhu Candala, the son of Vise Candala". In this way the intelligence becomes bewildered. Both of those persons are individual souls, tiny particles of spirit. They are not Raghunatha Bhattacarya and Sadhu Candala. Still, they are bewildered and they think they are identical with the material body. To mistake a rope for a snake or the glistening on a seashell's surface for silver are other examples of misunderstandings (vivartas). By all these examples the Vedas teach that one should throw far away the idea that he is identical with the material body. The mayavadis (impersonalists), however, reject this proper use of the word 'vivarta' and teach a funny theory they called 'vivarta-vada'. They say that the idea "I am the Supreme" is the true idea, and the misconception, or vivarta, is the idea "I am an individual spirit soul". By accepting this kind of ''vivarta-vada" one will not understand what is the actual truth. The true vivarta-vada does not at all contradict the sakti-parinama-vada. On the other hand, the mayavadis (impersonalists') vivarta-vada is only an object of laughter. The mayavadis' vivarta-vada is of three kinds: 1. the soul is really Brahman but he becomes bewildered into thinking that he is an individual soul, 2. the idea that the individual souls are reflections of Brahman, and 3. the idea that Brahman takes a nap and dreams that He has become the many individual souls. None of these are the true vivarta-vada. The evidence of the Vedas refutes them all. Bhaktivinoda Thakura Sri Jaiva-dharma Volume Four Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bija Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 Yes cbrahma we are much more than this ego/body consciousness. And we are definately individual sparks of the whole. Many cannot understand this individuality as eternal, hey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrahma Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 yes individual sparks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tackleberry Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 You clearly haven't studied Mahayana Buddhism in depth, I have, which is why I am asking you to provide some references where the word 'atman' is used in the same way the hindus use it. Without anatta, there's no Buddhism, and that includes mahayana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.