An inquiry on Krishnamurti

[Guest guest]

Hello to all, it seems that an eternity has passed since my last post.

I have a question about the teachings of Krishnamurti and their

application to life.

 

Is it possible to find truth on one's own without any form of

mediation, as he as stated on his speech " Truth is a Pathless Land. " ?

[Guest guest]

, " theseraphicbeing "

 

Hello Marco,

 

Greetings!

 

It is easy to say once you have achieved the goal that you do not

need anyone. Did Mr. Krishnamurthi reach there without GURU?

From the time he was born he was weaned away for special training,

which all contributed to his mindset to achieve whatever he has

achieved and then saying you do not need anybody looks kind of

foolish.

 

Look in nature all the females teach their young ones to hunt,

to fly, to eat etc., Similarly we as humans had first teacher

our mom without which we would be total misfit in this society.

Then ofcourse came dad then other siblings neighbours etc., In

schools we had different teacher for different subjects. So what

makes him comment that spiritual path of which we have absolutely

no background in anyway (we are like babes lost in jungles) can be

traversed without a guide/guru/teacher whatever.

 

In fact the internal journey is more dangerous and risky and

travelling without a guide is fishing for trouble. No way the

journey can be successful. Those who have tried like yogis on

the strength of pranayama are still loitering in the astral world

completely unawares of the actual path to come out and achieve

final liberation (moksha).

 

So please do not be deluded we need a guide and a guide who has

gone there and come to explain the intricacy of the path. Ofcourse

finding a guide is another story.

 

Hope this answers your doubt.

 

With warm wishes,

Sudhakar

HARI OM TAT SAT! Cheers! )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<elguapo_marco_2008 wrote:

>

> Hello to all, it seems that an eternity has passed since my last

post.

> I have a question about the teachings of Krishnamurti and their

> application to life.

>

> Is it possible to find truth on one's own without any form of

> mediation, as he as stated on his speech " Truth is a Pathless

Land. " ?

>

[Guest guest]

I agree with Sudhakarji. Krishnamurty had the best Yoga and Buddhists

Gurus, who taught him secret techniques. For him to then claim all

techniques are useless is a bit hypocritical.

 

Swami Satyananda Saraswati said when he got full enlightenment:

 

" I now know that all the meditations I did over many lives were

useless in getting me to this stage. I also know that if I hadnt done

them ,I would never had reached this stage. A stage comes when you

feel all sadhna useless, but to reach that stage you have to do sadhna "

 

The difference between Krishnamurty & Satyananad is, Krishnamurty was

a good Sadhak but bad Guru. Thats why none of his followers are famous.

 

Thats why good Gurus are so rare- many people can find enlightenment

for themself, but to explain to others is very difficult.

[Guest guest]

, shanracer <no_reply wrote:

>

> I agree with Sudhakarji. Krishnamurty had the best Yoga and Buddhists

 

 

Yes i too agree. Krishnamurthy was a great philosopher of vedanta but

i doubt if he was enlightened himself, nor has anyone of his disciples

got enlightenment.

 

Enlightenment does not come with words alone or thinking alone. If

one has tons of meditation done in last births...and in this birth he

suddenly becomes enlightened... and he declares nothing is required for

moksha.... look at me i got it without anything... is a false claim.

 

Those who know the Truth, who become Truth, do not spread such

messages.

 

Aum