BBT turns down GBC recommendation, will not add explanations to Prabhupada's books

[Sarva gattah]

Spiritual intelligence prevails! Don't do what the Catholic Church did to the Bible 1600 years ago. BBT turns down GBC recommendation, will not add "explanations" to Prabhupada's books

 

Submitted by jswami on June 19, 2008 - 11:35pm. About editing Today the Bhaktivedanta Book Trust released this statement.

 

The ISKCON Governing Body Commission has recommended to the BBT trustees that we insert endnotes or appendices into Srila Prabhupada’s books to explain statements Srila Prabhupada makes in Srimad-Bhagavatam 4.25.41, 4.25.42, and 4.26.26 concerning a woman’s attitude towards the aggressive advances of a man and towards a man who is “expert at rape.” The GBC has also recommended that the endnotes or appendices explain “other such statements.”

 

The BBT directors, at their annual meeting in June of 2008, considered these recommendations and decided to turn them down.

 

The directors have in fact discussed the relevant issues at length during several BBT meetings over the past few years. We have listened to opinions from concerned devotees and nondevotees. And additionally we have sought and received written advice on these issues from a selection of senior devotees, both male and female.

 

The directors have considered several suggested approaches to the issues, including deleting or revising the controversial passages, adding footnotes, adding appendices, publishing free-standing explanatory inserts, publishing separate books of commentary, and doing nothing at all.

 

As a result of our deliberations, we decided that the best approach would be to set up a site on the web where readers can go to get a better understanding of statements from Srila Prabhupada’s books that may be controversial, contrary to prevailing social norms, or otherwise difficult to comprehend or digest.

 

As we reprint Srila Prabhupada’s books, we plan to include on the copyright page a brief note directing readers to that site for guidance on such matters. This web site was already in development long before the meeting at which the GBC passed their resolution.

 

Addressing these issues on a website offers the following advantages, among others:

 

It allows us to include explanations from several different viewpoints, not just one.

 

It gives the authors space to write at whatever length they feel they need.

It keeps Srila Prabhupada’s books free from editorial intrusions.

It avoids needlessly highlighting statements that many readers may not find disturbing.

 

It spares us from having to publish “official explanations” for statements about which even Srila Prabhupada’s leading disciples and followers have divided opinions.

 

It saves us from the danger of publishing in Srila Prabhupada’s books an explanation with which he himself might disagree.

 

It keeps us from embarking on the treacherous path of “explaining” more and more of Srila Prabhupada’s controversial or potentially controversial statements.

 

We foresee that Srila Prabhupada’s followers will eventually write many books of commentary to directly explain and elaborate upon the teachings found in his books, and we welcome this. We see the website as an initial step in that direction.

 

In this letter we also wish to respond to the specifics of the GBC’s recommendation.

 

The GBC’s resolution gives three reasons for their recommendation. Two are these:

 

“Some of Srila Prabhupada’s books contain sentences [like those cited] which when taken in isolation may be considered derogatory to and offensive against women.”

 

“Some people who read such statements may consider them to be derogatory or offensive, may misunderstand what Srila Prabhupada actually means, and may not want to further read those books, notwithstanding the many other beneficial statements in them.”

 

Regarding these two reasons, we recognize that Srila Prabhupada’s books sometimes make statements that some readers may consider offensive—offensive to women, to science and scientists, to democratic ideals, to other Gaudiya Vaisnavas, to scholarship and scholars, to homosexuals, to pacifists, humanitarians and philanthropists, to people of various nations or races, to followers of various spiritual or supposedly spiritual paths, to individuals widely revered as saints or incarnations of God, and much more. And we recognize that such statements may discourage some readers from reading further.

 

Nonetheless, we think that adding notes or appendices to explain what Srila Prabhupada intended would be unwise, and potentially disastrous, especially if the purpose of the explanation were to soften the impact of Srila Prabhupada’s words, to explain that he “didn’t really mean” what he appears to have said—that is, not just to explain but to “explain away.”

 

The GBC’s remaining reason is this: “Some ISKCON devotees may have used these statements out of context as an excuse to offend, neglect and abuse women.”

 

We agree that this is true. But we believe that providing guidance and instruction on such matters is the responsibility of the GBC and ISKCON’s leaders, not the BBT or its editors.

 

And we believe that Srila Prabhupada’s books are the wrong place for his followers to insert corrective guidance on morals, ethics, or proper attitudes and behavior. We think that annotating Srila Prabhupada’s books to keep ISKCON devotees from going off track is simply a bad idea.

 

We are concerned, also, that the GBC has asked us to insert endnotes or appendices to explain not only the statements they quoted but also “other such statements as determined by the BBT.”

 

That is not a road we think it wise for us to set off on. Once we get started, where does it end?

 

In conclusion: We do not intend to add anything to Srila Prabhupada’s books, or subtract anything, or change anything Srila Prabhupada says, to make his controversial or potentially controversial statements more acceptable to readers or less vulnerable to misuse by ISKCON devotees.

 

We believe that this would be unwise, contrary to our prescribed duties, and potentially disastrous. We also strongly urge whoever our successors may be to preserve Srila Prabhupada’s books intact and reject all proposals, however well intentioned, for softening the impact of his words.

[AncientMariner]

I do not even understand why they even care about the books. It is my understanding that spirutal knowledge cannnot be transmitted by books so who cares what the books say. Edit them all you want as far as I am concerned.

[Bishadi]

 

In conclusion: We do not intend to add anything to Srila Prabhupada’s books, or subtract anything, or change anything Srila Prabhupada says, to make his controversial or potentially controversial statements more acceptable to readers or less vulnerable to misuse by ISKCON devotees.

 

We believe that this would be unwise, contrary to our prescribed duties, and potentially disastrous. We also strongly urge whoever our successors may be to preserve Srila Prabhupada’s books intact and reject all proposals, however well intentioned, for softening the impact of his words.

 

 

Integrity to the words of a teacher appears 'good' but then again these comments above share an isolation away from the compassion of each person, in which to care only for your own and not all, is where the ideals of faith fail existence.

 

An opinion

[Bishadi]

for example:

 

to read this and simply change the names (to protect the innocent)

 

then see how this also applies to this thread and what it means

 

 

"Almost every sect of Christianity is a perversion of its essence, to

accomodate it to the prejudices of the world."

William Hazlitt, English essayist. The Round Table, "On the Causes of

Methodism" (1817).

 

 

A quote from 'ksna' thread opening

 

food for thought

[suchandra]

 

I do not even understand why they even care about the books. It is my understanding that spirutal knowledge cannnot be transmitted by books so who cares what the books say. Edit them all you want as far as I am concerned.

Krsna incarnated as Srila Vyasadeva to write books, the Vedas. Could be that to reject trancendental literature coming to us through the bona fide parampara system is the same as rejecting Krsna. But since we are in the material world it is normal that there're lots of people rejecting Krsna and are not concerned.

That the BBT is rejecting the GBC is beneficial news, ISKCON devotees are declining to accept the bureau of the GBC gurus exactly as many ex-ISKCONites have rejected the GBC authority.

That means ISKCON is melting down itself since people are no longer admitting to the authority of the gurus.

 

At the same time, where are the GBC's gurus going to get the money to make their all new printing plates for their so-called annotated books, this costs a big money and they are bankrupted?

And: already -- they cannot hardly sell books like SDG has written and who will buy the changed books?

Probably: nobody! This is also goodish since it re-focuses our first complaint about it is offensive changing the books of Srila Prabhupada.

[Sarva gattah]

 

Srila Prabhupada said -- "after I am gone you probably will not print my books, I need to see them printed while I am still here."

 

That way there would be millions of originals in circulation so when they changed the books, the originals would still exist.

 

So put an end to the GBC's attempts to water down Srila Prabhupada's Books, Keep them AS IT IS for the next 10,000 years

 

Let them know this with the 'free speach' they fear so much!!