Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 , " i_free_spirit " <i_free_spirit wrote: Thank you very much aradhana for this beautiful post on bhakti. It covered almost all points. But my personal experience is that most of the bhaktas tend to become fanatics... they are not ready to accept any other path and reject others' deities with forceful emotions. Why it happens and what a Bhakta should do to avoid being fanatic?? Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 , beirut_ka_baba <no_reply wrote: >Namaste Dear baba and all others, I will attempt to answer though I cant say if my answer will suffice. The devotees are not to be blamed themselves so much. This is bound to happen when unripe devotees follow the bogus Gurus and schools and thier misleading teachings.Lord Krishna says about sanskaari/cultivated in good manners and thoughts - he is " the one who bows to saints/mahapurushas, dietes(devaas) and other superiors such as brahmins.. " Now if a bogus or misleading school or Guru asks the follower to reject Shiva as a demi god or call him as secondary to Vishnu this is bound to happen.If they are taught to question the philosophy and principles laid down by mahapurushas and avtaaras and scriptures or reject them, they are to be blamed less than thier " gurus " . These schools instill in the minds of thier unripe followers very cunningly that Krishna or Rama or Shiva will be very happy if they make a person follower of thier school and how the other schools are misleading and false.A saadhak can not thinking of making other devotees unless he himself is self realised.This is kalyuga so rare places and gurus are genuine whereas most are bogus. Religion is intermingled with business. Thats why one copy of scripture is sold for rs 300-500 as against the price of rs. 1 to 10 that the arya samaj and sanatana dharma temples sell or rather distribute.So the so caaled " Shaivas " and " Vaishnavas " call other people names if they say that Vishnu, Shiva and Shakti are not different from one another.The followers of Rama says that Rama is a superior manifestation and the followers of Krishna say that Krishna is a superior manifestation.In other words they reject anything that can favour any other school of business. Just as Bible has been tampered with by various sects of Christianity- the puranas and other scriptures have been distorted by these schools in the books that they sell. Its simple as to why one should not be fanatical. The prophets,the saints, mahapurushas and avtaaras and thier preachings can not be judged by ignorant or ordinary people no matter how knowledgeable they think that they might have become.understanding Religion is a matter of faith and wisdom and not of following schools and bogus gurus blindly. So I think in todays time its infinitely better that people make Krishna or Shiva or Shakti themselves thier gurus and not be decieved by false doctrines and gurus.I myself have thirty two Gurus but I see them as one and not different from the others.Also I know what difference having a guru makes to one's life despite that I have to say that people should avoid making " gurus " in kalyuga since chances are more than 95 percent that the guru might be false. I will attempt to discuss about why and how fanatcism should be avoided in next postings.Thanks for the encouragement Mean while I also wish to know your own thoughts on the matter as to why and how fanaticism is a hinderance and why people tend to become fanatical regards to all Aradhana > , " i_free_spirit " <i_free_spirit@> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 , " " beirut_ka_baba " wrote: Why it happens and what a Bhakta should do to avoid being fanatic?? --\ -------------------- I think this is a natural process of evolution. That one Deity to which they are so fanatically devoted to, also helps them to get out of that situation. As in the case of Ramakrishna, Mother Kali herself showed him the way out. I think in the early stages that strong devotion to one's Ishta helps the Sadhaka. radhakutir OM -- Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.13.0/980 - Release 8/30/2007 6:05 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 > Why it happens and what a Bhakta should do to avoid being fanatic?? > Aum people assume sometimes that one rupa/form of God is different from the others whereas God is only one but he has many forms and names.One can worship God in any form he chooses but his bhakti will face an obstacle when he worships one form of God and rejects another for any reason. This does not mean that he worships all forms of God necessarily because worshipping any one is sufficient. But he must accept other forms of the same God and give them equal respect and not be hostile to them.All forms/manifestations and names of God are the one and the same. One must not be fanatical as it deludes the person, snatches his sense of discernment and a grave offence against devotees and God is committed. Just as the understanding that God resides in every being of the universe is important so is it important to see all forms of God as one I feel.All kinds of discrimination in the mind have to be ended. >Saint Tulsidas says - " I pay my obesciences to the name of Lord Raghunath- Ram which means KRISHANU/AGNI/FIRE , BHANU/SURYA/SUN AND HIMKAAR/MOON/CHANDRA AS IN THE SYLLABLES R, AA and M (OF HINDI).Ram is the cause of all. This name of Ram is Brahma, Vishnu, Shiv rupa. He is the life force in Vedas,He is nirguna and upmarahit(can not be praised in words) " Atri muni performed austerities and meditated for a very long time.At last Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva appeared.He became perplexed thinking that he had expected the supreme personality to appear but three have appeared. So he deduced that they were the same God. In response to this they replied: " yes we are one and the same person.Because you were worsipping us(God) we three have appeared. " Just as Lakshmi and Visnu are one , Shiva and Shakti are one so Laxmi and Paarvati , Ram and Sita, Radha and Krishna are also one.Hence Vishnu, Shiva and Shakti are all one.Maata or Shakti is the feminine face of God. The scriptures and saints say that everything in this world is a reflection of that which is there in spiritual world hence male and female are there in material world too. Shirdi Sain Baba(incarnation of God) says(as regarding to the form of God which one chooses to worship)- " wherever your minds become very attracted and you are overjoyed consider that place (ie that rupa) as the place of your liberation " A devotee asked Shirdi Sain Baba as to what his name Sainbaba meant. He answered: " Sa means devi/godess and ain means maa/mother.Baba similarly means pita or father. The father and mother who give you birth love thier children but in that love thier lies some hidden selfishness.but Sainbaba's love is completely selfless. They show you the way, inspires you, shows you the simple and straight way towards aatmagyaana and aatmadarshan. Besides Sain words is also used for Parameshwar, Allahtallah and maalik(master) " THIS SERMON CONTINUES. WILL RESUME LATER REGARDS TO ALL ARADHANA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 > But my personal experience is that most of the bhaktas tend to become > fanatics... they are not ready to accept any other path and reject > others' deities with forceful emotions. > > Why it happens and what a Bhakta should do to avoid being fanatic?? Babaji, I think this happens because Bhaktas try to become Gyanis. So most of these Bhaktas form theories of how the Universe was formed, with their Ishta Devtaa(Shiv, Vishnu or anyone) in the center. They then have to give other Devas an inferior place in their own theory. But Bhakti is already the highest stage-for a Bhakta to try & form theories, instead of just loving God with a pure heart, is against Bhakti. Pure Bhakti is when you love each & every thing & Being created by God, unconditionally. How can you then claim Shiv or Vishnu are superior? This is just hypocricy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 , radha_sharma_99 <no_reply wrote: > > > But my personal experience is that most of the bhaktas tend to become > > fanatics... they are not ready to accept any other path and reject > > others' deities with forceful emotions. > > > > Why it happens and what a Bhakta should do to avoid being fanatic?? > oh thats so beautiful! just correct. Thats why I think trying to accumulate knowledge or gyaana deliberately leads to a temporary suspension of pure bhakti.Its very appropriate I think for a bhakta that he keeps immersed in bhakti bcos if I try to start thinking like a gyaani- " wow I am a viyogi-hoow great is that because its very fortunate to be a viyogi because viyog has these results " or that " sanyog and viyog are one " how will I have the rasa of bhakti?? It would be infinitely better that I keep thinking like a devotee- " oh! how wretched I am that I have to stay away from God even though he is so merciful to others " bhakti is a higher stage than the stage in that a person attempts to accumulate gyaana.total Faith should be kept and solving the entanglements should be left to God so that with time he can teach gradually and perfectly through direct experience even if it seems difficult. Please pardon me all if I have said anything wrong and do correct me if you think that I am wrong somewhere.Bhakti should be kept as bhakti alone unless the gyaana sprouts itself in the mind. thanks a lot Radha ji :-)for that which u said below > But Bhakti is already the highest stage-for a Bhakta to try & form > theories, instead of just loving God with a pure heart, is against > Bhakti. > > Pure Bhakti is when you love each & every thing & Being created by > God, unconditionally. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 Dear Fellow Sadhakas, Obeisances to all. If we refer Shreemad Bhagavad Gita, we find right advice. Ch.9 Shloka 23-24-25 read as 'The devotees loving no one else constantly think of Bhagavan Yogeshwara and worship Him in a disinterested spirit, ever united with Him, are brought under His security and personally atteded to their needs by Him. Even those who endowed with faith worship ogher gods with some interested motive ultimately worhip Hom alone, though with mistaken approach. For He is the enjoyer and also the Lord of all sacrifices; but they know Him not in reality, as the Supreme Deity, hence they fall in the cycle of libe & death again. Those who are vowed to gods to to the gods, those who are vowed to the manes reach the manes; those who adore the spirits reaach spirits and those who worship Him come to He alone and because of this His devotees are no longer subject to birth and death cycle'. Many individuals proclaiming themselves as Devotees of particular deity do not get understood this fact/principle. As we observe in nature, all the brooks, streams, revulates, rivers and all flows of water ultimately try to go the oceans, knowingly or unkwoingly with or without intention and none can escape from natures course. Those who who try to resist and suceed, become small small ponds with limited supply and as there is no outflow (i.e. sharing with others), their water, after some times get contimated, adultered, and a fould, unpleasant smell starts emaniting from it. It becomes un-usable as well as harmful to its users.. Similer the case of devotees, who act / behave fanatically contemption other deities and hating other devotees. They are short-sighted, closed minded/hearted. As they do not shares thoughts, devotions with others through Satsanga, can not get real and wide perception remain devoid of proper knowledge of Almighty. Because of this fanatic view only, though we are rich in Knowledge and Devotion/worship in the world, we are lagging much in the expansion of these things in the whole human community on the earth. We need not force or allure or tempt anybody to accept our Religion or culture, we want to convince them the right way of devotion of their deities. This is the reason many of the inteligent, rationals and open hearted people are being attacted to movements like " ISCON " and so many other organizations distributing Aryan and Vaidik knowledge. We can observe / mark that this Sadhana Group itself is getting more and more new members. I am sure, whener there thinkers like you are there to guide us, the number of thirsty ones like me will ever increase., search, get and practice for self upliftment up to 'Self-realisation' as well as 'God-realisation'. Thanks and Heartful regards to all. radha_sharma_99 <no_reply > wrote: > But my personal experience is that most of the bhaktas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 , keshav daund <keshav_daund wrote: > > Dear Fellow Sadhakas, Obeisances to all >Keshav ji thanks for the beautiful thoughts. Are you an ISKCON Follower?This is for all devotees here. Why did an ISKCON person who translated Srimadbhagvatam say that - " Lord Krishna is God and Lord Shiva is a demigod.For those who worship God it is not necessary to worship demigods still Krishna wants his devotees to be respected and thats why Lord Shiva should be respected. " I was shocked to read this especially since I have always had and still have great respect for Srila Prabhupada. To me it seemed an outright denial of the fact that Lord Shiva is God and not just Mahadeva and a Vaishnava. Can anyone clarify this? Meanwhile I was also shocked to read at other places how people of the Shaiva and Vaishnava schools spoke of the other form of God as lesser than the one they worship.Many caaled Shiva bhagvaan a demi god. All this really hurts any true devotee. Why do they say such things?? Dear baba all these planets tht you mentioned are part of the material world? What is brahm jyoti? Is it part of the spiritual world from where the soul never comes back? Radha ji and all others.Why is devotee not satisfied through gyaana? What do you think is the subtle reason?Why we think that reasoning is lower than bhakti? Or is it a wrong thought? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 Hi, I disagree with Prabhupada's philosophy.... I have read many of Prabhupada's books and I found some of them distasteful. Some were abusing Shankara, in the guise of glorifying krishna...He rejects all scriptures other than the gaudia math version, which in my opinion is like the ostrich that thinks by putting its head into the ground, the world has vanished. In my opinion their style of thinking is the remnant of the age old vaishnava shaiva infighting.....It is oppressive to the sadhaka and closes ones mind to other schools of thought. How ever can truth be contained in a set of books???? For them the gita and Bhagavatham are supreme... They are wonderful books no doubt... but they are not the only thing that is the truth. A true bhaktha can never hurt another.. even if that person is his enemy.... But if you are a advaitin or a shiva bhaktha and by chance see a ISKON person.. the first thing they say is you guys are mayavadis....deluded... Shankara was sent by Krishna to spread delusion..... I am sorry, but that takes the cake... In my opinion, Their school of Thought fits the description of fanaticism to the T When ever I see a ISKON person... I Run like hell.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 " So you have to approach the Supreme Person, means Krsna or His representative. All others are rascals and fools. If you approach a person, guru, who is not representative of Krsna, you are approaching a rascal. How you'll be enlightened? " I got this saying of Prabhupada from a post here on Sadhana.... If this is not being a fanatic... then we have to take a relook at the dictionary..... I dont mean to hurt anyones views... but this is taking things a little too far. I heard of a story..... One man used to go walking everyday morning with his walking stick... He was so uncaring about others that he used to wildly swing his walking stick while walking. One young man went up to him and told him that it is dangerous and he must not be swinging so wildly... That man said... Swinging is my right...it is my hand and my walking stick... But then the young man snatched away his stick and told him this... " Dear Sir, your liberty and freedom begins with your hand and stick, but ends at my nose " Love Bala.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 , " Balachander Govindaraghavan " <balachand wrote: > > " So you have to approach the Supreme Person, means Krsna or His Dear Bala, Vivekananda told a very good story. a frog from the lake wandered and fell into a well. the frogs of the well welcomed him and asked where are you coming from from a big lake - replied the lake frog one frog jumped and covered half of the well and asked - you lake is that big ? Lake frog_ No far bigger than that Then the leader of frogs came and jumped from one end of well to the other and asked - yr lake cant be bigger than that... because this is the biggest water body on earth. Lake frog smiled and said- you cant imagine a lake and there are far bigger water bodies than lakes...there are oceans too All the frogs gathered and said this is blasphemy as our prophet told that this well is the biggest water body... so they all killed him Hari Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 When a Bhakta has no Gyan, he becomes a fanatic- he fails to see the One Divinity behind all Gods. He loves 1 form of the God, failing to see the Great Soul that creates all forms of God. When a Gyani has no Bhakti- he becomes a dry intellectual- he fails to comprehend the great Love the Divine feels for all creatures. He fails to understand that all knowledge is useless till it gives knowledge of the True Love of God. I read an excelent thing somewhere: " Love is not a quality of God- Love *is* God " . The Gyan of Love & Bhakti is the Real & only Gyan. Love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 Wow.. Shantnu.. That was a beautiful answer.... Love Bala.. On 9/2/07, shanracer <no_reply > wrote: > > When a Bhakta has no Gyan, he becomes a fanatic- he fails to see the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 > > All the frogs gathered and said this is blasphemy as our prophet > told that this > o.k Shri Bala ji o.k baba . Though my prophet said this..... lol -: Japo Har Shri Nath hamesh, man mein dhyaan dharo HAR Hari ka naam dhyavo, sab paap mitein kalesh; SHRI Shakti maata hai sab ke, jinkey sut hain Ganesh; NATH Shambhu ka naam aradho, Shiv Shankar Bhole Mahesh; vighan haran mangal ke daata, maata sabki vishesh dev muni sab pujein jinko naarad shaarad shesh baal pe kirpa apni kijey hain Ved tere darvesh. Such an approach can make all frogs happy :-) Happy Janmashtmi TO ALL BEST WISHES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 > As in the case of Ramakrishna, Mother Kali herself showed him the way >out. I think in the early stages that strong devotion to one's I dont think Ramakrishna was a fanatic- he never engaged in " My God is stronger than your God " type of discussions. He respected all Devas/Devis, even trying paths of Christianity & Islam, & succeeding on them. Because he respectde all Divinities, & never engaged in petty behaviour, thats why Kali showed him the way out. I dont any other Vaishnav/Shaiv Guru had this honour- being able to reach height of both Dwait & Adwait Vedant. Ramakrishnas Bhakti was a very special kind- he cant be compared to ordinary Bhaktas, in the same way you cant compare the man who paints your house to Da Vinci! Love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 Dear kesava... May God bless you. I expected a stronger reaction from ISKCON friends.. You are indeed very mild. In any case...I did not insult Prabhupada.. I just disagreed with him. It is my right and India is a free country. Just because Prabhupada disagreed with many bhakthas of other paths... It does not mean he will go to hell. The basis of sadhana is freedom and any group that tries to destroy it using threats is fanatic... Whatever you might think of that. Also.. At the age of 70 going around the world is a brave thing to do...I accept I cannot do it.... that is because it is not in my philosophy.. Just yesterday 2 indian airforce pilots went aound the world in 80 days.. in a microlight aircraft.. That I am sure prabhupada could not have done ....forget 70.. even at the age of 20.!!! Different people do different things... In any case... If hell involves freedom of thought and speech... I think you fellows are looking for enlightenment in the wrong place!!!!! You have a funny bone for sure... You say you cannot curse... but just the line before... u say i will go to hell ! You claim to be the servant to all sadhana members.. that includes me tooo.. so as per your words... you are berating and being abusive to your master.... Funny!!!! dot take it seriously I was jut joking.... I am master to none but my self....and servant to none but my conciousness... Anyway dont worry.... You will NOT go to hell... If people went to hell for minor things like this.... then hell will for sure be over crowded.... I Love you and pray that you get all success in your sadhana... Love Bala.... On 9/7/07, Jaya Kesava Dasa <krsnajoe wrote: > > Dear Balachander Govindaraghavan,Your Remarks about my Gurudeava,Srila Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 > , " Jaya Kesava Dasa " <krsnajoe >wrote: > > Dear Balachander Govindaraghavan,Your Remarks about my >Gurudeava,Srila Prabhupada are all very Offensive Namaste all. Jaya Kesava Deva ji please forgive me but I think its my duty to be honest and speak my mind even though I have no right in this world to judge or even unknowingly hurt anyone but hurting isnt my intention. yes Ramakrishna Paramhansa was a great saint- a bhakti yoga who wrote a lot in favour of unity of religions ie he did a lot against the evil of fanaticism from society but just as the parable of Swami Vivekanand ji says the frog of well will remain the frogs of well.It does not need gyaana but common sense to understand that God is one. Just as I got very hurt by that which some ISKCON books mentioned, I or somebody else will speak against ISKCON as a natural reaction to the outraged feelings and the ISKCON follower will be hurt. Everybody is getting hurt because of hurting others! Its not the saints like Srila Prabhupada (in my opinion) who do this. I have read many books by ISKCON .I was surprised to notice that in the older editions I saw Srilaprabhupada praising Lord Sankracharya as the mahatma of India.And in the newer its altogether a different scene.Sankracharya is being called mayavadi, Shiva is being called demi god and impersonalists/ those who worship the nirguna brahmn are being called deluded! Its fine that you say you dont follow a particular philosophy but you have no right to abuse and hate it either! So I decided that it was probably not Srilaprabhupada but members of ISKCON who started adding fanaticism to thier books when Srilaprabhupada was not there as the head anymore. And what will a foreigner who knows nothing about Hinduism do?? He will believe whatever he is told because he never went beyond the well that the books showed him.Now God alone knows what the truth is. Why blame ISKCON alone? Only because it is famous?? This world is full of people who are comitting blasphemy in the name of religion. You can follow your school of thoughts without speaking against the others in your commentaries and books.An ISKCON book said that Krishna is the greatest. I said indeed he is. Then they said Chaitanyamahaprabhu is greater than Krishna. I said thats great-yes Guru is greatest.But according to them Chaitanyamahaprabhu irrespective of the fact that he is saktyavesa or any other such kind of avtaara/incarnation(according to their theories) can be called greater than God but Shiva can not be called God because he is demi God!! Now what do we call this except fanaticism?? Is it really Balaji's fault that he spoke like this? What will a person do if he reads somewhere that except the following school of thoughts no one else should be made a Guru!? I say its great that Srilaprabhupada exposed so many cheaters during his life time but that does not mean all people except certain math people are bogus!An ISKCON person said to me- " I will expose all cheaters who claim to be incarnations. I said -fine.its duty of a person to speak the truth. But do we know all?? Who are we to reject any philosophy or teachings of a mahatma?? Ocean is the water body where all other water bodies meet. Together the streams, lakes, rivers etc are complete and not by rejecting others. The truth is broader than we can ever percieve. So just as its an sin to speak against a particular saint then it is a sin to speak against any saint or religion in this world and any other incarnation or form of God in this world!! In your people it is immaturity and in other people it is blasphemy?? What kind of devotion is this I ask? Abhoring anyone who follows Sankracharya philosophy? I understand that a devotee can not follow advaita at all. But it doesnt mean that Krishna sent Shiva to teach a false doctrine so that people can become devotees!! Any incarnation of God never speaks anything except the truth. Now Sankracharya spoke of old Vedantic philosophy and not something new. But he never spoke against devotees -he built temples of Hari and Shiva.So ISKCON is more correct than Hinduism by saying Vedas teach materialism in the name of religion thats why SrilaVyasadeva was dissatisfied before writing Srimadbhagvatam?? Acc to the non ISKCONIST Srimadbhagvatam Vyasadeva was dissatisfied because his work for kaliyuga people was incomplete without praising saguna God and thats all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 Humble Obeisance to all Sadhakas, Here is some mis or short apprehension of thought of Sril Prabhupada. Supreme Personality of Godhead is refered to " Purna Brahma " . Bhagavan Yogeshwar Krishna was " Purna Brahma " and hence when He was in just a child form, Bhagavan Shiva had gone to Salute Him. Bhrahma, Vishnu and Mahesh are incarnations of Purna Brahma for specific administration of the Universe. While worshipping one particular deity, one should be engrossed in that deity only. Whatever is expressed for others is just to resit the deviation of minds of new devotees like this God to that God. Demi-gods are not inferior Gods. They have their due respect for every one. We should not take it serious as we are on higher platform, have read many books, critiques and all. We need not criticise books in the past. This criticism will increase mental disturbance and a sense of hatred, which we want to eradicate/root out from hour hearts, will sprout again. To avoid this please bear with every one patiently, read whatever expressed and if disagreed, state what is right or 'delete' from the mind. In Tulasi Ramayana Bhagavan Shiva Himself has stated that He always chants " Shri Rama " in His mind keepig Ramas figure in Heart. So also Bhagavan Rama has stated at Rameshwaram that He always worships 'Bhagavan Shiva' and hasHis figure in His Heart with high respect for Him. It is also warned by Shri Rama that the person thinking Shri Rama and Shri Shiva as different Gods, is a siner and his worship will neither be accepted by Him nor by Shiva. When the deities themselves advise us to see 'oneness' i.e Advaita, why should we bother for what is right and what is wrong expression. We are very small individuals prone to be swayed away because of ignorance. So be quiet, study, expreess, be happpy and PLEASE do not criticise any body in person or group. The past is past and need not be re-opened for discussions on this stage, whatever is useful, informative, convincing and revealing new secrets for our advancements may please studied and discussed. Once again I appeal to be sobre, calm, pleasant and happy. Love everyone for better advancementin Sadhana. PLEASE PARDON ME IF OUT OF CONTEXT AND PLACE. Heartful Regards. = Keshav. i_free_spirit <i_free_spirit wrote: >Keshav ji thanks for the beautiful thoughts. Are you an ISKCON Follower?This is for all devotees here. Why did an ISKCON person who Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 *Harikesa:* So it's not possible that anyone's happy? There is no possibility of anyone being happy. *Prabhupada:* No. One who thinks he is happy, he is number one fool. *Pusta Krsna:* Everyone is searching after material happiness. *Prabhupada:* Yes. But there is no happiness. *Harikesa:* What about if one is in the mode of goodness? Maybe one or two... *Prabhupada:* Mode of goodness... If he thinks that he is happy, then he is fool. The mode of goodness means one must know that we cannot be happy here. That is mode of goodness. And if he thinks, " I am happy, " then he is not in mode of goodness. He's in darkness. *Pusta Krsna:* So everyone at present is trying to become happy by this or that activity. *Prabhupada:* They are fools, rascals. *Pusta Krsna:* So if everyone accepts that there is no happiness at all to be found in this world... *Prabhupada:* Then they are intelligent. *Pusta Krsna:* Then what to do? *Prabhupada:* Yes. Tad-vijnanartham... Therefore you go to guru. Go to Krsna. Self explanatory..... no comments (for the fear of going to hell)!!!!! Love Bala.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 *Prabhupada:* Where is religion in Western countries? There is no religion. All bogus thing. Religion means to surrender to God. Then where is God, and whom to surrender? They surrender to senses, that's all. So unless there is God, what is the meaning of religion? That is not religion. They have created something, civilized human society. There must be some religion. Just like aristocracy means he must have a good dog, that's all. There is no religion in the world except Krsna consciousness. All bogus. *Harikesa:* What is the Pope doing, then? (laughter) *Prabhupada:* He's another big bogus man. The Pope's assistant died in the prostitute's house. *Pusta Krsna:* In Paris. Comments: No comments. (for the fear of going to hell)!!! and I havent made these up.. They are extracts from http://science.krishna.org/Articles/2000/12/00228.html Love Bala... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 Aradhana... That is a wonderful post...So balanced.... It is this balance that makes a sadhaka... Love Bala... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 , " i_free_spirit " <i_free_spirit wrote: > Shri Bala ji and others namaste. Fanaticism cant be justified under > any pretext!! Aradhana you are right that fanaticism is not pardonable...But i have experienced at least 90 & of bhaktas (that includes christians & muslims too)....are ready to kill/die for their deity. Even in hinduism, mainly Vaishvanites, reject everything else besides their deity. Followers of gurus, are even one step ahead. I met 100s of people each forcing me to accept that their guru is the only True one....and luckily i have no guru, mainly due to this reason. I think it is human weakness to reject what others think and glorify their own findings.... in Religion they do it in the name of their deity or guru. In fact most of the gurus of today, encourage such behaviour of their followers... I have made my own yardstick... i see if the guru or his followrs are rejecting others and glorifying their own path/guru/deity... i run away (like bala runs from isckon..LOL) I have this strong faith that the real guru is sitting inside us and guiding our every moment... only our ears are attuned to course sounds and throat is heavy with harsh words... otherwise we can liten to our inner guru and really make progress.. In my case, i can say, the inner Guru never failed me !! Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 Dear Bala, Thanks for your wise words . Can someone elaborate the difference between bhakti yoga and blind faith. Thanks, Nitin On Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 Dear Aradhana... I am not expert either!!!! In fact I know very little about Jainism... I am willing to share what little I know. Jainism and Buddhism are twin religions in the sense that both of them deny the existance of God. Buddhism believes that everything is shunya... Zero and so does jainism. But Jains beleive in Thirthankaras ....Masters (forgive my spelling).... and Mahavira is the most famous among them What I love about Jainism is their non violence.... and acceptance of everything... I heard Mahavira's concept of truth contains everything.....Truth and lies make up the whole truth. Suppose we say * " The Sun Exists " * Of course it is true now......But then this could also be wrong a few billion years back the sun did not exist and a few billion years from now the sun will not exist as we know it. so at that period in time we have to say * " The sun does not exist " * ** Suppose we are at a period when hydrogen and other gasses are just forming.... We cannot be sure... they might form a sun. who knows...!!!! so at that point in time we have to say * " The Sun might Exist " and so on and so forth... " there is nothing called as the sun " " existance itself is the sun " * Now if you want the full truth... you have to say everything...you cannot even use time... because there is nothing like time....space is also an illusion.... I am sure there is a lot more..... Would be happy if any body else could enlighten us more. Love Bala... On 9/5/07, i_free_spirit <i_free_spirit wrote: > > Shri Bala ji and others namaste. Fanaticism cant be justified under > any pretext!! it is the worst kind of blasphemy. Those who try to > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 I can try Nithin... When I love my mother no matter what happens it is Bhakthi... When I say My mother is the only mother in the world it is blind faith.... Love Bala.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.